- Joined
- Feb 27, 2007
- Posts
- 4,438
- Likes
- 5,881
- Location
- space
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Luton Town, Las Vegas Bears
I'm pretty sure fewer cows leading to less methane would be self-evident.
Less slaughter of animals leading to less violence is even beyond that; it's virtually the same thing.
These aren't the kind of statements you should require evidence for, but if you genuinely do, there's always Google.
Less slaughter of animals leading to less violence is even beyond that; it's virtually the same thing.
These aren't the kind of statements you should require evidence for, but if you genuinely do, there's always Google.
Less slaughter of animals = less violence? How, exactly? And here's a thought for you to ponder - historically, the rate of violent crime has DECREASED (see Crime and Justice, 5th edition, Palmer/de Lint/Dalton - GOOGLE THAT, I have a copy sitting on my desk next to me). At the same time as animal slaughter has increased. YOU HAVE AN OPINION ON THIS, that's fine - but it is not fact.
Fewer cows? How? What happens to all the cows in the world? They just magically stop breeding? I'd say, WITHOUT DOING ANY RESEARCH, that the cow population would INCREASE. And they'd still be eating and digesting food. So, still producing waste.
