Remove this Banner Ad

Vent Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Outburst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think Ballantyne played on the wing.
He seemed to pickup alot of cheap uncontested style marks on the wing during the game. Suban looked to play off a half back flank.

*EDIT
My vent is all my playing emergencies scoring higher than atleast one of my playing players. Good 200 points wasted thanks to barlow and a couple of others. But im also happy that my cover appears to be very good this year.
 
It's going to be a very average year.

My team is basically the same as the guy who is in 1st place, and my score not far off his either. Only like 150 points in it.

Yet I'm ranked 4000th, he is ranked 1st.


Just makes for a boring year. Teams are identical.

I know things change up a bit with trading etc...but lets face it, everyone is basically using the same strategy, the same rookie and the same guns.

The only difference is a few mid-priced players are different. Some went Hall, some went Ziebell, some went Dangerfield.


The good DTers will start to separate themselves no doubt, but its just very boring knowing that my team is the same as 4000 others and a score nearing 2200 means nothing.


And there's no point arguiing people should get unique picks. If you don't get the good picks you wouldn't even be in the top 50,000
 
It's going to be a very average year.

My team is basically the same as the guy who is in 1st place, and my score not far off his either. Only like 150 points in it.

Yet I'm ranked 4000th, he is ranked 1st.


Just makes for a boring year. Teams are identical.

I know things change up a bit with trading etc...but lets face it, everyone is basically using the same strategy, the same rookie and the same guns.

The only difference is a few mid-priced players are different. Some went Hall, some went Ziebell, some went Dangerfield.


The good DTers will start to separate themselves no doubt, but its just very boring knowing that my team is the same as 4000 others and a score nearing 2200 means nothing.


And there's no point arguiing people should get unique picks. If you don't get the good picks you wouldn't even be in the top 50,000

Could not agree more. Still love DT though:D
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I just think there was too much obvious value this year and too much spare $$. Pretty much resulted in a lot of similar picks as there wasn't really much need to take a risk on someone unique with so many obvious picks that were going to improve, and a lot of spare cash lying around. I would have been a lot more comfortable if they took $1mil off the salary cap to get some differentiation in the teams!

As said, trading will always catch up with a lot of the early season boomers. That's where i'll be trying to bring in some underpriced unique guys. So much more fun barracking for the one guy that "no-one" else has! Don't really have anyone like that in my squad this year...yet.
 
Vent at Suban and Walker. Both would have been in my side had they shown ANYTHING in the pre-season, Suban in particular. Now I just know he's going to have an even better season I thought he would.

Was looking at Suban closely as well Virgil. Was looking at a move to the wing, didn't watch the game, anyone know where he played?

He played EVERYWHERE :(.
Yeah he had a horrible pre season, but I stuck with him. :D

Hopefully it pays dividends, everyone was giving me sh** for putting him in my team.
 
I chose Joel Patfull because I thought he'd score well with Maguire in the team. Turns out that Maguire scores well...
 
I'm fairly annoyed that some of my more unique players, like Clark, Hargrave and Wright did so bloody terrible!

Taking Hunt and Waters above some of the others available at that price range may also sting later in the season.
 
29 points, not 58.

What am I missing here ?

Bartel (C) = 114 x 2 = 228

Swan = 143 (and if I hadn't changed him to Bartel a day before the game) x 2 = 286

286 - 228 = 58 missed points by captain error

You follow ?
 
What am I missing here ?

Bartel (C) = 114 x 2 = 228

Swan = 143 (and if I hadn't changed him to Bartel a day before the game) x 2 = 286

286 - 228 = 58 missed points by captain error

You follow ?

Bartel(C)+Swan=371
Bartel+Swan(C)=400
400-371=29.

You only miss out on 58 points if you chose Bartel instead of Swan as a player (ie you only have one of the two).
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What am I missing here ?

Bartel (C) = 114 x 2 = 228

Swan = 143 (and if I hadn't changed him to Bartel a day before the game) x 2 = 286

286 - 228 = 58 missed points by captain error

You follow ?

Bartel (c) 228 + Swan 143 = 371
Bartel 114 + Swan (c) 286 = 400

29 points.

EDIT: Whoops. Zerg in before me.
 
What am I missing here ?

Bartel (C) = 114 x 2 = 228

Swan = 143 (and if I hadn't changed him to Bartel a day before the game) x 2 = 286

286 - 228 = 58 missed points by captain error

You follow ?

Another one. Dear lord help us all.
 
Bartel(C)+Swan=371
Bartel+Swan(C)=400
400-371=29.

You only miss out on 58 points if you chose Bartel instead of Swan as a player (ie you only have one of the two).

Ok, I wasn't lateral enough in thought.

Thanks. I feel a little better. :)
 
I had Selwood or Boyd all pre - season but then suddnely for some reason I decide I want to be unique and put in Dal Santo and he pulls out 77! Mind you he played on Kirk which didn't help him I still would liked at least 85!:(
 
Okay, this is worth a vent...

I only have one team. I know a lot of people have more than one team, but I figured that was cheating so I didn't do it. But now... I'm sort of... starting to wish I did.

Before the season started, I created two teams on "paper" that were different to one another but both viable. The team I selected, based on the rookie-mid strategy, scored 2159. That's not bad, but here's the thing... The team I did not select, with a standard gun/rookie/value strategy, would have scored 2476... Seriously. 2476.

It's hard not to get upset about that.

And now I understand why people make more than one team.

Hindsight is a bitch.
 
Warnock you clown! The balls on this guy... Meanwhile Hille sits on the bench cos I figure Sandi will tear him a new one. Even if he does he would still surely outscore young Robbie here...
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Vent at Adcock. Only player that is wrong with my team, otherwise would be extremely happy.
It's now going to be trade to Shaw or Ladson.
 
**** you Clark ****ing spud. Should of picked Sandilands, but looks like I'll be burning a trade to get Sandilands. ****.****.****.

EDIT: Kicks a goal, right after my post the irony.
 
Mitch Clark you're breaking my balls. At least I do have Sandilands I guess. Cox was shithouse last week too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top