Surely because the VFL is the AFL and all records count etc etc, only a factor system can be fair when comparing older clubs (VFL) to more recent clubs post VFL.
It isnt fair to compare a team like Port to Essendon when the Dons have 16 flags and Port have only been in the comp for 13 years is it....
And it seems to be this 'what about me, it isn't fair' feeling that drives most into making these funny little claims. Even more so with Port supporters, who have gone from having bragging rights in the comp they migrated from, to now having among the fewest flags in the comp they migrated to. I can see why they've adopted this 'state-league victim' stance, irrespective of how meaningless it is.
If for the sake of fairness in making club comparisons, you want to view AFL records in a years p/flag format, that seems logical and reasonable enough to me. Certainly it is an infinitely more sensible approach to that of re-writing history and making up fantasy premiership tables.




