Vile, little ,scratching, behind the play wackin' Cretins

Remove this Banner Ad

Collingwood are like that though, you could add the word gutless in there too. Would rather play pi$$ about footy (chip, chip, chip, head to the line, rush a behind from 40m, etc) than play real footy.

"We know how to play the game"? Like F*** you do, Collingwood and football go together like Eddie McGuire and Respect or Sam Newman and Dignity.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I hate the Lions as much as the next bloke but its a grand final for christs sake. Your meant to be whacking blokes and giving the odd out the back punch in the gut. IMHO this grand final thus far has been very tame, there hasn't even been a full on fight. Heres hoping there is in the second half
 
I thought this was about Collingwood! Black and white stick together eh, very very biased.

The way I saw that was Collingwood were using thug tactics, cost them a goal so it didn't work.
 
Originally posted by Docker_Brat
I thought this was about Collingwood! Black and white stick together eh, very very biased.

The way I saw that was Collingwood were using thug tactics, cost them a goal so it didn't work.

It is about Collingwood
 
Originally posted by cornelia
Some of you Port people are still bitter about the Pies putting you out of the Grand Final race aren't you?
They're not bitter, they've just reverted back to their pre 1997 existance and backing Collingwood.
 
Originally posted by Docker_Brat

They're not bitter, they've just reverted back to their pre 1997 existance and backing Collingwood.

Huh, who is backing Collingwood? Why would anyone want to back a team with more grease than mechanics convention?
 
Originally posted by Zombie
Another free kick right in front of goal to Collingwood, Eddie has definitely paid them.

If that wasnt a free for in the back they should get the rule out of the book and never pay it again!

Brisbane had had about 4 free kicks for the same thing - the umpire was being consistent
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Originally posted by Macca19


If that wasnt a free for in the back they should get the rule out of the book and never pay it again!

Brisbane had had about 4 free kicks for the same thing - the umpire was being consistent

In the back is gor when a player is pushed in the back not when they are carried forward in the tackle from behind, I wish these Victorians would learn how our game is played.
 
Originally posted by Zombie


In the back is gor when a player is pushed in the back not when they are carried forward in the tackle from behind, I wish these Victorians would learn how our game is played.

Didnt hear you co mplaining when Brisbane got 4 frees in the first half for identical tackles
 
Originally posted by Macca19


Didnt hear you co mplaining when Brisbane got 4 frees in the first half for identical tackles

When? Didn't see Lynch line up from point blank range just for being tackled 4 times?
 
Originally posted by Zombie


When? Didn't see Lynch line up from point blank range just for being tackled 4 times?

Well look there...Voss just got a free for the exact same thing!!
 
i cant remember who said it but being carried forward and down from behind in a tackle CAN (and always has been) a push in the back.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Vile, little ,scratching, behind the play wackin' Cretins

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top