Votes v Adelaide round 23

[Boohemian]

I only caught the second half of the game, so I'll hold my votes. It's encouraging to see Barrass rating so highly amongst you all. I like his game, and he's clearly the future of the backline for our club. Rising star has to be coming up with such a dominant performance on Friday night footy (sorry Paul Roos).

 

[Marlin01]

5. Gaff
4. Barrass
3. Kennedy
2. Sheed
1. McGovern

 

[WCE1698]

5. JK - killed Talia
4. Barrass - Gov Jnr
3. Gaff - 40
2. Giles - coming in for NN.. big ask. Racked up 15 possys and was very good
1. Shuey - if just for that spinning handball on the wing

HM: Prid, Cripps, Masto, Gov

Barrass is Gov Snr

 

[salo]

5. gaff
4. jk
3. barrass
2. priddis
1. sheed (or giles)

plenty of honourable mentions: shep, gov, shuey lead the pack

 

[Magnum27]

5. Gaff
4. Barrass
3. Kennedy
2. Shuey
1. Sheed

 

[The_Reaper]

5. Gaff
4. Barrass
3. Priddis
2. Gile
1. Kennedy

 

[Matera LeNui]

5. Kennedy (Coleman Eater)
4. Barrass (Sexual Barrassment)
3. Shuey (Shoo In Deep)
2. Gaff (arrghh yeah the boys ahhhh)
1. Giles ( The GOAT.)

HM. Pridda, Sheed, Shep, Gov, Bunga.

 

[boondy]

1 sheed
2 barras
3 hutchings
4 kennedy
5 shuey
6 priddis
7 giles
8 gaff
9 darling
10 sheppard
So many good players Giles Hutchings Sheed in first set the tone . Shoulda flogged by 100

 

[squashface]

1 sheed
2 barras
3 hutchings
4 kennedy
5 shuey
6 priddis
7 giles
8 gaff
9 darling
10 sheppard
11

 

[CJApples87]

5 - Gaff
4 - Barrass
3 - Kennedy
2 - Shuey
1 - Giles

HM: Jetta early, Darling's 2nd half, Priddis, Sheed, McGovern... And the overall team effort.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Vin28]

5 Tom Barrass
4 Josh Kennedy
3 Luke Shuey
2 Andrew Gaff
1 Giles

 

[Miguel Sanchez]

5: Gaff
4: Shuey
3: Barrassment
2: Kennedy
1: Sheed

HMs to a bunch of very unlucky guys: Sheppard, Priddis, Giles, Wellers, Gov, Schoey

 

[ArdentEagle]

I really ******* hate Giles.............Until tonight.
Gaff - 5
Giles - 4
Kennedy - 3
Priddis - 2
Sheed -1
(Only votes this year)

 

[Godfather32]

I really ******* hate Giles.............Until tonight.
Gaff - 5
Giles - 4
Kennedy - 3
Priddis - 2
Sheed -1
(Only votes this year)

I think you may have misspelled Barrass

 

[ArdentEagle]

I think you may have misspelled Barrass

You're right....I did.
2 - Barrass.
* Priddis off!!!

 

[The Falcon Strike]

One of those nights where leaving a handful of blokes out who were quality.

Barrass and Gaff were 1 and 2 - raffle the order.

Shuey Next

Then a mixture of JK, Masten, Giles, Masten, Shepp, Pridda

 

[Jandamarra]

5) Gaff
4) Barrass
3) Kennedy
2) Shuey
1) Sheppard

HM: Gov, Giles, Lycett, Sheed + others

 

[Avalor]

What a game - love all those guys out there today.

5. Gaff .... was unbelievable with his run
4. JK - another Coleman to top off a great game
3. Barrass - do we have a player here - gun
2. Giles - a stunning performance when needed
1. Sheed - getting back to his best.

Shuey, Pridda, Shep .... so many hitting their straps at the right end of the year.

 

[AndysAngels]

5. Gaff - perfect wingmans game. Link play, quick hands and positioning were absolutely outstanding. Thought he was our best last week and he ******* destroyed it again tonight. So so good.
4. Priddis - a monster on the inside. played to his strengths very well tonight.
3. Barrass - omg. give this man a rising star nom
2. Giles - as i left work today, a mate said 'Giles better play the game of his life'. well, there you go Daniel.
1. JK - you know that nightmare where you wake up in the morning and freak out because you think you slept in and had an exam or whatever? That will be Talia for the next month because Kennedy took him the * to school

HM to Sheed! the missing puzzle piece in our midfield. makes such a huge difference to our play. our centre clearances at the start of this year were characterized by blind 30m snaps over the shoulder. now, we create space, we block, we ping the ball around until we can actually run at the 50, and it makes the entries so much more dangerous

 

[Broken_Chairs]

5. gaff
4. barrass
3. shuey
2. sheed
1. mr. september himself, giles

 

[MrKK]

5 Barrass
4 Gaff
3 Sheppard
2 Kennedy
1 Giles

HM: All the rest of you beautiful beasts

 

[Quinz]

* how do you give votes for a game like this? Priddis was immense but I can only just get him there. So many good players

5. Gaff- The Little Engine That Could
4. Barrass- Sexual Healing
3. Giles- White Lightning
2. Kennedy- If Your Dad Doesn't Have a Beard, You've Got RCD
1. Priddis- Wrecking Ball

 

[guero]

20 votes to the corrupt betting agencies that paid the garbage Radelaide Crows to throw the game against the struggling second rate West Coast Eagles in garbage Radelaide.

-5 votes to the absolute corrupt disgrace Radelaide players, who were pathetic and threw the game, led bravely by their absolute disgrace of a skipper. Shame on the conspirators.

 

[stevie_mac]

5. Gaff
4. Barrass
3. Kennedy
2. Shuey
1. Sheed

This was a game where we had few(er) passengers - even those that perhaps were (close to) being berated were nowhere near as bad as many might suggest. This is exactly the game and win we needed!

 

[Brave Sir Robin]

Just saying.

Let's say you pay off an AFL side to throw a game. You know, cos it's not like there are 40,000 soccer games the agencies offer every day that no one cares about which are easier money, but let's say, cos we're having fun here...

...You've decided to pay off an AFL team. To reach a critical mass of underperforming players you probably need at least 4 stars to completely not try. They're on about 5,000 a match or whatever, so considering what's at stake for them (their entire career) you need to offer a couple of hundred grand per person. Then they all need to accept it without dobbing about the approach from the bookies. Unlikely but let's keep going.

So you've got a few guys in your pocket, then you factor in that it's a game with 22 players on the team and 18 on the field at a time so even having 4 or so in your pocket isn't a guarantee. Let's just say to get enough guys in your pocket you spent a million. You probably need about $10m turnover just to make it worth it.

I used to work for a bookie. Aint many of them who could do $10m turnover if they tried, and those who have licences - say all of those operating in Australia, who do the most turnover - would never take the risk.