Votes v c******

[windyhill]

3. Laycock
2. Lloyd
1. Camporeale

 

[BOMBERSG8]

3- Laycock
2- Lloyd
1- Michael ( great job on fev no goals) or Gus

 

[BomberAce7]

3-Lloyd
2-Laycock
1-Monfries

 

[Wahooti Fandango]

3. Lloyd
2. McPhee
1. Monfries

 

[monty1104]

3. Laycock
2. Gus
1. Lloyd.

Honourables go to Campo, Stanton, Mal and Gumbys first half.

 

[Stants_24_Legend]

3.Laycock
2.Lloyd
1.Gumbleton

Laycock has to be our number 1 ruckmen from now on. He was fantastic today. Took the ruck contest in the middle and then played in front of Fevola and i think thats what won us the game

Lloyd was just back to his old self again today. Jamison really took it to him in the first half, but to Lloyd's credit he was magnificent

I thought Gumbleton today presented well and never stopped trying. He was the only one in the first half to put in a half decent effort.

The only reason i didnt give Campo any votes is because too many times he got the ball and turned it over.

Overall, shit game by the Bombers, but hey, a win is a win..

 

[drew_j]

Can I just nominate this post for title of the year?

 

[SOT4]

3. Lloyd
3. Campo
2. Laycock
1. Monfries

Fantastic from effort from these boys. Gotta hand it to Campo, he was fantastic today especially fromt he centre bounces.

 

[kelvin_sheedy]

3. McPhee
2. Lloyd
1. Monfries

How Laycock is getting votes is beyond me. He was ok but made way too many mistakes.

 

[marcuz]

3. McPhee
2. Lloyd
1. Monfries

How Laycock is getting votes is beyond me. He was ok but made way too many mistakes.

To be fair he made the vast majority of those in the first half when we as a team were rubbish. His ruckwork and clearances got us back in the match in the second half. Most guys drop their heads after a few mistakes but he worked his arse off to make up for it. I thought he was the most influential player on the ground today.

 

[windyhill]

Can I just nominate this post for title of the year?

You may Drew.

 

[thewhippersnapper]

3. Lloyd
2. Laycock
1. McPhee

 

[bomberlegend2007]

3 Lloyd
2 Monfries
1 Campo

 

[SOT4]

How Laycock is getting votes is beyond me. He was ok but made way too many mistakes.

Hahaha are you serious! Seriously. Laycock was fnatastic in the ruck and when loose in defence. Our bets contested marker.

 

[M29]

3. McPhee
2. Lloyd
1. Monfries

How Laycock is getting votes is beyond me. He was ok but made way too many mistakes.

I agree. Some of his first half 'efforts' were a joke.

 

[Darealrath]

3. Lloyd
2. Campo
1. Mal

 

[bomberlegend2007]

3. McPhee
2. Lloyd
1. Monfries

How Laycock is getting votes is beyond me. He was ok but made way too many mistakes.

I third that he looked like he did'nt want to be there in the First Half

 

[jnash196]

3. Captain
2. La(z)ycock
1. Nash because I love him

 

[kelvin_sheedy]

Hahaha are you serious! Seriously. Laycock was fnatastic in the ruck and when loose in defence. Our bets contested marker.

He only took 5 marks. He had 18 hit outs - Ackland 19.

He cost us about 3 goals directly with some of his weak efforts.

He showed signs again but he was up against Ackland and Setanta so if you can't comprehensively with that duel then geez.....

 

[SOT4]

He only took 5 marks. He had 18 hit outs - Ackland 19.

He cost us about 3 goals directly with some of his weak efforts.

He showed signs again but he was up against Ackland and Setanta so if you can't comprehensively with that duel then geez.....

He also had the most contested possessions on the ground, which ins't bad for such a big guy. He was also instrumental in the first 5 minutes of the thirdquarter when he rovedhis own tap work and sent the ball inside 50. Others seem to agree with you, but i thought he was terrific.

 

[Darealrath]

He only took 5 marks. He had 18 hit outs - Ackland 19.

He cost us about 3 goals directly with some of his weak efforts.

He showed signs again but he was up against Ackland and Setanta so if you can't comprehensively with that duel then geez.....

Lighten the **** up.

 

[bomberstomake8]

He only took 5 marks. He had 18 hit outs - Ackland 19.

He cost us about 3 goals directly with some of his weak efforts.

He showed signs again but he was up against Ackland and Setanta so if you can't comprehensively with that duel then geez.....

shit you realise laycock is much less experienced then ackland? laycock has only played like 40 games.. still developing

 

[The Dustbin]

3. lloyd
2. Laycock
1. Mal

 

[Daytripper]

3. Laycock (dominated in the 3rd 1/4 and was chiefly responsible for our comeback)
2. Lloyd (probably his best game for the season)
1. Mal (the man is a rock)

 

[Bomber32]

3. Lloyd
2. Camporeale
1. Monfries