Votes v Essendon

[foxdog50]

Can Taylor sbe nominated for NAB rising star at 21???

 

[cat_fanatic]

Can Taylor sbe nominated for NAB rising star at 21???

He is not eligible.


5. Selwood (absolute work horse with pristine disposal... fantastic from start to finish)
4. Ablett (Superb all day)
3. Bartel (very good but only started playing well when we were dominating)
2. Stokes
1. Corey

 

[Generalissimo]

5. Ablett
4. Stokes
3. Bartel
2. Selwood
1. Ling

 

[Rosso]

5. Gaz
4. Jimmy
3. Stoka
2. Dinga
1. Kel

Apologies to the other 17 worthy members.

 

[dtrainium]

5 - M Stokes
4 - G Ablett
3 - J Selwood
2 - C Ling
1 - J Bartel

 

[Ricketts]

Didn't think Bartel was that good, despite the possession count. Did he not play much in the centre square or was i just not watching properly?

 

[BigBadCam]

5: Ablett
4: Bartel
3: Stokes
2: Selwood
1: Kelly

 

[bingle]

5. Ablett
4. Selwood
3. Bartel
2. Corey
1. Kelly

special mention 17 other geelong players

 

[bingle]

Didn't think Bartel was that good, despite the possession count. Did he not play much in the centre square or was i just not watching properly?

i don't think he had the deodorant on today because no bomber went near him. Pretty easy day in the office i think. goal in the 3rd quarter was symbolic of his day.

 

[Duskfire]

5) - Stokes
4) - Ablett
3) - Bartell
2) Selwood
1) Kelly

 

[Cohzee]

Didn't think Bartel was that good, despite the possession count. Did he not play much in the centre square or was i just not watching properly?

Got to give him credit for that mark though!

 

[djlowz]

5. Ablett
4. Stokes
3. Bartel
2. Selwood
1. Corey

Very very hard to split the top 5 however that is my perceived order. Apologies to Kelly, Gamble, Chapman and Scarlett.

 

[a.f.k.a.y.o.p.]

He is not eligible.


5. Selwood (absolute work horse with pristine disposal... fantastic from start to finish)
4. Ablett (Superb all day)
3. Bartel (very good but only started playing well when we were dominating)
2. Stokes
1. Corey

Why is he not eligible?
isnt it based on games per season not age???
I think he is and i say he should get the gong!

 

[BigBadCam]

After each round of home and away games, a player is nominated and at the end of the season a panel of experts selects the winner. The winner must be under the age of 21 at January 1 of that year, must not have played more than 10 games to the start of that season and must not have been suspended by the AFL or State League tribunals during the season (as with the Brownlow Medal, players found guilty of certain offences and fined or reprimanded by the Tribunal remain eligible to win the award).

 

[Crancon]

5: Ablett
4: Bartel
3: Stokes
2: Kelly
1: Blake

Apologies to Corey and Selwood.

Congratulations to Taylor on a fine debut.

 

[sarah.13]

5. Kelly - Showing why he was considered better then Jimmy and Gaz before he broke his leg.
4. Bartel - A gun footballer
3. Ablett - Destroyed them in the 1st half.
2. Stokes - what an inspired draft pick, courage and skill
1. Selwood - Just keeps getting better,disposal gone up a notch this year.
Apologies to Corey, Ling,Scarlo and Blake who played his best game so far.

 

[thegerman]

5 - Ablett
4 - Bartel
3 - Stokes
2 - Kelly
1 - Selwood

This list is interchangeable IMO. So many guys in the mid-field stood up and were just brutal. You could easily see the difference with body size and skill level between the Dons and us.

Bad luck for Ling, Gamble, Scarlett and probably half the squad due to squeezing guys into the 5-1 votes. We just generally performed as a team, totally. That is highly enlightening to watch.

 

[Lingsface]

5.Ablett
4.Stokes
3.Bartel
2.Selwood
1.Ling

Very happy with Harry Taylor and Gamble as well, Gamble shaping into the player that we wanted Gardiner to be.

 

[dicleo]

3. Bartel
2. Corey
1. Stokes

 

[DanA]

5. Ablett
4. Stokes
3. Kelly
2. Bartel
1. Selwood