MVP Votes v Melbourne (votes have been counted)

[Groo2]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Hanley
3. Adcock
2. Beams
1. Rich

 

[mINORITY]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black.
4. Rockliff.
3. Adcock.
2. Hanley.
1. Beams.

Agreed

 

[Grade_Zero]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Adcock
3. Rockliff
2. Patfull
1. Hudson

 

[GabbaGirl]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Rockliff
3. Adcock
2. Beams
1. Hudson

 

[Voss the boss]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Rockliff
3. Rich
2. Adcock
1. Merritt

 

[Tassie4ever]

5. Adcock
4. Hanley
3. Black
2. Rockliff
1. Beams

 

[LionMen]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Rockliff
3. Adcock
2. Hudson
1. Hanley

Honorable mentions- Rich, Beams, Maguire, Polkinghorne

 

[LION UP]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Rockliff
3. Hanley
2. Golby
1. McKeever

Maybe I am a bit diff to others but I saw great improvement in the latter 3 and believe they made a huge difference in the outcome - hence my votes .

 

[mikey127]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5 Black
4 Hudson
3 Adcock
2 Beams
1 Patful

 

[Tetris]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Rockliff
3. Adcock
2. Hudson
1. Hanley

 

[Last of the Roys]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Rockliff
4. Hudson
3. Black
2. Hanley
1. Polkinghorne

Apologies to Rich, Adcock, Beams, Golby, Maguire and Patfull and pretty much the rest of the team.

 

[luthor]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5.Black
4.Hanley
3.Rockliff
2.Hudson
1.Merrett

 

[ZoBlitz]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Rockliff
3. Adcock
2. Hanley
1. Hudson

 

[Elixuh]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

Maybe I am a bit diff to others but I saw great improvement in the latter 3 and believe they made a huge difference in the outcome - hence my votes .

Agreed, I thought Golby in particular was very very solid and had a good game.

 

[gwono]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Rich
3. Rockliff
2. Adcock
1. Hanley

/agree

 

[knaf]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

1. Black
2. Rockliff
3. Beams ( rising star nomination?)
4. Hudson
5. Adcock

Apologies to at least 12 other blokes

 

[Van Nostrand]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Adcock
3. Maguire
2. Rockliff
1. Hanley

Honourable mentions to Polkinghorne, Beames and Rich

 

[POBT]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

1. Black
2. Rockliff
3. Beams ( rising star nomination?)
4. Hudson
5. Adcock

Apologies to at least 12 other blokes

Just got to clarify for when voting is counted - does this mean you have Adcock as best on ground and Black as 5th best?

 

[Surly Boy]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Rocky
3. Adcock
2. Rich
1. Beams


Would love to have got Hudson and Hanley in there as well

 

[Rally]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Hudson (underrated performance, commentators didn't say a thing)
3. Adcock
2. Hanley
1. Rich

 

[dlanod]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Adcock
3. Hanley
2. Rockliff
1. McKeever

 

[knaf]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

POBT wrote
1. Black
2. Rockliff
3. Beams ( rising star nomination?)
4. Hudson
5. Adcock

Apologies to at least 12 other blokes
Just got to clarify for when voting is counted - does this mean you have
Adcock as best on ground and Black as 5th best?

Oh! Long time poster, first time voter.

5. Black 4 Rockliff 3 Beams 2 Hudson 1Adcock.

 

[Balony_pony16]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5: Black (vintage)
4: Rockliff (still playing in the seniors???)
3: Beams (Shutdown role with damaging counter attacking)
2: Hanley (poor 1st quarter before lighting up the G)
1: Adcock ( a real leaders game)

 

[POBT]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

POBT wrote
1. Black
2. Rockliff
3. Beams ( rising star nomination?)
4. Hudson
5. Adcock

Apologies to at least 12 other blokes
Just got to clarify for when voting is counted - does this mean you have
Adcock as best on ground and Black as 5th best?

Oh! Long time poster, first time voter.

5. Black 4 Rockliff 3 Beams 2 Hudson 1Adcock.

No worries mate. I thought that's what you meant.

 

[DeMerrett]

Re: Votes v Melbourne

5. Black
4. Rockliff
3. Adcock
2. Hudson
1. Hanley