Votes vs Hawks

[Bombers42]

3 - Lovett-Murray
2 - Lonergan
1 - McVeigh

Monfries, Lovett, Winderlich, Welsh were serviceable.

same

 

[windyhill]

3. Stanton
2. Fletcher
1. Lovett

 

[sen entertainment bloke]

3/ Ryder

2/ Fletcher

1/ Winderlich

 

[Bomber32]

3. Lovett-Murray
2. Fletcher
1. McVeigh

 

[Bombermania]

3 Stanton

2 Flecter

1 Nathan Lovett-Murray

 

[PaintItRedAndBlack]

3. Stanton
2. Lovett-Murray
1. Fletcher

 

[SirJimi05]

3/ Ryder

2/ Fletcher

1/ Winderlich

You said that in jest right?

He only had 7 goals kicked on him.

 

[SirJimi05]

3. Winderlich

2. Lovett-Murray

1. Slattery



* Winderlich was our most damaging player by far. Good to see him getting back to some good form the last few weeks. Match fitness is so important!

* Nat Rat did a great job on Williams tonight. He played his normal attacking type role from defence but seemed to be a lot more accountable than he normally is. I thought he did a great job on Williams.

* This is one bloke i never thought i would be putting in the votes. I am probably the guys biggest critic but i could not fault him tonight. He killed Rioli one on one and got plenty of the ball himself. Quite a few of Rioli's possesions were when Slattery did the unselfish thing and left his opponent to attack the ball carrier. He was also quite clean with his disposal and didn't make his normal blunders.


UNLUCKY - McVeigh, Houli.

 

[SirJimi05]

To be honest i'm surprised so many people have Dustbin in the votes. I thought he was not at his best tonight. Had 5 kicked on him and could have done more to help Ryder on a couple of occasions.

 

[yaco55]

NLM
Welsh
Stanton

 

[sen entertainment bloke]

You said that in jest right?

He only had 7 goals kicked on him.

No jest.

 

[lemon chicken]

3 Houli
2 NLM
1 Slattery

 

[andrew4443]

3. Lovett-Murray
2. Fletcher
1. Monfries - thought he did a really good job on birchall, held him to 9 touches

 

[SirJimi05]

No jest.

Rofl.

 

[Spikey]

votes: -1000 to knights

worst coaching performance i have seen for a while unfortunately..

1.not putting lloyd up the ground when he hadnt got the ball for 70 odd minutes
2. giving a kid his first game and giving him 25% game time (why not play another runner)
3. letting clarkson create 60m worth of space in the forward 50 so ryder can go 1 on 1 with what is one of the best forwards we have seen for long time.

there are many more.. im sorry knights but forcing paddy to play with absolutely no support is just poor coaching, that wont help his development, may actually hinder it. paddy plays on confidence imo how is that going to build confidence

1. He's a FF, Not a CHB or something like that..

2. Um..That's pretty normal for a first game ruckman...

3. 60m of space in the forward 50? What?

 

[Houli2Gumbleton]

Houli was one of the best with 23 possies, 8 marks and 7 tackles.

 

[razor#53]

NLM
Welsh
Winderlich


What does everyone see in stanton and nash?

they are both duds, all stanton does is receive go backwards and turn the ball over, nash is another receiver and a turnover waiting to happen.

Stanton is 1 of the softest players in the league and his ball usage is terrible.

 

[DonMania#5]

3. Stanton
2. NLM
1. Welsh/Fletcher

 

[Wahooti Fandango]

3. Fletcher
2. McVeigh
1. Winderlich

 

[Bombermania]

NLM
Welsh
Winderlich


What does everyone see in stanton and nash?

they are both duds, all stanton does is receive go backwards and turn the ball over, nash is another receiver and a turnover waiting to happen.

Stanton is 1 of the softest players in the league and his ball usage is terrible.

I'm sorry but last night Stants was far from soft

 

[thewhippersnapper]

I'm sorry but last night Stants was far from soft

Exactly. He lead our contested possessions for the night...

 

[stander]

I thought Welsh came back hard last night. It's a good look when your opponent comes off the ground, and Welsh comes off right behind him.

And a coaching tick for Knights for playing Welsh on Mitchell.

 

[Sigmund]

NLM
Welsh
Winderlich


What does everyone see in stanton and nash?

they are both duds, all stanton does is receive go backwards and turn the ball over, nash is another receiver and a turnover waiting to happen.

Stanton is 1 of the softest players in the league and his ball usage is terrible.

Here is a little pearl of wisdom for you Razor.. It is not always wise to come straight onto a board and paste a bloke..

If you are still reading, I will treat you to another pearl of wisdon. It is not always wise to come straight onto a board and paste a bloke.. Especially when that pasting has very little legitimacy. Stanton had an excellent defensive game last night (did you actually watch the game?) I guess if we put two and two together then, I may conclude that you therefore have very little legitimacy.

Please come back when you have something productive (and maybe even positive) to say

 

[bomberlegend2007]

Exactly. He lead our contested possessions for the night...

Yeah, but he would have led the turnover count.

If Stants and Nash work on their skills they will become good players

 

[kelvin_sheedy]

Yeah, but he would have led the turnover count.

If Stants and Nash work on their skills they will become good players

He had 2 clangers and was going at 73% efficiency.

McVeigh had 6 clangers and was going at 75%.

Jordan lewis 3 clangers and 71%.

Perception is a wonderful thing.