Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Dyson was not in our worst three by a long shot.
Try, of the players you didn't list, Monfries, Neagle, Welsh, Atkinson at least who had less output than Dyson.
It's really getting tiresome.
3. Jobe
2. Paddy
1. Jetta
Apologies to Hille, Stants, Lonergan, Reimers and Michael who were all impressive as well.
They were injuredDyson was not in our worst three by a long shot.
Try, of the players you didn't list, Monfries, Neagle, Welsh, Atkinson at least who had less output than Dyson.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
What is the meaning of your comment regarding the injured players Monfries, Neagle and Welsh? Couldn't quite make out what you meant.![]()
They were injured
Dyson has had plenty of chances and continues to fail. Will be likely to get a game next week due to our enormous amount of injuries.
Agree3. Jobe Watson
2. Brent Stanton
1. Sam Lonergan
Sorry to Peverill and Leroy.
I would have to disagree with your minuses. Laycock had 5 shots on goal, unfortunately he had a buddy day with his kicking. Dyson i thought contributed decently, did some nice things. NLM was pretty bad but to say he cant defend is basically saying you barely see him play, he is usually reliable with his disposal as well.3- Watson
2- Stanton
1- Jetta
MINUS
-3= Laycock (**** I have had it, trade him..how he misses not ONE but TWO shots from 10 metres out right in front I'd love to know)
-2= Dyson (don't care that he got the ball..half his turnovers led to Richmond's goals)
-1= NLM (just plain rubbish..got smashed by all opponenents and can't defend)
Note- I thought Pev and Mal did well.
I would have to disagree with your minuses. Laycock had 5 shots on goal, unfortunately he had a buddy day with his kicking. Dyson i thought contributed decently, did some nice things. NLM was pretty bad but to say he cant defend is basically saying you barely see him play, he is usually reliable with his disposal as well.
3. Jobe
2. Stants
1. Leroy
I would have to disagree with your minuses. Laycock had 5 shots on goal, unfortunately he had a buddy day with his kicking. Dyson i thought contributed decently, did some nice things. NLM was pretty bad but to say he cant defend is basically saying you barely see him play, he is usually reliable with his disposal as well.
Yes he had a poor game but he has had a decent year in defence, he did an excellent job on Mark Williams and was great against Tarrant, he has played more good than bad games this year.NLM's "defensive work" cost us at least 6 goals. I don't expect him to stop every one of them, but he should have been at least marking his man. It is not that hard a concept- you mark YOUR man. Pretty simple concept and one NLM struggled with a bit against Richmond.
Agree
FFS give Mal more game time. I suppose we'll have to now anyway, but he does deserve more credit than he gets