Thread starter
#26
A few theories as to why the move in the thread.

- Keep out the riff raff and gouge a bit more money out of some members. It seems that in the year of "I am Carlton" some are more Carlton than others. Given they may lose money from downgrading memberships or even failure to renew and loss of spend in other areas, I'm not sure they will make a great deal.
- The valid issue of vote stacking. As this is illegal under the constitution surely some action should have been taken against individuals proven to have been guilty of it. If it has happened shouldn't they reveal that to the members and if it has happened have any current or past board members benefited. If certain categories of club memberships don't vote in a way the current board approve of, does not in itself have to be vote stacking, perhaps there are other issues and concerns at play. Identifying and addressing those issues, if they exist could be a better solution rather than run the risk of disenfranchising some members. ODN's suggestion of years as a member as part of the qualification could help with the issue.

