Europe War in Ukraine - Thread 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Gethelred

Moderator
May 1, 2016
27,055
53,791
AFL Club
Carlton
Hey all,

Seeing as multiple people seem to have forgotten, abuse is against the rules of BF. Continuous, page long attacks directed at a single poster in this thread will result in threadbans for a week from this point; doing so again once you have returned will make the bans permanent and will be escalated to infractions.

This thread still has misinformation rules, and occasionally you will be asked to demonstrate a claim you have made by moderation. If you cannot, you will be offered the opportunity to amend the post to reflect that it's opinion, to remove the post, or you will be threadbanned and infracted for sharing misinformation.

Finally: If I see the word Nazi or Hitler being flung around, there had better have a good faith basis as to how it's applicable to the Russian invasion - as in, video/photographic evidence of POW camps designed to remove another ethnic group - or to the current Ukrainian army. If this does not occur, you will be threadbanned for posting off topic

This is a sensitive area, and I understand that this makes for fairly incensed conversation sometimes. This does not mean the rules do not apply, whether to a poster positing a Pro-Ukraine stance or a poster positing an alternative view.

Behave, people.
 

footyfan1978

Hall of Famer
Aug 27, 2014
38,196
41,178
spacetime
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
there are no other teams worthy
Anti-Missile rocket fired at a Russian missile landed in Poland.

I doubt article 5 will be activated by Poland…. which would have NATO attack …. ummmm…. Ukraine….
Has this been confirmed? Always a chance that is what it was.
 

kaiserchief13

Hall of Famer
Jul 12, 2011
33,166
24,019
Melbourne
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Eagles, Lakers, Bayern, Trojans
Could NATO say, maybe even off the record, to Russian officials - get rid of Putin, pull your troops back to Russia and we will leave you alone, otherwise we will destroy your country in a few months. What would Russia do then?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

spudmaster

Brownlow Medallist
Feb 13, 2010
19,075
37,682
Melbourne, Victoria
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Coney Island Warriors
Could NATO say, maybe even off the record, to Russian officials - get rid of Putin, pull your troops back to Russia and we will leave you alone, otherwise we will destroy your country in a few months. What would Russia do then?
To me, that plays right into Vlad's "NATO is a threat to Russia" rhetoric and would simply serve to galvanise the powers that be.
 

BobbyMorri

Community Leader
May 4, 2009
11,811
10,799
Tasmania
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Scunny, Furth
US is hinting that is was an anti-air rocket by Ukraine. e will know soon when Ukraine wakes up shortly. They will shift tone quite quickly if this is the case. PR has been Ukraine's best and most effective weapon in this war and Poland is their biggest supporter.

It doesn't change the fact that the Anti-air rocket was only launched because Russia is a big crybaby who loves to bomb cities. Without Putin, this missile would never have been launched.
 

76woodenspooners

Brownlow Medallist
Jun 4, 2011
23,151
36,311
Sydney
AFL Club
Collingwood
They could do that if they want, but doing so would encourage Putin to cross lines and boundaries knowing that there will be no consequences.

Doing something he the risk of giving Putin a propaganda win (Totally unprovoked from NATO!!!)

Russia seems to be struggling for motivation in this war. Best keep it that way.
 

jatz14

Brownlow Medallist
Dec 13, 2011
11,077
15,517
WA
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Perth Glory W-League
US is hinting that is was an anti-air rocket by Ukraine. e will know soon when Ukraine wakes up shortly. They will shift tone quite quickly if this is the case. PR has been Ukraine's best and most effective weapon in this war and Poland is their biggest supporter.

It doesn't change the fact that the Anti-air rocket was only launched because Russia is a big crybaby who loves to bomb cities. Without Putin, this missile would never have been launched.
Definitely a Ukrainian missile.

But as you say, this changes nothing.

If its a Russian missile, fired at Ukraine, that missed, or if its a Ukrainian missile, fired at a Russian missile, that was fired at Ukraine, that missed, its still ultimately on Russia.

And I suspect this will be Poland's take.
 

ep2018

Bigfooty Pessimist
Sep 16, 2006
35,609
35,250
AFL Club
West Coast
Was a fck up by Ukraine apparently, we can all breathe now. RIP the two Polish victims.
 

Mobbs

A Large Portion, Yes
Nov 1, 2000
71,239
80,743
www.footypedia.com/qooty
Other Teams
Fitzroy FC
I momentarily spotted one statement saying Poland spoke of the high likelihood that it was Ukrainian air defence, but haven't had time this morning to find news statements. Anyone know what NATO and/or Ukraine are saying about it? Just in a rush.
 

LittleG

Brownlow Medallist
Nov 18, 2015
10,783
13,367
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
I momentarily spotted one statement saying Poland spoke of the high likelihood that it was Ukrainian air defence, but haven't had time this morning to find news statements. Anyone know what NATO and/or Ukraine are saying about it? Just in a rush.

Polish president Duda:

Duda said during a news conference that the strike was "probably an accident" as Ukraine intercepted a barrage of incoming Russian missiles.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Mobbs

A Large Portion, Yes
Nov 1, 2000
71,239
80,743
www.footypedia.com/qooty
Other Teams
Fitzroy FC
Polish president Duda:

Duda said during a news conference that the strike was "probably an accident" as Ukraine intercepted a barrage of incoming Russian missiles.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, yeah I guess what I saw was a paraphrase of this statement.

Terrible that the loss of lives from this invasion spreads beyond borders like this. One of the biggest arguments UKR has is that they have more accurate weapons :/ It's hoped that they are fully sympathetic and apologetic about this accident.

Would be very interested learn more.This was north of Lviv. I they were aimed at missiles in that general direction, then it suggests maybe the missiles they were looking for came from Belarus ... however maybe they could have been chasing something which was already gone overhead, or maybe it's a reciprocal error (coords sometimes misinterpreted as exact opposite of actual). Maybe they were just skewiff from the get-go.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Zidane98

TheBrownDog
Dec 22, 2009
59,728
33,933
South End, AAMI Park
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
So Ukraine about to be obliterated by the full strength of NATO?

No. They have not attacked anyone. This is a result of a cruise missile bombardment fired from Belarus at Ukraine.


If anything Poland will look to guarantee that Russia can no longer attack western Ukraine so this cannot happen again.
 

Hyakutake

Cancelled
Aug 6, 2018
1,059
3,182
AFL Club
Collingwood
Thanks, yeah I guess what I saw was a paraphrase of this statement.

Terrible that the loss of lives from this invasion spreads beyond borders like this. One of the biggest arguments UKR has is that they have more accurate weapons :/ It's hoped that they are fully sympathetic and apologetic about this accident.

Would be very interested learn more.This was north of Lviv. I they were aimed at missiles in that general direction, then it suggests maybe the missiles they were looking for came from Belarus ... however maybe they could have been chasing something which was already gone overhead, or maybe it's a reciprocal error (coords sometimes misinterpreted as exact opposite of actual). Maybe they were just skewiff from the get-go.

the missile components ive seen are consistent with russian S300 anti air missiles. Ukraine doesnt have enough western weaponry for all its point defence
 

Zidane98

TheBrownDog
Dec 22, 2009
59,728
33,933
South End, AAMI Park
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
the missile components ive seen are consistent with russian S300 anti air missiles. Ukraine doesnt have enough western weaponry for all its point defence

S300's do have a secondary mode which allows them to be fired at ground targets.


However in this mode they are quite inaccurate. Their main purpose is air to air targets.
 

Visions

Brownlow Medallist
Oct 2, 2007
11,413
14,003
2 Bedroom Apartment
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Liverpool FC, HNS Vatreni
So Ukraine about to be obliterated by the full strength of NATO?

Yes, in response to such an attack by UAF forces on Polands integral territory and to ensure security, NATO should invade Ukraine and capture all of it up to the Russian border and bring it under their control…

Well played Ukraine!
 

Visions

Brownlow Medallist
Oct 2, 2007
11,413
14,003
2 Bedroom Apartment
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Liverpool FC, HNS Vatreni
S300's do have a secondary mode which allows them to be fired at ground targets.


However in this mode they are quite inaccurate. Their main purpose is air to air targets.
S-300 missiles are supposed to self destruct in the air if they miss their targets after a specified time. So if it indeed was a Ukrainian one it was the debris after the blast falling on the Polish field which would be less of an impact than a live one hitting.
 

Zidane98

TheBrownDog
Dec 22, 2009
59,728
33,933
South End, AAMI Park
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
S-300 missiles are supposed to self destruct in the air if they miss their targets after a specified time. So if it indeed was a Ukrainian one it was the debris after the blast falling on the Polish field which would be less of an impact than a live one hitting.

They are but they often malfunction. Sibir flight 1812 was destroyed by a S300 that failed to detonate after being fired at a target drone during military drills.
 
Last edited:

Syd

Kiss my Assterisk*
Mar 13, 2003
22,919
13,107
Die Kaffeeklatch
AFL Club
Sydney
No. They have not attacked anyone. This is a result of a cruise missile bombardment fired from Belarus at Ukraine.


If anything Poland will look to guarantee that Russia can no longer attack western Ukraine so this cannot happen again.

IF that is true, then Ukraine would be well within its rights to launch interdiction raids on the launching points and equipment in Belarus
 

ibd77

Norm Smith Medallist
Apr 2, 2014
5,383
7,631
Adelaide, South Australia
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
IF that is true, then Ukraine would be well within its rights to launch interdiction raids on the launching points and equipment in Belarus

They could but they won't as they dont want to fight a front against Belarus which would take away their resources on the eastern front. Ukraine is trusting the air defences to limit the collateral damage in these regions. Ukraine's main focus is to force out the invading force then establish defensive measures to protect their borders. If Belarus continues to allow attacks post this stage, then Ukraine will deal with them directly then with long range weapons to disable their capabilities. Call it Ukraine's "Special Decommissioning of Enemy Military Equipment Operation".
 

bourbons

Brownlow Medallist
Mar 1, 2007
22,601
26,481
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
What's this moral equivalency crap? Zelensky, Putin, Poroshenko and the other vested interests are as culpable as each other. Don't try and run away from or hide from these truths: moral equivalency indeed! They are pigs, each and every one of them.
lol, no

In no way is Zelensky "as culpable" as Putin :drunk:
 

Fire

Brownlow Medallist
Mar 12, 2003
11,351
5,935
New York
AFL Club
North Melbourne
They could but they won't as they dont want to fight a front against Belarus which would take away their resources on the eastern front. Ukraine is trusting the air defences to limit the collateral damage in these regions. Ukraine's main focus is to force out the invading force then establish defensive measures to protect their borders. If Belarus continues to allow attacks post this stage, then Ukraine will deal with them directly then with long range weapons to disable their capabilities. Call it Ukraine's "Special Decommissioning of Enemy Military Equipment Operation".
Belarus would have much more to fear from a Belarussian invasion of Ukraine than Ukraine would.
 

Neale4brownlow

Norm Smith Medallist
May 20, 2017
5,685
9,341
AFL Club
West Coast
US is hinting that is was an anti-air rocket by Ukraine. e will know soon when Ukraine wakes up shortly. They will shift tone quite quickly if this is the case. PR has been Ukraine's best and most effective weapon in this war and Poland is their biggest supporter.

It doesn't change the fact that the Anti-air rocket was only launched because Russia is a big crybaby who loves to bomb cities. Without Putin, this missile would never have been launched.
Even if it was.

Confirmed: Russia fire 90x missiles at Ukraine.....
Confirmed: A Russian made missile hits the edge of Poland in that encounter....

How can Russia categorically then argue it wasn't them and they're being setup? It's ridiculous.

Its the equivalent of arguing with a toddler. Simply accepting it just promotes more outbursts...

Poland/Nato should push their anti-missile defenses into Ukraine in the name of NATO country defense. Either manned directly by Poland, or get the Ukrainians to man them.

Why is it Russia are allowed to fire missiles far and wide over Ukraine and have little recourse? Yet if Ukraine were to do the same back at Russian soil they'd lose their collective minds over it and probably hit the nuke button.
 

ibd77

Norm Smith Medallist
Apr 2, 2014
5,383
7,631
Adelaide, South Australia
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Poland/Nato should push their anti-missile defenses into Ukraine in the name of NATO country defense. Either manned directly by Poland, or get the Ukrainians to man them.

Some SAM sites would have enough range to cover Ukraine's western region from the Polish border. No reason why Poland couldn't assist there as long as they target unmanned aircraft such as cruise missiles.
 

Remove this Banner Ad