- Banned
- #101
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
War over Warnock
- Thread starter go_the_dockers
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Warnock looked all at sea on the news last night. He wants this to be over. Does he have the nerve as a guy in his early 20's to go through the national draft (waiting another few months) and have another team possibly draft him?
I don't think so.
Does Bower make in excess of 350k? If not, then it seems Carlton doesn't think this is the case.
- Banned
- #104
Its cute how he thinks clubs can now keep players whenever they want and that they have total control over the situation
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- May 26, 2003
- 25,399
- 21,625
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- SFFC, Aussie Women's Cricket, HNK
nah, he said: "at this stage it's just Carlton, hopefully my manager will work out a deal with the clubs, but we'll see how it works out."
LennyLeonard
Team Captain
No it is not. Was it a real test for free agency when Nick Stevens wanted to move? Why are so many Carlton supporters so obsessed with everything being a test for free agency, everyone suing to get it implemented and the whole system being about to fall down when they want a player. Are they that narcissistic that they think this system that has worked for quite some time and has never been challenged will suddenly be successfully challenged because there is a player that wants to come to Carlton? It certainly seems that way.
Uni just gets your foot in the door
The costly training comes once you enter the workforce.
He had a contract with Freo - he doesn't want to stay any longer
He moves on - it's business - no point being petulent and getting irrational.
How's this - how about you never change employers your whole life! And if you do - try and get your new employer to pay your old employer a termination fee - good luck with that!
Grow up and realise it's 2008
That is a ridiculous anaology.
Warnock is no different to any other professional with a particular skill set. Do Plumbers have an ongoing interest or right in their apprentice once they've trained them? Do law firms tell their lawyers what to do after articles? No.
The fact of the matter is that employees walk out on businesses that have invested heavily in them all the time. It is incumbent on the business to make them want to stay but sometimes, there is nothing they can do to make them stay and that is just bad luck.
It happens all the time. Yet AFL clubs seem to think they should somehow be able to tell players what to do once their contract is up. It's ridiculous, they're not different to any other employer who has invested in their staff's development and training.
Ryley Dunn was was also taken at a much higher pick and was an under 18 AA, we will throw him in you want. Warnock and Dunn for 6 and bower. I may even accept 24 and bower if you throw another pick in
Of course I can see a preference for drafting locally, but in reality more players are drafted out of state and stay for a significant period of time than not. If you have a good club and good people there, you back yourselves to draft best available and keep them
- Banned
- #112
I wonder what would have happened if Gibbs had come out and said that he wanted to leave the Blues and only wanted to go to say, the Eagles.
The Eagles advised that their first round pick (2) was already committed and was too high a price for a 20 year old - who "looks a gun but isnt there yet and pick 2 really sets us up going forward"
Our best offer is 18 and we think (given its effectively a late first round pick) that its fair. Gibbs refuses to deal with any other club and in fact pisses off overseas.
Everyone tells Carlton that while promising and arguably worth a Top 10 pick (although its a really strong draft), the offer is the best they will get from West Coast and they can take him at 2 in the PSD and the Blues get nothing.
People point out that the Eagles could get a Top 10 pick but, in this draft that would mean giving up a Kerr or Cox .....
So Carlton need to be reasonable, respect the wishes of their player, who looks a gun but with only 20 to 30 games under his belt isnt elite yet and really a late first round pick is probably fair and the best the Eagles can do...
Obviously they can decline, but then its the PSD where (assuming overlooked by the Dees who cant afford his asking price) the Eagles with pick 2 can take him for free.
What would Blues fans think of this?
I mean in light of their dispassionate and independent views that 24 is fair and the best the Blues can do - surely they would see that letting their guy get what he wants in exchange for a pick 18 is all good - yes?
The Eagles advised that their first round pick (2) was already committed and was too high a price for a 20 year old - who "looks a gun but isnt there yet and pick 2 really sets us up going forward"
Our best offer is 18 and we think (given its effectively a late first round pick) that its fair. Gibbs refuses to deal with any other club and in fact pisses off overseas.
Everyone tells Carlton that while promising and arguably worth a Top 10 pick (although its a really strong draft), the offer is the best they will get from West Coast and they can take him at 2 in the PSD and the Blues get nothing.
People point out that the Eagles could get a Top 10 pick but, in this draft that would mean giving up a Kerr or Cox .....
So Carlton need to be reasonable, respect the wishes of their player, who looks a gun but with only 20 to 30 games under his belt isnt elite yet and really a late first round pick is probably fair and the best the Eagles can do...
Obviously they can decline, but then its the PSD where (assuming overlooked by the Dees who cant afford his asking price) the Eagles with pick 2 can take him for free.
What would Blues fans think of this?
I mean in light of their dispassionate and independent views that 24 is fair and the best the Blues can do - surely they would see that letting their guy get what he wants in exchange for a pick 18 is all good - yes?
Or maybe his preference is Carlton, but he will go to Melbourne if no deal with Carlton can be done.
I hope he goes to Melbourne, only because it is much more romantic him going to Melbourne to play with his brother.
Exactly, larrikin. If we bend over for 24, chances are the player we get at 24 might well be a Victorian lad, because picks 18 & 20 will almost certainly be WA boys. Given he's going to be a superstar (based on Blues fans opinions of pick 24), then in 2 years time Carlton will be speaking to his manager.
It was stated on radio last night that we have softened our position from pick 6, which is sensible. We now want a pick inside West Coast's PP/2nd round picks.
Why don't Carlton ask Melbourne what they want for pick 17/19? If pick 24 is not much better than 17/19, what about giving them 24 + fringe. Can't see Melbourne doing that? Me neither. Carlton want cream for the price of water.
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
I didn't know they were Tasmanian.
There is a big difference between offering pick 24 for Warnock, and 18 for Gibbs.
The difference is an insulting offer compared to a reasonable one
Speaking of riduculous analogies. This one is just plain stupid!!! Do lawyers get drafted??? Can they get traded??? The AFL is totally different kettle of fish to a law firm. Why would you even bother comparing them???
Wizard
Brownlow Medallist
I seriously hope the Crows open up the cheque book for Gibbs in coming years and give him an offer he cant refuse, all after the finish bottom and get pick #1 in the PSD.
Shannon Hurn, Ben McKinley, Matthew Spangher, Mitchell Brown, Brad Ebert, and Scott Selwood say hello.
It amuses me that you are obsessed with WCE Eagles picking the eyes out of this WA talent that magically regresses towards 17-23, when they have a strong history of backing their recruiters to best available. Maybe you should take a leaf out of their book?
Cream for the price of water in your opinion. 14 other club officials have said that pick 24 is more than reasonable. I'd back their judgment over yours.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Banned
- #120
Its not like me or you in the work force. A AFL player is more like a house the a employee. Hes a asset which they can on sell to other companies for something of value. If I quit work do I get sold to my next employer...
Soccer teams consider players as assets with monetary value. Why would it be so different for a AFL player
Why?
Rubbish mate, there is 4 picks difference considering the Dockers have one in between. It is very even from late 1st round to the end of the second IMO, Kevin Sheehan recognizes the same things saying 32 of the top players are worthy first rounders, i think he'd have a little more of an idea about talent than you would.
Really? Have you got confirmation of that, or have you gleaned that from a throw away line from Steven Icke on radio 6PR the other evening? And before you say "throw away line"?, yes I did listen to the interview and it was a throw away line.
Wizard
Brownlow Medallist
Stop making shit up FFS. Why are Melbourne willing to part with #19 if 24 is more then reasonable?
- Status
Similar threads
