- Banned
- #1
Was Jed Adcock played out of position? I'd say yes , would have made a great half forward flanker. Who else are we mucking about with? Hanley is one that comes to mind.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Sure he kicked a few bags this year but Adcock definitely wasn't played out of position during his Brisbane career. Appeared a gun midfield prospect initially but found his niche in defence (replacing an injured Chris Johnson if I'm not mistaken?). Fans forgot how solid he was in the back six, was such an important piece throughout some dark times.Was Jed Adcock played out of position? I'd say yes , would have made a great half forward flanker. Who else are we mucking about with? Hanley is one that comes to mind.
Don't get me wrong, Jed was a fine defender, but I think he would have been even better alongside J Brown. If only for his ability to kick so well. And yes they were "dark" times, and as such I would have rather seen him kicking goals, after all we lost anyway, for many years. Imagine the thrills he would have given us.Sure he kicked a few bags this year but Adcock definitely wasn't played out of position during his Brisbane career. Appeared a gun midfield prospect initially but found his niche in defence (replacing an injured Chris Johnson if I'm not mistaken?). Fans forgot how solid he was in the back six, was such an important piece throughout some dark times.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
This was a lad with with so much ability, Daicos like. But you needed the team around him and the coach who believed in a stability, not quick results ala Fev, and a club who looked after our players, all minus at the times. Who knows if his growth path was different.Karnezis was a waste of talent IMO. Once Voss got wind that he was looking to leave he didn't play him which was understandable. Karnezis was just never made for AFL footy being mentally soft and not willing to work hard enough which was also a problem at Collingwood. Could have been a great wing/HFF IMO he just had something about him.
I think if Karnezis had bought in, worked his a** off and didn't run off to his mothers I have no doubt he would be in our best 22. As soon as his intentions were made public his cards were marked. I can't blame Voss and co. for not playing him especially when he is just going to leave at the end of the season I would have done the same.This was a lad with with so much ability, Daicos like. But you needed the team around him and the coach who believed in a stability, not quick results ala Fev, and a club who looked after our players, all minus at the times. Who knows if his growth path was different.
What?Leuenberger comes to mind , also Aish and many others , why can't our selectors get it right. And not forget we sit on the bottom for a decade. Have we changed our ways?
Adcock was played exactly were he should've been for most of his career. Back flank and a bit of midfield. He ended up forward last season purely because others had gone past him in his preferred position. As for Hanley... he's turned into our most damaging midfielder.Was Jed Adcock played out of position? I'd say yes , would have made a great half forward flanker. Who else are we mucking about with? Hanley is one that comes to mind.
Wouldn't say Hanley is our most damaging midfielder just yet. He has shown glimpses yes but so has Rich who I think i probably our most damaging player when he plays well. Hanley needs to get the pill a bit more and it would be great if he can get those extra touches forwrd of centre but I like what he has to offer. Still learning the game and so I'm hoping this season is his break out year especially with a full strength squad he can work off. Here's hoping to AA selection for Hanley.Adcock was played exactly were he should've been for most of his career. Back flank and a bit of midfield. He ended up forward last season purely because others had gone past him in his preferred position. As for Hanley... he's turned into our most damaging midfielder.

What?
I think Hanley's gone past Rich in that regard. Both are susceptible to the tag, but Hanley is a better runner and is more versatile.Wouldn't say Hanley is our most damaging midfielder just yet. He has shown glimpses yes but so has Rich who I think i probably our most damaging player when he plays well. Hanley needs to get the pill a bit more and it would be great if he can get those extra touches forwrd of centre but I like what he has to offer. Still learning the game and so I'm hoping this season is his break out year especially with a full strength squad he can work off. Here's hoping to AA selection for Hanley.![]()
He didn't exactly set the world on fire at Collingwood either. He wasn't as talented as he seemed to think he was, and just couldn't do the kind of basic things you need to do to succeed at AFL level when you're not insanely talented.I think if Karnezis had bought in, worked his a** off and didn't run off to his mothers I have no doubt he would be in our best 22. As soon as his intentions were made public his cards were marked. I can't blame Voss and co. for not playing him especially when he is just going to leave at the end of the season I would have done the same.
That's not what OP said.We wasted alot of picks on speculative types like 3rd talls and flankers and held on to players who were never more than below par or injured.
I'm starting a thread on Potentially wasted time opening wasted potential threads by folk who are potentially wasted.
I think Rich has a higher 'peak' than Hanley but Hanley works harder so I agree.The answer, as always, is Jared Brennan.
I think Hanley's gone past Rich in that regard. Both are susceptible to the tag, but Hanley is a better runner and is more versatile.
He didn't exactly set the world on fire at Collingwood either. He wasn't as talented as he seemed to think he was, and just couldn't do the kind of basic things you need to do to succeed at AFL level when you're not insanely talented.
What facebook post was that?I think Rich has a higher 'peak' than Hanley but Hanley works harder so I agree.
I disagree somewhat with Karnezis. I actually thought he was fairly talented but lacked the drive to succeed... as that facebook post was floating around shows it seemed as though he had a tendency to blame everyone but himself. Mentally weak IMO.
Potentially wasted thread.
![]()