Watts a defender: Neeld

The Dr

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Posts
4,516
Likes
3,140
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
Thread starter #1
Not sure if this is mentioned elsewhere, so if it is, mods please move/merge.

But interesting to see Mark Neeld label Watts a defender, and plans to play him there next year.

"We see Jack as that defender - that’s where he played the majority of the year,” he said. “We see Jack as forming part of the back six.”

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/7415/newsid/149843/default.aspx

I like this. Gives Watts a clear picture of what Neeld's plans are rather than being uncertain of his role for next season. We need his foot skills coming out of the backline, while it's obvious Jack has played his best, most impactful footy down back.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

dee64

Club Legend
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Posts
1,366
Likes
673
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
#2
If Neeld had of said this at the start of last season, I would have been furious. But after what we saw this year, Watts can utilise his assets far better in the backline than as a key forward. I think that Neeld sees him as an ideal replacement for Rivers. Watts will provide greater run and creative disposal, whereas Rivers is better as a 3rd man up in the contest.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Posts
46
Likes
8
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Burnley F.C.
#3
For the short term settling him in one position is definitely a wise thing to do. He does have plenty to offer down back with his intercept marking, speed and kicking skills. All things we currently lack in the back half.
 

DeeWong6996

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 22, 2011
Posts
5,059
Likes
1,657
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
#4
Our backline is becoming excessively tall. I know they can all play small to some extent, but this would surely be exploited by opposition teams.

McDonald, Frawley, Rivers, Garland and Watts. Even without Rivers 4 talls is quite unique.
 
Joined
May 30, 2005
Posts
5,691
Likes
3,244
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Socceroos,Wallabies, Glenn McGrath.
#5
Could be a bit of a Neitz story here. Play him down back for the next couple of years, let him put on some more size, then see how he goes as a forward. What I'm most glad about is that Neeld has stated a few times that Watts was not handled properly at the beginning of his career (and that he's working on fixing that).
 

Eth

Parle à ma main
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
15,692
Likes
10,107
Location
Over there
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Mt Buller Demons, Vic Metro
#6
Our backline is becoming excessively tall. I know they can all play small to some extent, but this would surely be exploited by opposition teams.

McDonald, Frawley, Rivers, Garland and Watts. Even without Rivers 4 talls is quite unique.
Assuming Rivers goes, which I think he will.

McDonald and Frawley take the two talls. Garland takes a medium/small as he's started to do more frequently. Watts takes a medium or a second key forward if there's a resting ruck and floats off.

We'll be right.
 

DeeWong6996

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 22, 2011
Posts
5,059
Likes
1,657
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
#8
Assuming Rivers goes, which I think he will.

McDonald and Frawley take the two talls. Garland takes a medium/small as he's started to do more frequently. Watts takes a medium or a second key forward if there's a resting ruck and floats off.

We'll be right.
Although the above doesn't sound too bad, 4-5 190cm+ players in the back half still seems a little bit dangerous if you ask me. If the ball hits the deck, you'd be praying that a tackle could be laid. I still think 3 is perfect medium with McDonald, Frawley and one of Rivers/Garland/Watts.
 

Eth

Parle à ma main
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
15,692
Likes
10,107
Location
Over there
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Mt Buller Demons, Vic Metro
#9
Although the above doesn't sound too bad, 4-5 190cm+ players in the back half still seems a little bit dangerous if you ask me. If the ball hits the deck, you'd be praying that a tackle could be laid. I still think 3 is perfect medium with McDonald, Frawley and one of Rivers/Garland/Watts.
Garland, Watts and to a lesser extent Frawley are perfectly capable below their knees.
 

DeeWong6996

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 22, 2011
Posts
5,059
Likes
1,657
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
#10
Completely irrelevant but I am quietly confident Rivers will stay. Geelong only have two days to secure both McIntosh and Rivers whilst moving on one of Gillies/Brown (for a senior spot).
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Andy_Mac

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Posts
5,337
Likes
2,969
Location
Torquay
AFL Club
Melbourne
#12
We drafted a sheep dog at one.

That said, he's played his best football as that loose man zoning off and packing up the loose ball. He is also about the only bloke back there who I trust by foot!!
 

tynanshinin

Team Captain
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Posts
370
Likes
12
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Melbourne
#16
Our backline is becoming excessively tall. I know they can all play small to some extent, but this would surely be exploited by opposition teams.

McDonald, Frawley, Rivers, Garland and Watts. Even without Rivers 4 talls is quite unique.
Honestly i'm 50/50 over garlands worth... maybe its just because he has no left foot or that I'd rather tynan or Nicho played on the players he generally gets
 

Tulip

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
31,600
Likes
25,120
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Tottenham
#17
Our backline is becoming excessively tall. I know they can all play small to some extent, but this would surely be exploited by opposition teams.

McDonald, Frawley, Rivers, Garland and Watts. Even without Rivers 4 talls is quite unique.
This is why I don't mind Rivers leaving, deep down.
 
Joined
Sep 13, 2001
Posts
13,718
Likes
2,038
Location
Tin Shed at Junction Oval
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Denver Nuggets, Man Utd.
#20
I get the thinking, but I still think he should be given some midfield time as well.

If we can get a classy 6'5" midfielder running through I would be so happy.
I reckon he will - Neeld might want him as a defender but I can still see him running up and down the wings.

For the record I like the move, but it doesn't mean he will stay there all year. Will help his growth as a player.
 
Top Bottom