- Thread starter
- #51
You can say that again. The worst thing is he helped himself without asking which means he fits in well down at St. Kildabigman said:Watts has given us a definite rogering
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
You can say that again. The worst thing is he helped himself without asking which means he fits in well down at St. Kildabigman said:Watts has given us a definite rogering
Stiffy_18 said:Yes pick 17 is bad. Numbers wise is around the mark but 2003 draft was considerably stronger than this year's draft. Pick 17 this year is equivelant of pick 25 in 2003. I am sorry but thats just not good enough. Either they come to the party or let the little prick go to Carlton where he is sure to enjoy a lot of success![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Stiffy_18 said:Are we really that surprised by all this??????
This has been as obvious as the nose on the face. We either get what we want or let the little ******** end up at carlton.
tinman said:I know this is a lose/lose/lose scenario - the only winner is Carlton as the Crows, Saints and Fergus all lose - but I reckon that is better than being screwed over.
Why so glum - this is great news - the cards in our hand just started looking a whole lot betterStiffy_18 said:Watts has said he either gets traded to St. Kilda or he walks. Why doesn't this announcement surprise me?
The best we will get our of St. Kilda is pick 17 and to be honest thats just not enough. Sam Fisher and pick 17 don't excite me either
There is nothing on their list that is gettable that excitese me. I would love one of their onballers or Kozi but there is as much chance of us getting it as there is of me kicking 100 goals for the Crows next year (Although I am available)
Crow-mosone said:The real bottom line:
Adelaide: can afford to let him go for nothing
St Kilda: Their ultimate aim is to get him to St Kilda and why would we want to make them any stronger?
Who would you want from St. Kilda??????Wayne's-World said:Why so glum - this is great news - the cards in our hand just started looking a whole lot better
Forget pick 17 - we will get a player and IMO now a pretty good deal if you are correct in his team preferance
Look Sam Fisher is a good utility who St Kilda will be prepared tp off load.Stiffy_18 said:Yes daddy's boy is managed by Max Stevens.
Macca19, Sam Fisher will be 24 next year. Thats not young in football terms. Secondly being a reasonable CHF for Westies doesn't transplate to AFL. He just doesn't have the scope to play CHF at AFL level. He would be Scott Stevens like CHF at AFL level. Frankly, you don't win anything with that play in key attacking position.
Why do we need to settle for an average mid-age footballer and an average draft pick. I am sorry but we get off second best here. I rather he walks than get bent over at the draft table.
My initial reaction was, I want Xavier Clarke but what are the chances of St. Kilda breaking up 2 brothers? I reckon slim.Wayne's-World said:Look Sam Fisher is a good utility who St Kilda will be prepared tp off load.
But he is not the KPP we need to replace Watts.
Give me Xavier Clark - gee looked at the St Kilda list - not much frankly I would want that would be available.
Goddard is the only other possibility BUT Clarke gives us pace and IMO has been held back by St Kildas glut of good players - Speedy midfielder![]()
snakebite01 said:That's the one reason I reckon this could work out well for us, Macca.
If it has been arranged by Jim, which seems pretty likely now, what are the chances of him being stubborn against Adelaide's demands and saying that Fergus can go elsewhere? Pretty low I would have thought.
Watt's old man has organised the reunion, now he's got to complete it. And he ain't going to do that unless he and the Saints satisfy our demands.
Please Kosi.![]()
I was worried by the bottom 3 clubs who have priority picks - Iam not worried bya club that is behind us in the draft pecking order.Stiffy_18 said:Last time the player said its club X or bust, it didn't end up to well. Stevens ended up with Carlton and not Collingwood and Jade Rawlings ended up with Western Bulldogs instead of Kangaroos.
I'm with youStiffy_18 said:My initial reaction was, I want Xavier Clarke but what are the chances of St. Kilda breaking up 2 brothers? I reckon slim.
Fisher is NOT someone we need. He isn't good enough for a key forward and he wouldn't break into our back 6.
SAY NO TO GODDARD!!!!!!![]()
That is a serious option V pick 17NorthBhoy said:Make St Kilda bleed for him.
If they fall short, send him to Carlton. And then watch him squirm through years of rubbish.
And laugh.
Porthos said:You know I have no love for the Crows, but this is an absolute ********ing ******** of a thing to do, and you have my heartfelt commisserations that you crossed paths with such a ******** of a human being.
I disagree, letting Stevens walk is one of the very few things I respect Port for. I'd rather get nothing than pick 34.just maybe said:Wrong. We look like absolute bloody idiots for getting nothing, exactly like Port did.
Port claimed they will now be shown 'respect' for losing Stevens for nothing. They didn't, and no one gives a crap, and everyone else just laughs at them for getting nothing.
There is NO win in pride here. I'd rather develop a good kid with pick 17 than get nothing, if that's what it comes to.
Wayne's-World said:That is a serious option V pick 17