what was the justification of making it 160k? yeah, would look nice on GF day, but for most random games during the home and away season, it would look so empty, like melbourne v freo at the mcg today only worse... its still melbourne, with a small population compared to other major cities in the world
100 k would have been more realistic to complement the MCG, perhaps alternating the GF between the venues each year
It's like at pro wrestling events where they run a 15,000 seat stadium and only get 6,500 through the doors. They tarp off the hard camera side and move everyone on camera, but more pointedly for this discussion, they move everyone to level one and tarp off the upper levels. Looks full on camera (if you aren't really looking for signs it is otherwise), even though it is nowhere near so.
If Richmond played Freo there in a 160,000 seat stadium, they would just lay everyone out on level one, perhaps level two behind the goals. Would be fine.
As it was, the original design was flawed, and the existence of the MCG meant it never was able to be altered to a design that would have been legitimately viable.
I miss Waverley, not gunna lie. It was always a retro looking place and a sad reminder of what they could have done.