Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think their sustainable economies idea comes from "But we have more people tho"
Look, Football forum i wont be popular, I dont think the Stadium was the right deal. I think we should of let the Packers foot a lot more money into it.
Building Infastructure is fine, We got a few hospitals which was fine (sort of, We might get a financial windfall with suing John Holland over the water contamination) The Roe 8 Signing before the election was criminal.
4 Years ago a lot of people knew the Iron ore price would tank, The Government still Budgeted Iron Ore making between 100+ a tonne and the royalties made of it, Then when it tanked down to 90ish, they copped it, When whey only downgraded it to about 90 for the next year it tanked to 60, They are going to write off about 1.5 Billion off the value between 2017-2020 next Budget.
Not great times, Now yes/no We deserve more GST, def should be a floor, because the difference now between 34c and 38c is a blow, a floor of 50c would be great.
However the Fed's wont risk losing 3-4 seats in W.A. then the 10+ it will lose in Queensland, Victoria,NSW cutting the GST.
That astounds me. How could qld achieve that?
Not only did coal go sky high in price and volume but the royalties are probably double that of What is normal.
A remarkable achievement!
Just a balanced budget would be an achievement in itself!In NSW the property boom brought in billions more than expected yet every year Labor had us further in debt.
The challenge is finding a govt capable of running a surplus.
Just a balanced budget would be an achievement in itself!
Financially independent within the Commonwealth is hardly seccession though is it? This looks a lot like a kiddo threatening to leave home if he doesn't get more pocket money, I'd be willling to wager the threat is about as empty as well.
In NSW the property boom brought in billions more than expected yet every year Labor had us further in debt.
The challenge is finding a govt capable of running a surplus.
In NSW the property boom brought in billions more than expected yet every year Labor had us further in debt.
The challenge is finding a govt capable of running a surplus.
Which has roots in one of the original driving forces for Federation - fear of the Yellow Peril.Another great one is, WA couldn't secede because it couldn't afford a multi-class naval force to protect itself. Apart from the fact that a financial autonomy model would share defence costs, the idea that states can only defend themselves with boondoggle naval power is ridiculous.
Which has roots in one of the original driving forces for Federation - fear of the Yellow Peril.
The need for Federation on this continent is implicitly xenophobic.
Amirite saying ladies weren't included in the federation vote?Which has roots in one of the original driving forces for Federation - fear of the Yellow Peril.
The need for Federation on this continent is implicitly xenophobic.
Amirite saying ladies weren't included in the federation vote?
WA gets outvoted on just about any issue in Federal Parliament or COAG. Paying in to Federation evens the ledger a bit. Besides, most people on here are fine with the EU and it would remain more integrated than that. Given the different development goals of the West and East that aren't being addressed at the moment, giving WA more autonomy to develop the North and Great Southern could overall increase the prosperity of all Australians. At the moment there's limited Federal resources for development directed to the West.
Obviously there's some pretty serious issues with leaving a tax union but most of the commentary within WA and outside has been hysterical and/or dishonest. At first they'll acknowledge that the proposal isn't to leave the Australian Commonwealth altogether and next minute that it could never work because it would cost too much money to set up a separate currency when that isn't on the table. Another great one is, WA couldn't secede because it couldn't afford a multi-class naval force to protect itself. Apart from the fact that a financial autonomy model would share defence costs, the idea that states can only defend themselves with boondoggle naval power is ridiculous.
There needs to be some real thought in to balancing Federation or this issue will keep resurfacing and opportunities to make Australia stronger will be lost.
Having your cake and eating it too isn't an option. The Brexiteers have all discovered that.
The need for Federation on this continent is implicitly xenophobic.
It's not comparable in that way to Brexit. In this scenario WA would remain entirely within "the EU" or the Commonwealth of Australia in this case.
Not at all. The fear of Chinese immigration was a significant factor for Federation. It's why we have the race powers in our constitution, it's why one of the first articles of legislation was the White Australia Policy.Poe's law in action.
Not at all. The fear of Chinese immigration was a significant factor for Federation. It's why we have the race powers in our constitution, it's why one of the first articles of legislation was the White Australia Policy.
Making sure every state was part of the Federation was essential to ensuring that the Chinaman couldn't settle on this continent. If one state went it alone, then the Chinese could legally immigrate to say, Queensland, and be at the borders of the other states.
Many of the arguments against WA leaving are made from the point of view of xenophobia. WA leaving would leave them open from foreign aggression, it would be done in the interests of foreign mining companies, it would allow the WA mining barons to employ foreign labour well below award.So would you be willing to ammend your statement to:
The need for Federation on this continent was implicitly xenophobic.
?
That is at least a starting point which someone could argue.
What benefit does the rest of Australia get from that arrangement?