Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch Wayne Milera

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmndstab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back to the two's for Wayne. Not sure what is going with him but he needs to develop more than one string to his bow.
 
I was initially exited but soft as butter with zero work ethic. Bad couple of years from Ogilvie.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Mike Smyth said:
I was initially exited but soft as butter with zero work ethic. Bad couple of years from Ogilvie.
Click to expand...

He's a rake of a kid in his second year. We needed outside players because we were overloaded with inside grunt. Finally get one and people unload shit.

Great work.
 
FantasticShirt said:
He's a rake of a kid in his second year. We needed outside players because we were overloaded with inside grunt. Finally get one and people unload shit.

Great work.
Click to expand...

Yeah that's way off the mark

Being outside doesn't mean soft, and 2nd year doesn't mean soft, and being a whippet doesn't mean soft

He needs to work on that side of his game. A lot.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Sanders said:
Your words - do you want to revise them?
Click to expand...
Actually, I might revise them. "Not a dud" is my understated way of saying I think he's good. Like "Sloaney goes alright". I can see your point about the language, but Lever is certainly good enough for it not to have been a bad pick.
 
dogs105 said:
No.

There's no justification for saying Ogilvie had a bad year with the Lever pick.
Click to expand...

You're very confused, as is often the case when you're forced to talk actual footy related subjects

Mike was suggesting the ogilvie era wasn't all that crash hot and you pointed to Lever as some great shining success that outweighed everything

When asked how good you thought he was you replied "not a dud" as if that was even a vaguely cogent response to the context you responded to

Lever is at present maybe par for his draft cost, but sitting on the edge and could go either way

I don't think Rendell is worried too much about his record just yet.
 
Sanders said:
You're very confused, as is often the case when you're forced to talk actual footy related subjects

Mike was suggesting the ogilvie era wasn't all that crash hot and you pointed to Lever as some great shining success that outweighed everything

When asked how good you thought he was you replied "not a dud" as if that was even a vaguely cogent response to the context you responded to

Lever is at present maybe par for his draft cost, but sitting on the edge and could go either way

I don't think Rendell is worried too much about his record just yet.
Click to expand...
See other post. I agree my language was confusing/confused.
 
Sanders said:
You're very confused, as is often the case when you're forced to talk actual footy related subjects

Mike was suggesting the ogilvie era wasn't all that crash hot and you pointed to Lever as some great shining success that outweighed everything

When asked how good you thought he was you replied "not a dud" as if that was even a vaguely cogent response to the context you responded to

Lever is at present maybe par for his draft cost, but sitting on the edge and could go either way

I don't think Rendell is worried too much about his record just yet.
Click to expand...
And I didn't think Lever was a giant success that outweighed anything. I just asked whether he thought Lever or Gallucci was the bad pick to make Ogilvie's "two bad years".

Don't feel you need to force me to talk about footy. Feel free to ignore my posts - especially if you agree that Ogilvie has had "2 bad years".
 
Will be an absolute gun one day. I can see why the club are trying to get games into him while they can like they did with Cameron, Atkins, Knight etc, but....

...............right now he's not good enough for AFL level and the team is carrying him. Against Port and Hawthorn he made a number of costly mistakes and lacked the necessary attack on the ball for the elite level. Needs another 2-3 pre-seasons in him before we will really see his potential emerge.

Right now he's just a slightly younger David Mackay.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom