Remove this Banner Ad

We got Nick Gill

  • Thread starter Thread starter treeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I'd like to echo Drummond's comments. The only reason this is slightly disappointing is because Westhoff was still available. I rate him quite highly. Campbell should be OK, but I don't really think we could have done any better at that pick. Maybe Dean Kelly? I don't know. The only other pick, I'm uncertain about is McKay because I can't really remember seeing him play. I was hoping Allen would be coming our way with that pick. But if McKay was best available, so be it.

Trust in Neil.
 
I think people need to add a bit of perspective on what pick we took him at

if you get a young guy that late in the draft chances are he ain't going to make it anyhow

you do not get 100% strike rate at drafts so if you already know what to expect - which is what you get with Gill and to a lesser point Bryce you improve you chances of a "successful" draft


Exactly. I was **********ed off early today that we drafted him but the odds are against a player taken with pick 64 being much chop anyway.

Good luck to him.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

2 Great points there. After thinking about it for a couple of hours now I think it is a very smart move. It just gives us another option.

I wonder if our poor cousins at Alberton would have snapped him up if we didn't?
 
Thurstans. (around the same time he was having some "off field troubles")



1065357563_espsdblack.jpg


Ahh you mean the other "off field" issue.
 
Exactly. I was **********ed off early today that we drafted him but the odds are against a player taken with pick 64 being much chop anyway.

Good luck to him.

Youd get an arguement from James Hird; picked up at 79.
If hes half the player Jimmy boy is I'll be happy.
Lets give him a go eh:confused:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom