jmorg1
Norm Smith Medallist
Well after one round some Port Power supporters were calling us a 'rabble'. So if a team that loses in round 1 is a 'rabble', what is a team that loses in round 3 to the 'rabble'?
***** weak POWER!
- Thread starter Jimbob
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Well after one round some Port Power supporters were calling us a 'rabble'. So if a team that loses in round 1 is a 'rabble', what is a team that loses in round 3 to the 'rabble'?
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2005
- Posts
- 24,557
- Reaction score
- 55
- Location
- Mo Mansions LA
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- adelaide
- Banned
- #27
how many games in a row now, have the umpires cheated tredders when he played on Rutten.
you're such a whiny little bitch,
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2006
- Posts
- 18,009
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Heppenheim
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sebastian Vettel
- Banned
- #28
Port Adelaide Average Age \ Games: 24.9 \ 93.6
Adelaide Average Age \ Games: 25.2 \ 94.0
Guess that .3 year and .4 game really makes a huge difference.
I'm sure you meant list, but it's unfortunate that the whole list doesn't come to the game to play, so not sure how that's relevant.
(Not that I care much for Adelaide, but really...)
C'mon, be fair.
Don't destroy their number 1 excuse.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2005
- Posts
- 24,557
- Reaction score
- 55
- Location
- Mo Mansions LA
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- adelaide
- Banned
- #29
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
agree.
I'd rather tredrea in your team too
I'm pretty sure you wouldn't have said that in 2004.
Thats why we win premierships and your last one is on VHS.
You are a dickbrain. 25% of Crows list unavailable, 21 to 11 free kicks Ports way. What more do you need to win.
LOOOOOOOOSERS
You are a dickbrain. 25% of Crows list unavailable, 21 to 11 free kicks Ports way. What more do you need to win.
Alright fine season over..? i dont think i said anything about free kicks there? Most of them were there though because of the pressure our midfield put on yours when we made a comeback. You know who we had out today dont you>
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2006
- Posts
- 2,696
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Sydney
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood Football Club
Laughable! Adelaide's outs are far more valuable than Motlop and Pearce.
Motlop? ... It could've have gotten a lot uglier. You might not even have scored a goal
It should of got uglier but it didn't. Thats the difference between us last year and this year.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2006
- Posts
- 2,696
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Sydney
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood Football Club
Pearce is a gun. Motlop however ....
Johncock >> Pearce
Shirley = Pearce
Ricciuto >> Pearce
Biglands - Different Players, complete different positions, can't really compare
Hentschel > Pearce
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2005
- Posts
- 24,557
- Reaction score
- 55
- Location
- Mo Mansions LA
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- adelaide
- Banned
- #40
well, good to see you living in the past.
plural? so you're living in the past, and in the future. everywhere else but today. with such a loose grip on reality no wonder you're such a bandwagoner.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2006
- Posts
- 3,366
- Reaction score
- 105
- Location
- Brunsy
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Portland Trail Blazers
Get your hand off it, the difference is negligible. A valid reason for why you aren't going to win is simple, you aren't good enough. Stick to that.
Most people besides Adelaide supporters would have pearce out of all them. The only one i would consider is Johncock the rest i couldn't give a stuff about because they are aging or over-rated like more then half of your squad. To say you would currenty rather Ricciuto then Pearce is laughable!!
Pearce is a gun. Motlop however ....
Motlop obviously isn't at pearces standards but has definitely shown signs lately. He kept us in the game against Fremantle.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
jmorg1
Norm Smith Medallist
So if Port Adelaide had an under 12s side up against the Adelaide Crows and lost. You wouldn't say it's because of the age factor..
Are you an idiot? Someone has already posted that the Power side on average were only .3 years younger than the Crows. WTF are you on about?
Are you an idiot? Someone has already posted that the Power side on average were only .3 years younger than the Crows. WTF are you on about?
3 years is abit considering it's like a 5 years difference between the oldest and the youngest teams in the comp. I wonder what the match experience was between the 2 sides?
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2006
- Posts
- 3,366
- Reaction score
- 105
- Location
- Brunsy
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Portland Trail Blazers
Dude, you're a ****er.So if Port Adelaide had an under 12s side up against the Adelaide Crows and lost. You wouldn't say it's because of the age factor..
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2006
- Posts
- 3,366
- Reaction score
- 105
- Location
- Brunsy
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Portland Trail Blazers
0.4 games, but stick to the OH NOES BUTS THEY WAS SO YOUNGS AND ALLS, you might get somebody who agrees with you.
jmorg1
Norm Smith Medallist
Yes, you are an idiot. That's .3 as in 0.3 years as in 3.6 months. NOT 3 years.
Please tell me how a difference of 0.3 years in average age is a valid excuse for your team losing?
Oh yeah, and match experience:
Average games for Port: 93.6
Average games for Crows: 94.0
A whole 0.4 games difference. Yes that's 0.4 games, not 4,000 games.
Yes, you are an idiot. That's .3 as in 0.3 years as in 3.6 months. NOT 3 years.
Please tell me how a difference of 0.3 years in average age is a valid excuse for your team losing?
Oh yeah, and match experience:
Average games for Port: 93.6
Average games for Crows: 94.0
A whole 0.4 games difference. Yes that's 0.4 games, not 4,000 games.
So we are still younger and have less match experience. My points still valid.
