Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Welcome Jamie Cripps (traded with Pick 46 for Picks 41+44 in 2012)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

shame, could've kept pick 17 and traded 25 to collingwood for Wellers instead. Vozzo must have suffered from an Itchy trigger finger.

We had no idea all of a sudden Brown was going to ask for a trade and we would be trying to rush 2 trades in the last couple of hours instead of one.

Cripps + Hooker + 25 I would see as a win. I don't really rate Hooker (granted I haven't seen all that much of him) but a few on here do and I'll back the brains trust if they think he is a good get.

Although Cripps being potentially free in the draft in slightly annoying. :D
 
No chance you would get all three for Brown. That pick 25 would be going to us to get Hooker, two picks in the 40's wont get it done as its very unlikely we would use that many picks.
We had no idea all of a sudden Brown was going to ask for a trade and we would be trying to rush 2 trades in the last couple of hours instead of one.

Cripps + Hooker + 25 I would see as a win. I don't really rate Hooker (granted I haven't seen all that much of him) but a few on here do and I'll back the brains trust if they think he is a good get.

Although Cripps being potentially free in the draft in slightly annoying. :D
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

No chance you would get all three for Brown. That pick 25 would be going to us to get Hooker, two picks in the 40's wont get it done as its very unlikely we would use that many picks.

Cripps and Hooker for Brown is 'meh'.

We could get Cripps in all likelihood for free in the draft, straight swapping Brown for Hooker is neither here nor there, I actually rate Brown higher but to be fair haven't seen enough of Hooker recently.
 
Cripps and Hooker for Brown is 'meh'.

We could get Cripps in all likelihood for free in the draft, straight swapping Brown for Hooker is neither here nor there, I actually rate Brown higher but to be fair haven't seen enough of Hooker recently.

Hooker coming in worries me as I think he's too similar to Mackenzie in some respects. Brown and Mackenzie as a duo moving forward makes me a whole lot more comfortable.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I'd have no issue if Hooker comes in - he is a like for like replacement for Brown.

I would like a draft pick selection as well - as Hooker for Brown is just a straight swap of talent and we can get Cripps in the draft late - so we really aren't being compelled to trade
 
Hooker coming in worries me as I think he's too similar to Mackenzie in some respects. Brown and Mackenzie as a duo moving forward makes me a whole lot more comfortable.

Agreed. Especially with Schofield as the third tall.

If we lose Brown and don't replace him with a mature KPD, I would be interested to see how Schofield goes as a 2nd KPD when Glass retires. He could put on a few Kgs. He might make a real attacking style KPD, which might actually improve the team.

Anyway, I hope we keep Brown.
 
Wouldn't be against Hooker coming in...but would he be happy being a depth player like Brown would be till Glass retires? I mean he was getting quite a few games at the Bombers and is 24 and don't think he will want to come home to play maybe 6-7 games for the year? At least with Brown we can put him Forward if we have to play him somewhere.
 
Agreed. Especially with Schofield as the third tall.

If we lose Brown and don't replace him with a mature KPD, I would be interested to see how Schofield goes as a 2nd KPD when Glass retires. He could put on a few Kgs. He might make a real attacking style KPD, which might actually improve the team.

Anyway, I hope we keep Brown.

In my humble opinion Schofield isn't a lock down KPP's arseh*le. He difference in his worth as a KPP versus a rebounding defender is astronomical.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Welcome Jamie Cripps (traded with Pick 46 for Picks 41+44 in 2012)

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top