If a coach makes an argument which is compelling enough that it has the recruiter overriding his own talent order, do we really blame the coach for having an opinion or do we blame the recruiter for getting sucked into the argument? Ultimately Hamish was the one with the authority to make the call so surely he is one who's ultimately accountable*.Not even when Phil Bunn then a Crows recruiter said that was the case in a public interview on trade radio?
(* Unless our managment was so ass backward that it actually allowed Pyke to override the recruiters unilaterally)