lol at Mick Warner sitting on his pathetic Simon Lethlean "Bombshell emails scandal" story until we announced him as our CEO.
Had to print it today anyway.....to nobody's interest lol
Poor deflated Mick.
What a ******* grub
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lol at Mick Warner sitting on his pathetic Simon Lethlean "Bombshell emails scandal" story until we announced him as our CEO.
Had to print it today anyway.....to nobody's interest lol
Poor deflated Mick.
Collingwood ?1981 called, it wants its joke back.
He''s bloody useless. His opinion means nothing. He should stick to the MRP.Cheeky bugger.
Let's cross our fingers we get the last laugh.
I don't follow Chip.Chip got a tweet from me.
Just keep buying them Carlton stuff.I'm working on two at the moment - nephews in a Carlton/Richmond house.
How does his role at aligned fitness relate to his new role at Carlton. Going off that you’d have to assume he’d have to step down if it’s an owned entity of Richmond.
The older one has been very pro blues to date, but has started to realise other people like different teams. So far I think he is trolling us (he's 3) but he is starting to think he has a choice in the matter.Just keep buying them Carlton stuff.
Good luck.
Happy enough with the appointment but the proof will be in the pudding.
It's too easy to distrust both journalists and clubs. In this case I believe the journo's narrative that Lethlean basically had the job when they sacked Trigg and the board back flipped. Our own solid ITK poster also ran with it. I'm absolutely happy to be proven wrong but that's the most likely truth from what I've seen/read/heard.
If so, as a member I've lost a lot of confidence in the board. As I said above, I am happy for them to clarify & prove me wrong.
Maybe MLG didn't go on SEN because of how they acted after the Trigg announcement.
Maybe he has no need to front the media at all, but given this was a terrific opportunity to sell the virtues of the boards decision, is it an opportunity missed, or could it just add more fuel to the speculation of how and why this appointment came about?
We know MLG isn't a good spokesperson for the CFC and maybe it was his decision to clamp-up or maybe it was others adding weight for him to do so.
Damned either way. Those who went hard early are still looking to justify their position rather than give credit for the outcome. A CEO isn't going to inspire supporters. Bugger all marketing opportunity to be had and what there is, will be on our website.
I'm sure Liddle himself will front the media and they can't ask him about Trigg or his hiring process.
Damned either way. Those who went hard early are still looking to justify their position rather than give credit for the outcome. A CEO isn't going to inspire supporters. Bugger all marketing opportunity to be had and what there is, will be on our website.
I'm sure Liddle himself will front the media and they can't ask him about Trigg or his hiring process.
Mr Liddle, meet Mr AlotA liddle disappointed that no one has made puns about his name yet
Happy enough with the appointment but the proof will be in the pudding.
It's too easy to distrust both journalists and clubs. In this case I believe the journo's narrative that Lethlean basically had the job when they sacked Trigg and the board back flipped. Our own solid ITK poster also ran with it. I'm absolutely happy to be proven wrong but that's the most likely truth from what I've seen/read/heard.
If so, as a member I've lost a lot of confidence in the board. As I said above, I am happy for them to clarify & prove me wrong.
Maybe there’s no conspiracy to the whole CEO thing Lethlean may have been in the box seat but the interview process revealed a more suitable candidate..
Maybe there’s no conspiracy to the whole CEO thing Lethlean may have been in the box seat but the interview process revealed a more suitable candidate..
Makes far too much sense Eskie, blindingly obvious from where I’m sitting but some people can’t help themselves.
It’s actually piss funny how wrong so many people on this site and journalists got it
Maybe there’s no conspiracy to the whole CEO thing Lethlean may have been in the box seat but the interview process revealed a more suitable candidate..
Which part is blindingly obvious and what which facts have you in hand to state as such?
There's every chance that there has been some 'funny' business has gone down and it's remarkable that anyone can unequivocally state that this has not been the case. What facts are you armed with to make this claim? I'm interested.
Could be anything.Which part is blindingly obvious and what which facts have you in hand to state as such?
There's every chance that there has been some 'funny' business has gone down and it's remarkable that anyone can unequivocally state that this has not been the case. What facts are you armed with to make this claim? I'm interested.