Player Watch Henry Schade (Delisted 2017)

Remove this Banner Ad

Apex36 said:
Yeah it does.
Click to expand...

I just checked and even with all those factors, he's still listed as pick 67 in the 2011 National Draft so clearly it doesn't.
 
jackcass said:
I just checked and even with all those factors, he's still listed as pick 67 in the 2011 National Draft so clearly it doesn't.
Click to expand...
He could have been pick 167. Still not an accurate reflection of his value at the time he was drafted. Given your original post implied that his value had somehow increased since he was drafted, its highly relevant.

Can I suggest we stop this argument now? It's pointless, and I wasn't even replying to you with my original post anyway. All we're doing now is annoying each other and everyone else reading this.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Apex36 said:
He could have been pick 167. Still not an accurate reflection of his value at the time he was drafted. Given your original post implied that his value had somehow increased since he was drafted, its highly relevant.

Can I suggest we stop this argument now? It's pointless, and I wasn't even replying to you with my original post anyway. All we're doing now is annoying each other and everyone else reading this.
Click to expand...

That's not an argument!

My bad, wasn't aware that posters were precluded from commenting on posts if they weren't directly involved some how (which I was anyway because you extrapolated on a reply to my post).

Thanks for conceding you were wrong so graciously. It was obvious from the start that turning pick 67 (69 points) into picks 44 + 62 (362 points + 123 points = 489 points) reflects increased value while turning pick 24 (785 points) into a rookie draft pick (0 points) reflects the opposite.
 
jackcass said:
That's not an argument!

My bad, wasn't aware that posters were precluded from commenting on posts if they weren't directly involved some how (which I was anyway because you extrapolated on a reply to my post).

Thanks for conceding you were wrong so graciously. It was obvious from the start that turning pick 67 (69 points) into picks 44 + 62 (362 points + 123 points = 489 points) reflects increased value while turning pick 24 (785 points) into a rookie draft pick (0 points) reflects the opposite.
Click to expand...
Whatever Jackass.
 
jackcass said:
Be a real surprise if we see either in the seniors in 2017. Would mean either that they've put together some irresistible footy (which would be fantastic) or we've been decimated by injuries again.
Click to expand...
Rubbish. Only Lynden ******* Dunn is ahead of McLarty. He's a huge chance to play in 17.
 
Apex36 said:
Whatever Jackass.
Click to expand...

Magnanimous of you.

Oh, and misspelling my name actually says more about you than it does about me, puts all those "grow up" claims into context.
 
jackcass said:
Magnanimous of you.

Oh, and misspelling my name actually says more about you than it does about me, puts all those "grow up" claims into context.
Click to expand...
Or I could have just been on my phone and not noticed the autocorrect.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Mkcaptain said:
I agree with Thatsgold that he'll be our first rookie elevated for a long-term injury.

Cox will most likely be elevated in March as the 40th player. That leaves Thomas, McCarthy, Mackie, Lynch and Schade.
Thomas is coming off two years without football and is competing for a spot in our position with the most depth.
McCarthy and Lynch are project talls that will take a while to develop.
Mackie looks promising but is largely an unknown quality. He'll be starting from the same spot Manteit was. Hopefully Mackie will show more AFL weapons than what Manteit had though.
That leaves Schade. He has played at an AFL level in the past. He is only starting behind Reid, Keeffe, and Dunn. If he has a strong preseason and plays well in the VFL he'll be first called on as a replacement.
Click to expand...
Good logical presentation of likely scenario and situation.
:thumbsu:
 
rand corp said:
Handy depth player who fills an immediate need for a tall, last line defender after Frost and Brown departures. Not unlike Frost he has some good attributes but has been in the system for some time and yet failed to really make a senior spot his own. Will get his chance to turn that around.
Click to expand...
Better looking than Frost.
Catnip to the ladies I suspect.
 
THATSGOLD said:
I'll never forgive him. I'm more interested in seeing someone like Schade develop down back for us.
Click to expand...
I prefer the best player.
To err is human, to forgive divine.
:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Maggie5
List Mgmt. Teams Delistings and Retirements
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
pablo disco bar
pablo disco bar

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top