
- Apr 25, 2011
- 8,274
- 19,738
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
That's generally what delisted means.Confirmed that sharp wasn't offered a contract by GC
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
LIVE: Collingwood v Hawthorn - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Pies at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 12
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
LIVE: Collingwood v Hawthorn - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Pies at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
That's generally what delisted means.Confirmed that sharp wasn't offered a contract by GC
You'd think so wouldn't you, except Fantasia was offered a contract by Port and turned it down.That's generally what delisted means.
Dylan Roberton comes to mind...That's generally what delisted means.
The point being the Dees (and even us to a slightly lower extent) found a role that got a lot out of him despite the flaw. No reason we couldn't do same with NoD.Agreed, Langdon's kick was disgusting and the cause of consistent turnovers as all our players were running forward and offside. I was happy to see him go.
BUT
Melbourne have coached him perfectly. It's clear they've asked him to shorten his kicks to reduce risk and keep his skills within his comfort zone. Langdon's got a lot of good tools, but for whatever reason at Freo he was generally trying to kick too long, biting off too much. His pace ability to find sapce and break lines is exactly what you want from a winger which he gives to Melbourne, and now without the turnovers.
i'm not yet convinced NOD has the ability to find space consistently and also hit targets regularly with his average kick.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
But it's not just O'Driscoll's kicking which limits him. He's not as talented at finding space and running the repeat efforts required. I think he's generally a fair way behind where Langdon was. Dris needs to improve a fair few things not just his kicking before he's deserving of a spot.The point being the Dees (and even us to a slightly lower extent) found a role that got a lot out of him despite the flaw. No reason we couldn't do same with NoD.
Possibly, but all I said was the kicking won't stop him alone.But it's not just O'Driscoll's kicking which limits him. He's not as talented at finding space and running the repeat efforts required. I think he's generally a fair way behind where Langdon was. Dris needs to improve a fair few things not just his kicking before he's deserving of a spot.
I think it would. Unfortunately for him his kicking is that bad you cant just paper over it. He's not forcing out any players from other positions - he's not a forward or back, we dont need inside mids, we need skilled outside runners so that's where things get tough for him. I think he's great and want him to succeed but he's coming from a long way back with better choices in front of him at present. he'll need a fair bit to go right for him, and to improve his delivery for the coaches to select him i'd hope.Possibly, but all I said was the kicking won't stop him alone.
Noddy, I have beentold has worked really hard onwhat he has to do. He looks in very good nick. His season last year was unfortunate,, but he has learnt .Nathan O'Driscoll has to move substantially more human around the park than Ed Langdon, it's going to take longer for his body to be able to maintain that effort - it's why you rarely see a 2m tall player who can run midfield distances at reasonable pace - let alone at speed.
I have no idea how he good he ends up because he's looked everywhere from WAFL reserves player to B22 goal kicking AFL winger in his short time.I think it would. Unfortunately for him his kicking is that bad you cant just paper over it. He's not forcing out any players from other positions - he's not a forward or back, we dont need inside mids, we need skilled outside runners so that's where things get tough for him. I think he's great and want him to succeed but he's coming from a long way back with better choices in front of him at present. he'll need a fair bit to go right for him, and to improve his delivery for the coaches to select him i'd hope.
I'm not "writing him off". I'm just not convinced by him and think he's down the pecking order. I'd love him to succeed though.I have no idea how he good he ends up because he's looked everywhere from WAFL reserves player to B22 goal kicking AFL winger in his short time.
I do think you're taking the **** writing him off at this stage. Has many desirable attributes. I don't even think his kicking is that bad either. It's not good, but it's not career ending bad. At the very least he has penetration.
I'm not sure I agree with a lot of that, so let's just agree to disagree in general.I'm not "writing him off". I'm just not convinced by him and think he's down the pecking order. I'd love him to succeed though.
You summed him up yourself - he's everywhere from a WAFL reserves player to an AFL player, which doesn't bode well for anyone. Also, you're only as good as your last game and his last game(s) was very poor.
I'd love to be proven wrong but people keep talking about him with so much hope, whereas the evidence to date doesn't weigh in his favour, especially when we've just picked up Sharp who at surface value is ahead of Dris, and Chapman may take a spot as well if he can get fit.
We can agree to disagree on his kicking but it's a horrible action, very Brett Peake like.
But it's not just O'Driscoll's kicking which limits him. He's not as talented at finding space and running the repeat efforts required. I think he's generally a fair way behind where Langdon was. Dris needs to improve a fair few things not just his kicking before he's deserving of a spot.
That's great that he was good in this area as a junior, but within the first quarter of the WAFL grand final he struggled and was run down and caught with the ball. Maybe he just had a bad day but before the game he was talking very confident in his ability and fitness.I don't know about the repeat efforts statement. It was a strength of his as a junior, with his profile stating he is elite with what he does without the ball and highlighting his work rate. And he does pretty well in the time trials.
One example was at Marvel against the Bulldogs where he completely botched an effort near the defensive goal line and it led to a goal. But the point is he was there, a bit like how Acres made a few goal line stops during the finals. Not long after he was storming away through the centre and kicked an excellent long goal.
He also has that infectious enthusiasm and gets the crowd and teammates up and about with his behaviour. I wouldn't underestimate having these sorts of players in an introverted team.
I would also disagree he is behind where Langdon was. Langdon's first 3 years went at around 16-18 disposals average. O'Driscoll missed his 1st year, and over the next 2 he is averaging around the 16 disposal mark if you take out the games he was sub.
He obviously has deficiencies with his kicking consistency, but the rest of his game seems pretty solid to me for someone who has only played 22 games.
Noddy, I have beentold has worked really hard onwhat he has to do. He looks in very good nick. His season last year was unfortunate,, but he has learnt .
I am sure he will become a very much improved player and make the wing his own. A goal a game winger... good value.
I agree.I have no idea how he good he ends up because he's looked everywhere from WAFL reserves player to B22 goal kicking AFL winger in his short time.
I do think you're taking the **** writing him off at this stage. Has many desirable attributes. I don't even think his kicking is that bad either. It's not good, but it's not career ending bad. At the very least he has penetration.
You’re reading through your own view point without actually interpreting what I’m saying. You need to temper your emotional attachment to NOD.I agree.
Imagine if Gaff, Langdon, Cripps, Saad and Oliver were judged solely on their kicking. They're all terrible field kicks.
Toranto, Hewett, Stringer, Rowbottom, Viney, Worpel, Fyfe, Ross, Gresham, Dusty and Gawn are all players that went at less that 51%KE last year. Delist them as well?
I understand your point and don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he's Chris Judd or Gary Dhurrkay (one of the best field kicks i've seen).You’re reading through your own view point without actually interpreting what I’m saying. You need to temper your emotional attachment to NOD.
All those players you’ve listed have average kicks, I agree, but most are elite in other areas, and not just one area but multiple. If you’re a gun inside mid who has an elite mark, can break tackles, has elite running etc etc ala Fyfe you can gloss over a poor kick because he dominates in other areas.
O’Driscolls problem comes because he’s a poor kick and has no other feature in which he dominates and other players are now ahead of him in other features eg Sharp is also a better runner. And I never said delist him, I want him to succeed. I’m just saying he’s coming from a long way back before he’s B22. It’s highly unlikely he’s going to start on the wing round 1 and dominate like some are saying.
When i say he has no other feature, i'm talking about no other feature that separates him from his competition. He has features - but at this stage others in the team have the same if not better features, Sharp also has a big body but can run better. Johson has a big body and can also play inside. Aish has flexibility to play other positions. Ask yourself the question - who is he forcing out of the team for that wing position given his last run of form. Sharp is untried with us but will no doubt get first crack. Chapman, Johnson, Aish, Stanley and Sharp are all potential wingers along with others as well. it's competitive in there.I understand your point and don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he's Chris Judd or Gary Dhurrkay (one of the best field kicks i've seen).
I'm just trying to give a bit of perspective to see if the opinion I had, like others, that he is a woeful kick is true. Turns out - it's not.
You've posted again (I assume you read the stats?) that "he’s a poor kick and has no other feature".
I've posted his KE% that confirm his kicking is statistically better than others in his position. In fact, it's just 2% less than Nick Daicos, who is widely considered one of the best in the league. It's up to you if you want to take that on board or ignore it.
I don't agree he has no other features. I think he has an excellent work-rate, good defensively (terrific tackling technique), holds his width really well, good at the contest, strong (big body), decent above his head and has an awesome attitude, loves the club and you can see he lifts the team when he pops a goal.
If he gets consistent games, he'll improve. Time at the crease if the greatest teacher.
I understand your point and don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he's Chris Judd or Gary Dhurrkay (one of the best field kicks i've seen).
I'm just trying to give a bit of perspective to see if the opinion I had, like others, that he is a woeful kick is true. Turns out - it's not.
You've posted again (I assume you read the stats?) that "he’s a poor kick and has no other feature".
I've posted his KE% that confirm his kicking is statistically better than others in his position. In fact, it's just 2% less than Nick Daicos, who is widely considered one of the best in the league. It's up to you if you want to take that on board or ignore it.
I don't agree he has no other features. I think he has an excellent work-rate, good defensively (terrific tackling technique), holds his width really well, good at the contest, strong (big body), decent above his head and has an awesome attitude, loves the club and you can see he lifts the team when he pops a goal.
If he gets consistent games, he'll improve. Time at the crease if the greatest teacher.