Treloar?
I saw Saunders hit at a target in that footage. He is already better than Treloar based on that.Better kicking action though.
Sounds like he has Danger covered tooI saw Saunders hit at a target in that footage. He is already better than Treloar based on that.
The slow/precise way requires a lot of highly skilled players with amazing foot skills. We no longer have access to those cattle so the game plan has to change. GWS could maybe do it if they had the brains in the coaching box.I sense a trend in the players we have drafted this year that Clarko may be moving away from the very controlled, slow tempo style of football we have played the last 3 years to a more fast paced run and carry Richmond style where we smash it forward and keep it locked in our forward 50 with elite defensive pressure.
I may be reading too much into this but we seemed to have placed a emphasis on speed in most of our picks.
Even the way we seem to have really concentrated on stacking our backline with great contested marks (DGB) is to a certain extent based on Richmond gameplan.
I think it is smart because look at last year's GF. Geelong who are the experts at that slow, controlled methodical style of football couldn't maintain it over 4 quarters and were eventually (inevitably?) blown away.
Bit of a shorter Mitch RobinsonRuns like the wind blows.
If he is half the mongrel Robinson is he will be more than handy!Bit of a shorter Mitch Robinsonabout him in the way he moves..PLAYERCARDSTART5Mitch Robinson
- Age
- 31
- Ht
- 184cm
- Wt
- 90kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 19.9
- 5star
- K
- 11.2
- 4star
- HB
- 8.7
- 5star
- M
- 4.1
- 4star
- T
- 4.7
- 5star
- CL
- 3.2
- 5star
- D
- 15.8
- 4star
- K
- 11.3
- 4star
- HB
- 4.5
- 3star
- M
- 3.9
- 4star
- T
- 1.9
- 3star
- CL
- 1.8
- 4star
- D
- 13.2
- 4star
- K
- 8.0
- 3star
- HB
- 5.2
- 4star
- M
- 4.0
- 4star
- T
- 3.6
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
speed speed speedRuns like the wind blows.
This is great data, thanks for sharing. I know he's from a different era but Shane Crawford was 1.74 so isn't even on the graph. I absolutely believe that he would have been a star in any era. Not comparing Jack to Shane, just saying that great players are missed with a focus on stats. Rookie is perfect way to find out how Jack develops.A couple of cms seems to make a big difference to the likelihood of being an elite clearance mid. it is 180cm+ or almost not at all.
View attachment 1026853
Yeah taking someone like this in the rookie draft is a long shot at getting someone like Neale with far less of exposed form to support the decision. He may turn into a HFF and sit a little outside the contest. He has the speed for it.This is great data, thanks for sharing. I know he's from a different era but Shane Crawford was 1.74 so isn't even on the graph. I absolutely believe that he would have been a star in any era. Not comparing Jack to Shane, just saying that great players are missed with a focus on stats. Rookie is perfect way to find out how Jack develops.
I saw a video of him winning an 800m race in SA. No idea now where I saw it so I can’t provide a link. I don’t think endurance will be an issue though.I have heard that he was a middle distance runner 800 - 1500m so already has the endurance. Will be good to go at VFL / AFL level if deemed worthy
I saw a video of him winning an 800m race in SA. No idea now where I saw it so I can’t provide a link. I don’t think endurance will be an issue though.
Yep. That is it. Thanks SYL. Just noted it is 400m not 800m
Ummm. Sanders?The Colonel
Silent UUmmm. Sanders?
I know. But it's close enough that every time I see the name I can't help but think it lolUmmm. Sanders?
Personal opinion but he would already be a better option then Scully playing the loose release off the half back wing position. Depth of kicking, line breaking and fitness he offers a lot of point of differences compared to someCue the "run fast and force the ball forward at all costs" game plan !