Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a little bit strange Rnd 1 we played him thru the midfield and he was good, Rnd two we played him thru the forward flank. Which he doesn't like or play well.My posts re Tom were more referring to his disposal by foot going inside our attacking 50 (seperate to the other clangers by the team on the day) He had a few opportunities to hurt the Tigers and missed his targets, instead turning it over. Had time and space as well.
Really hope he can turn it around on Monday!
It's that simple?It's a little bit strange Rnd 1 we played him thru the midfield and he was good, Rnd two we played him thru the forward flank. Which he doesn't like or play well.
We did it simply because Clarko is committed to getting Burgs (who I absolutely love) to 400 games this year. He suffered the hit for Burgs being on Dusty. (Interestingly even though it suprised Hardwick apparently both coaches overall gave Dusty BOG between them) Would we have been better off playing a younger player who will be around a little longer on Dusty in the middle where he plays his best footy and Burgs as a HFF or not?
That is perhaps the real question. Wouldn't be surprised to see Burgs the sub this week, last week would have taken a toll on his body.
3 games in to his time with us. Not sure he should be seen as the finished product just yet.
Let’s see how he’s tracking in a month.
Can see why the Pies weren't overly fussed with losing him, isn't great by foot nor very clean with his pick ups etc, lucky we paid little but I feel at some point we'll need an upgrade if we really want to climb the ladder.
21 touches at 85% yesterday. Was good I thought. Only real weakness I saw was wanting to get onto his left foot so badly he ran himself into trouble.
He is decent overhead too. Pretty handy for us so far. I think as we all grow into the game plan he will look better.
Exactly give him a year and he will be that much betterLost count of how many players we've brought in over the years who took up to a year to come good in our system.
Lost count of how many players we've brought in over the years who took up to a year to come good in our system.
Gunston took half a season to get going at the clubOnly Gunston and Lake seemed to dominate straight away, whilst others took a year to adjust.
Only Gunston and Lake seemed to dominate straight away, whilst others took a year to adjust.
Gunners and Lake took a little while, Lake is the first to admit he'd been very hot and cold all season but it all clicked in the GF.
Tom Mitchell came in and played very well straight away but didn't quite gel with his teammates as well as he could.
This. Frawley struggled first year as well yet a few are getting impatient with Hartigan. It takes time to adjust to a new club and teammates strengths and weaknesses. It is what it is.Lost count of how many players we've brought in over the years who took up to a year to come good in our system.