Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 97,426
- 235,945
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #2,526
This thread is full of keyboard heroes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This thread is full of keyboard heroes.
That the type of impression you want to give to the rest of the league - play sh*t for a year & we'll delist you?Is this muppet still on our list, even if we don't find a suitor to orchestrate a trade,
delist him now where going to do it at the end of next season anyway. Save time and develop a rookie in his spot. Cut our losses pay him out.
That the type of impression you want to give to the rest of the league - play sh*t for a year & we'll delist you?
What affect do you think that might have on our standing as a 'Destination Club'? Guys with any doubt or coming back from injury or moving interstate would lose interest. And, it would be a sh*t thing to do anyway.
Good plan though
That the type of impression you want to give to the rest of the league - play sh*t for a year & we'll delist you?
What affect do you think that might have on our standing as a 'Destination Club'? Guys with any doubt or coming back from injury or moving interstate would lose interest. And, it would be a sh*t thing to do anyway.
Good plan though
Thats the exact impression i want to give to the league.. in tyrone specific case he was struggling to get a game at richmond his afl career was over no team wanted him, hawthorn showed him hope, he of field and on field has been disgusting a new club you should have your head down and bum up attitude be working your backside off on and off the ground!!
we have stuck fat with langford and schoenmakers who have produced meidocre performances for years,
we stuck buy alex woodward for years and we backed our selfs to recruit and turn burgoyne and jager career threating injurys around.
so in short yes if u don't work your backside of at hawthorn on and off the field when you can't play games you will be shown the door.
we will always be a destination club with continued success and faith in players like burgoyne and jage. Jager is a classic example who does everything right off the field while he continues to find form.
How do you know what he is doing on the training pitch and around the club in regards to working hard? Sure his performances in the seniors weren't stellar - that doesn't mean he hasn't been trying in some capacity.
Just because of one sensationalist news item (which was more Jake King's wrongdoing - and something of which Ty has faced no charged and zero follow-up stories about) you think he's done for?
I guess this is why juries are made up of 12 people, not just one.
Regardless, MrZohs' suggestion was that we delist & pay him out.There are a lot of rumours going around that the club has not been happy with his onfield or off field behaviour. Getting suspended twice at BHH in the last few weeks am sure did not help.
I'm willing to be the rumours are true... and not just a journo making stuff up.
We should hire Jake King and attempt to get our money back.
The same Jake King who's now locked up for trying to get someone else's money back?
You must be Joe King!
I think it's too early to tell the guy to pack his bags.
He had a disaster year - but we gave him a contract of 2 or 3 years and we have to stick by that.
I don't think it'll work out. I was disappointed when we picked him up - but we gotta give it a crack. I can't think of any other examples of players shifting clubs, having a bad year and then coming back as strong role players but maybe it could happen.
If we can get Vickery or Ceglar to actually perform as a forward/ruck (that is, kick 20-30 goals for the season and relieve in the ruck when required) then Roughy can become the roving player that suits him best.
s**t, who knows, with Brichall and Stratton back maybe Gunston will even be a forward line player. We could look really different next year. It's another chance for Vickery to put his hand up for a role.
The exit interview would have been pretty blunt. Ty is probably used to that because Dimma is a very direct coach as well, but by now, Vickery would have learned that he needed more than a change of scenery to get to his best. Now he's got an off season to give it a crack.
Regardless, MrZohs' suggestion was that we delist & pay him out.
Not only is that ridiculous from an investment & resilience perspective, it somewhat ironically undoes all the hard work we've done with other players, which Zohs points out, yet wants us (in this case) to turn our back & walk away from.
Emotion aside: this is a 7yr AFL (more?), 200cm Forward/Ruck that will cost us $500k in 2018, regardless where he's playing. Given that we're paying for him, we may as well use him to the best of our wants/needs & I'm sure that doesn't involve paying him to sit at home for 12 months...
I contemplated the same thing when I read this post below.All depends how you look at it. If you hire someone for a job and see they are not the right fit for your work place they bring a negativity to the work place. Do u keep them only because you hired them for 3 years. Or do u remove the stain bring in a fresh face and attitude, I personally remove the stain . I find it ludacris that you would keep a bad worker purely because you payed them for a 3yr contract.
Is this muppet still on our list, even if we don't find a suitor to orchestrate a trade,
delist him now where going to do it at the end of next season anyway. Save time and develop a rookie in his spot. Cut our losses pay him out.
All depends how you look at it.I contemplated the same thing when I read this post below.
So you'd risk the label as a destination club because yoou don't like one player's work ethic? Superb decision, so some future super star has a choice between us and some loser club, and he thinks, now there's a club that treats their sincoming personnel with respect. I'm choosing them, and they go to the loser club because we threw some stuggling player out with the trash five years earlier.All depends how you look at it. If you hire someone for a job and see they are not the right fit for your work place they bring a negativity to the work place. Do u keep them only because you hired them for 3 years. Or do u remove the stain bring in a fresh face and attitude, I personally remove the stain . I find it ludacris that you would keep a bad worker purely because you payed them for a 3yr contract.
So you'd risk the label as a destination club because yoou don't like one player's work ethic? Superb decision, so some future super star has a choice between us and some loser club, and he thinks, now there's a club that treats their sincoming personnel with respect. I'm choosing them, and they go to the loser club because we threw some stuggling player out with the trash five years earlier.
He's just a scum wannabe biker. Bikers are just drug pushers. Drugs kill kids.Charged - not convicted.
How are u risking the label of a destination club ? Any player even considering us will see he is not meeting the clubs standards. It will have 0 impact on there decision to join our great club..they will look at the success of gibbo,hale,lake etc and the team success over some guy with no ticker. You are simply delaying the inevitable decision which will come at the end of next season.So you'd risk the label as a destination club because yoou don't like one player's work ethic? Superb decision, so some future super star has a choice between us and some loser club, and he thinks, now there's a club that treats their sincoming personnel with respect. I'm choosing them, and they go to the loser club because we threw some stuggling player out with the trash five years earlier.