List Mgmt. Welcome: Tyson Stengle, new Crow!

[hey shorty]

So you think he is gonna play 385 AFL games then....

TBH I dont expect him to continue to be as durable, but 350 is not out of the question.

 

[tinman]

Why didn't we use our pick 72 to get him ?
Instead we do a pick swap with GCS for 68

We need to keep 72 in case we can get Coniglio or Taranto to agree to be traded to the Crows this period.

 

[Thetrader15]

We need to keep 72 in case we can get Coniglio or Taranto to agree to be traded to the Crows this period.

Now that we have the MM warchest for GWS's next salary dump you might be right

 

[the universal]

We really need a downvote option in bigfooty.

Wondering if we can also trade posters to other clubs?

 

[MRB37]

 

[jo172]

what you mean. im all for this trade. its a hawthornesque, premiership window type trade.

gullible much?

Stupid JR, should have traded 68 for Fyfe.

This is some serious nuff

 

[Scorpus]

Those guys think Stengle is worth more using their points system than McGovern

 

[GreyCrow]

At pick 68 if he plays 20+ games thats a win

 

[Stiffy_18]

At pick 68 if he plays 20+ games thats a win

Stiffy was pick 67 and played over 200 games

 

[ad victoriam]

At this time I not too fussed if he plays a game if he puts pressure on the player in front he worth the cost.
but I believe he will play a few, maybe not in 2019, but 2020 plus will be interesting

 

[Mike Smyth]

So you think he is gonna play 385 AFL games then....

Only 385. I reckon he will crack the 500.

you need to dumb it down abit.

 

[Bicks]

 

[Bojangles17]

I havent seen him so I dont know. But Tambling didnt mind dodging and weaving but did everything else poorly. Im just going by what a Richmond supporter said.

Nothing like tambking who actually was quick , just not with ball in hand , Tyson is a natural footballer moves well ,and handles the footy clean reminds me a lot of Matty stokes played a lot of footy for cats. Wouldn’t surpise me at all to see him play a bit of footy

 

[Mike Smyth]

Good luck to the kid. I don't have a problem with the trade but I do have a problem with us, for two years in a row, trading out more than we are trading in. Aren't we supposed to be in a premiership window?

 

[Daka]

He is not super quick but he is not slow either he is elusive and can break tackles don't buy into that he is not quick enough for the game, it's probably more endurance side of things that I'd be more worried about. you haven't given much up for him i see him being a good pick up for you guys he will def play AFL next year with you guys how much i don't know.

 

[jackster83]

Happy with this trade. Nice to bring another SA lad home too.

 

[WaynesWorld19]

Good luck to the kid. I don't have a problem with the trade but I do have a problem with us, for two years in a row, trading out more than we are trading in. Aren't we supposed to be in a premiership window?

How so ? ...McGovern out & Stengle and McAdam in ......by my calculations, we're in the positive

 

[kulak]

so Reid says it adds some speed, but Richmond supporters say he is slow?

The average speed of both lists increased.

 

[kulak]

He will still have a good 7 years here

Agreed. He is only 27 after all so a good 9 years is likely.

 

[sregit]

Are we really going to question this acquisition?! We picked up a 19 year old kid with some talent for pick 68. I think it’s well worth a shot. Fills the need, is young enough and it’s the type of player profile that we have had success with in the past. I think the kid will surprise quite a few in time.

Stengel is 19 and Richmond offered him a 2 year extension. He is well and truly worth the risk. I think he'll be a player.
But hope not. Don't want you guys to improve.

 

[Sanders]

Would he be quicker without the belly?

 

[FR0GGY]

How so ? ...McGovern out & Stengle and McAdam in ......by my calculations, we're in the positive

He means a best 22 player out and not one in.

 

[WaynesWorld19]

He means a best 22 player out and not one in.

Think you'll find, both these players were traded for, not to play SANFL ......trade for need, traded for speed & pressure .....big tick

 

[FR0GGY]

Think you'll find, both these players were traded for, not to play SANFL ......trade for need, traded for speed & pressure .....big tick

You’d hope most players we trade for are to play AFL but at this stage I can’t see them making the 22 first up, would much rather gallucci and Betts.

 

[hey shorty]

You’d hope most players we trade for are to play AFL but at this stage I can’t see them making the 22 first up, would much rather gallucci and Betts.

McAdam will.