Wells Recruiting record

Remove this Banner Ad

I am interested in your opinion. Do you think there is no need for this thread?
Pretty much could say the same about any aspect of AFL, particularly our CS thread. There are so many other variables that come into play.
All grist for the opinion mill, Vdubs. Merely a viewpoint. I do think it's easier to assess the impact of a coach - in isolation - than a recruiter though.

Play on.
 
Hes good at finding the hidden gem but his ability to recruit in the first and second round leaves a bit to be desired, tend to think he takes too many risks with those picks, so many times we dart to a left field option instead of just drafting the best players available at the selection.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Corey Enright.
he is in that 07, 09, 11 group, but not out of left field necessarily.
But no doubting he's an awesome pickup, along with Joel Corey, Chappy, SJ etc.
I was more thinking of players that were a bIt of a gamble but turned out to be GOLD.
 
he is in that 07, 09, 11 group, but not out of left field necessarily.
But no doubting he's an awesome pickup, along with Joel Corey, Chappy, SJ etc.
I was more thinking of players that were a bIt of a gamble but turned out to be GOLD.

I genuinely couldn’t care less about it being out of left field, or “Wells special” for that matter. Just pick the best footballers.

Enright is yet another one that shows high draft picks aren’t the be all and end all.
 
I genuinely couldn’t care less about it being out of left field, or “Wells special” for that matter. Just pick the best footballers.

Enright is yet another one that shows high draft picks aren’t the be all and end all.
Good for you. But some people have different ways of looking at things.
Clearly, ALL our immortals are super footballers, but when Mackie was selected, you could hear and see the reaction. "Who is this kid?" And Taylor, same deal.Pods...
All these guys have turned out champions, but at the start, there were lots of questions and murmurings.
 
What are his best gets?
From memory, my favourites were
All the players that played in 07, 09, 11 GF''s.
Not bad.
Harry, Mackie and Pods are classic Wells picks.

Do you get points for late picks like Stokes or bargain under appreciated like Pods .... but extra points for me is when you really need to a pick to work.

Think back.. we had found a tennis player, placed him in our VFL , developed him, put time in , placed him round our much vaunted early selections and father sons.. and he elevated to the level of AA ..then on the cusp of our finals oour AA KPD ..is injured ..and never plays again.

All that work and the time.. all the other selections.. are they all to be flushed?

The teams was so good in 07 it won the flag without the AA KPD but that was not sustainable.. we needed a fix and we needed one quickly. There was is no FA, and we only have a late R1 ... so over to you MrWells

With P17 Geelong selects Harry Taylor.


and by the end of his days , at the end of 2020... he had played more afl games than anyone from that draft including Cotchin and Dangerfield
 
Good for you. But some people have different ways of looking at things.
Clearly, ALL our immortals are super footballers, but when Mackie was selected, you could hear and see the reaction. "Who is this kid?" And Taylor, same deal.Pods...
All these guys have turned out champions, but at the start, there were lots of questions and murmurings.
Mackie and Taylor were clearly rated a lot higher than Enright come draft time just going off where they were actually picked. Enright at 47 was phenomenal. Who knows, if Wells didnt call his name maybe he goes undrafted at the time.
 
Mackie and Taylor were clearly rated a lot higher than Enright come draft time just going off where they were actually picked. Enright at 47 was phenomenal. Who knows, if Wells didnt call his name maybe he goes undrafted at the time.
Maybe.
There was a draft doco around that time following three recruits ... and in one bit of vision Enrights name was on the whiteboard of one team... so he ws not completely unknown... but if every draft has a 1000 names ..bound to be the odd player or two thats slips thru and never gets his shot.. so maybe
 
Mackie and Taylor were clearly rated a lot higher than Enright come draft time just going off where they were actually picked. Enright at 47 was phenomenal. Who knows, if Wells didnt call his name maybe he goes undrafted at the time.

You do wonder what attributes they look for in 18-year-olds. It would be interesting to see how football ability - which is pretty difficult to measure - rates compared to how fast you run and how high you jump.
 
Good for you. But some people have different ways of looking at things.
Clearly, ALL our immortals are super footballers, but when Mackie was selected, you could hear and see the reaction. "Who is this kid?" And Taylor, same deal.Pods...
All these guys have turned out champions, but at the start, there were lots of questions and murmurings.

True. Most important thing to me when drafting young players:

1. Football ability
2. Football ability
3. Football ability
4. .....................
5. Everything else
 
Mackie and Taylor were clearly rated a lot higher than Enright come draft time just going off where they were actually picked. Enright at 47 was phenomenal. Who knows, if Wells didnt call his name maybe he goes undrafted at the time.
We selected Mackie very early, but he wasn't on the radar anywhere near that level.
And it is all retrospective.
Very easy to say the most important thing in drafting is FOOTBALL ABILITY, but all these kids have ability.
It is only after they are in a great team and develop that we can appreciate how good they are. Early days for both Coreys were not auspicious.
 
We selected Mackie very early, but he wasn't on the radar anywhere near that level.
And it is all retrospective.
Very easy to say the most important thing in drafting is FOOTBALL ABILITY, but all these kids have ability.
It is only after they are in a great team and develop that we can appreciate how good they are. Early days for both Coreys were not auspicious.

Difference was then we persisted with them.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

We selected Mackie very early, but he wasn't on the radar anywhere near that level.
And it is all retrospective.
Very easy to say the most important thing in drafting is FOOTBALL ABILITY, but all these kids have ability.
It is only after they are in a great team and develop that we can appreciate how good they are. Early days for both Coreys were not auspicious.
Who’s ‘radar’ are you referring to? Obviously not the Wells one.
 
Who’s ‘radar’ are you referring to? Obviously not the Wells one.
This article suggests he was fairly prominent in the lead up to the draft, but he didn't play for SA in the U18s in that year, didn't make the national draft camp and seems to have played most of the year with his school side rather than Glenelg (even then I think he only played reserves). Pretty unusual to have that pedigree and get taken at 7: https://www.afl.com.au/news/88030/mackie-the-cats-best-kept-secret
 
When you have later picks there is more freedom to gamble. If Geelong had a top 5 pick they would have the same pressure to take a conservative "top rated kid" pick as the rest of the bottom clubs do. The later picks are more speculative, where recruiters get to see what they want to see. I would judge recruiting teams more based on their round 3+/rookie picks more than their first 2 round picks. I would judge development teams more on round 1/2 picks.
 
2010​
pick 57Western BulldogsNathan Djerrkurawin
pick 36CarltonJeremy Laidlerfail
pick 53pick 41
pick 15Gold Coastmid-first round compensation pickneutral
2011​
pick 32Gold Coastpick 26neutral
pick 34
2012​
Hamish McIntoshNorth Melbournepick 38FAIL
Josh CaddyGold Coastfirst-round compensation pickneutral
pick 57
2013​
pick 64AdelaideJames Podsiadlyneutral
pick 75Greater Western SydneyJosh Huntneutral
pick 84EssendonPaul Chapmanneutral
pick 41Brisbane LionsTrent Westloss
2014​
pick 21Brisbane LionsAllen Christensenloss
Mitch ClarkMelbourneN/AMulti-club tradeloss
N/ACollingwoodTravis Varcoe
Rhys StanleySt Kildapick 21win
pick 60
pick 10Adelaidepick 14loss
pick 47pick 35
2015​
Patrick DangerfieldAdelaideDean Gorefail (no other RFA trades)
pick 50pick 9
pick 28
Lachie HendersonCarlton2016 first round pick (Geelong)fail
2016 third round pick (Brisbane Lions)Brisbane LionsJarrad Jansenfail
Josh Walker
Zac SmithGold Coastpick 49fail
pick 53
2016 fifth round pick (Greater Western Sydney)Greater Western SydneySteve Johnsonfail
2016​
pick 63FremantleShane Kerstenwin
Zach TuohyCarltonBillie Smedtswin
2017 second round pick (Carlton)pick 63
2017 first round pick (Geelong)
pick 24RichmondJosh CaddyFAIL
pick 64pick 56
pick 72West CoastNathan VardyFAIL
Aaron BlackNorth Melbournepick 92neutral
2017​
2018 third round pick (Richmond)Richmondpick 53neutral
pick 58CarltonDarcy Langwin
2018 fourth round pick (Carlton)2018 fourth round pick (Geelong)
Gary AblettGold Coastpick 19win
pick 242018 second round pick (Geelong)
2018 fourth round pick (Gold Coast)
2018​
pick 43Brisbane LionsLincoln McCarthyfail
pick 62pick 55
pick 59
Nathan KreugerCarltonpick 43Pre-draft selectionneutral
Gary RohanSydneypick 62win
pick 59Gold CoastGeorge Horlin-Smithneutral
pick 70SydneyJackson Thurlowfail
pick 51Collingwoodpick 59neutral
pick 60
pick 68Richmond2019 fourth round pick (Geelong)Live trade during draftneutral
2019​
pick 14West CoastTim KellyMulti-club trade
pick 242020 third round pick (Geelong)win
2020 first round pick (West Coast)
pick 37Essendonpick 57
pick 58Gold CoastZac Smithwin
Jack StevenSt Kildapick 58neutral
Josh JenkinsAdelaidepick 37neutral
2020 third round pick (Gold Coast)
pick 64Gold Coastpick 27Live trade during draft
2020 first round priority pick (Gold Coast)win
pick 50Essendonpick 63Live trade during draft
2020 third round pick (Gold Coast)neutral
2020 fourth round pick (Geelong)
Dangerfield trade a loss?
How do you have Josh caddy traded out for pick 24 in all caps then have the player we selected at the pick a a win?
Clark neutral?

Listing every pick and judging it implies you expect every pick to be a winner. Very few are at any club
 
Name another club that traded for a RFA -
But why is that a fail? Cats wanted to get the deal done quickly and it was. We got our man and he has delivered in spades. We lost a bit player. This cannot be construed as anything other than a win. Just because no club had traded for a RFA before this deal doesn't diminish the deal in any way
 
But why is that a fail? Cats wanted to get the deal done quickly and it was. We got our man and he has delivered in spades. We lost a bit player. This cannot be construed as anything other than a win. Just because no club had traded for a RFA before this deal doesn't diminish the deal in any way

It was definitively not a fail. No other club has traded in a Brownlow Medallist, three-time B&F winner, and five-time consecutive All Australian before, either. And it's hard to imagine another one ever getting a deal done which was manifestly so worthwhile in improving their team, for such a middling 'cost' at the trade table.

When you're considering Danger's acquisition a 'fail', you really have completely lost touch with any semblance of objective analysis. His joining the Cats would be worth at least double what we 'paid' for him, if not more.
 
Name another club that traded for a RFA -
Dont let your anger lead you to being an abusive twad

People are showing how much latitude afforded to Wells, when none is afforded to Scott
How exactly would you have gone about landing Jez? Us being the only one trading for RFAs is more a reflection of the quality of players putting their hands up to come here.

Your attributing control of another side matching a bid to Wells when it's not his decision. Nonsense argument
 
Well there goes that argument then. One high draft pick failed.

Dustin Martin had football ability too. Stupid Richmond.

There are a heap of failed high draft picks who had “football ability”

Competitiveness, dedication and luck all required equally with “football ability” to he a success..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
True. Most important thing to me when drafting young players:

1. Football ability
2. Football ability
3. Football ability
4. .....................
5. Everything else

Thats fair enough ... Id say its a risk to not include other factors in the decision. Its the Syd Stack type question. On Football ability he would have been drafted.

Football ability is obvious a high factor. For me defining football talents , the natural engrained talent that will allow a player to cope with the top level.. is part of football ability.

Wells obviously rates combine testing every year we seem to draft someone who has stood at at one of the tests.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top