- Joined
- Aug 9, 2006
- Posts
- 3,541
- Reaction score
- 6,748
- Location
- Level 2 Bar, Coventry End
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Packers, Detroit Tigers
I know this is a little controversial, but I thought GT's comments before last week's game were a bit odd. Here it is from the Saints website:
"Would you sacrifice a top-four position to be right on top of your game?" he pondered aloud.
"I think most teams would, but if you're not right on top of your game and you're in the top four you've got an extra life - I suppose they cancel each other out.
"What I'd like to do is probably not be in super form, have a top-four position and then get the players in good form - that'd be the right way to be."
And then we went out and got pantsed by Freo. I couldn't help but think that GT had decided two out of the last 3 would be good enough and that if we won against Freo, that would be a bonus.
Did anyone else think those comments were odd?
"Would you sacrifice a top-four position to be right on top of your game?" he pondered aloud.
"I think most teams would, but if you're not right on top of your game and you're in the top four you've got an extra life - I suppose they cancel each other out.
"What I'd like to do is probably not be in super form, have a top-four position and then get the players in good form - that'd be the right way to be."
And then we went out and got pantsed by Freo. I couldn't help but think that GT had decided two out of the last 3 would be good enough and that if we won against Freo, that would be a bonus.
Did anyone else think those comments were odd?




Lucky we did! 

