- Aug 27, 2015
- 932
- 650
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
So is this logo confirmed. And how about the jumpers?
Just curious.
Just curious.
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So is this logo confirmed. And how about the jumpers?
Just curious.
The more I see the new logo the more I'm in disbelief over how long any version of the above was retained for as long as it was. Garbage. New logo is the best we've had since the OG and hopefully it isn't touched again for a very very very long time.View attachment 447626
I actually like the old logo more than the new one. Maybe something like this could've been an improvement whilst still keeping the design of the old.
I'm shocked that the club never used this.View attachment 447626
I actually like the old logo more than the new one. Maybe something like this could've been an improvement whilst still keeping the design of the old.
Our logos have dated pretty well. I don't expect the new one to be an exception.The more I see the new logo the more I'm in disbelief over how long any version of the above was retained for as long as it was. Garbage. New logo is the best we've had since the OG and hopefully it isn't touched again for a very very very long time.
(just my opinion though).
The new one to me just isn't as threatening or intimidating as the old ones. The old logo and the one before that sends the message that WC was a team to be feared. The new one just looks like "eh we're the eagles, but we wont hurt you" They just got rid of what made their team unique in the logo department, now it just looks like a lousy clone of Hawthorn's logo.The more I see the new logo the more I'm in disbelief over how long any version of the above was retained for as long as it was. Garbage. New logo is the best we've had since the OG and hopefully it isn't touched again for a very very very long time.
(just my opinion though).
I'm shocked why they ever went down the 'ochre' pathway with their logo (sorry FT)I'm shocked that the club never used this.
Barring the GOAT design, the orange looked stupid, particularly on the wings.I'm shocked why they ever went down the 'ochre' pathway with their logo (sorry FT)
Anyone who's intimidated by a logo shouldn't be on a footy field.The new one to me just isn't as threatening or intimidating as the old ones. The old logo and the one before that sends the message that WC was a team to be feared. The new one just looks like "eh we're the eagles, but we wont hurt you" They just got rid of what made their team unique in the logo department, now it just looks like a lousy clone of Hawthorn's logo.
That's why they're on BigFootyAnyone who's intimidated by a logo shouldn't be on a footy field.
I agree on all counts other than inversing the logo on the peril. I understand why people want it, but mock-ups have shown that it just doesn't look too good, as the blue parts on the actual logo are shadows, meaning it simply doesn't look quite right when inversed.So after (nearly) a whole season to witness the rebrand/new logo, what are everyone's thoughts on its success or otherwise?
For mine it has been an outstanding success. Original colours, original guernsey design (essentially) and a quality new logo that melds nicely into both the guernsey and the branding. The only room for improvement would be making the logo a straight inverse on the peril. It currently just looks like an outline (although I know what they are trying to achieve with the logo being gold on everything, it just doesn't work on the clash).
Overall thoughts/comments?
I agree that it doesn't look right, and for branding purposes (merch, etc.) you wouldn't use it. But on the guernsey I don't think it matters so much.I agree on all counts other than inversing the logo on the peril. I understand why people want it, but mock-ups have shown that it just doesn't look too good, as the blue parts on the actual logo are shadows, meaning it simply doesn't look quite right when inversed.
I agree that it doesn't look right, and for branding purposes (merch, etc.) you wouldn't use it. But on the guernsey I don't think it matters so much.
Good point about the logo. Both sponsor's logos intruding onto the wings sh*ts me no end. I look forward to seeing what 2019 brings in that regard.It took me while to get on board, but I like it. Works well on the off field merch, and great on the jumpers. No real issue with the clash, only comes out a few times a season so can live with it the way it is.
My issue is the HJs logo on the back of the away guernsey. It just doesn’t work, it cuts off the wing tips and looks weird. Should’ve just been the hungry jacks wording like on the older jumpers and put it in a box.
Interesting to see how it goes with a new sponsor next year.