- Banned
- #26
Her journalsm is very poor - really it is. I normally turn the page rather than read her boring puke and dribble. Seriously, the talent pool must be small if she is the AGE's big wig football writer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Caro's credibility is far far greater than Worsfolds and Goodings at this point in time.
Drug problem???
What drug problem??
Caro's credibility is far far greater than Worsfolds and Goodings at this point in time.
Drug problem???
What drug problem??
Why is it everytime Caro is mentioned in negative terms, someone has to mention that 'its because she's a women'.
When people denigrate hutchinson, does anybody say its because he is a man.
The Age has given up any semblence of an unbiased coverage, but its a Melbourne paper so fair enough.
These are the same people who give Robert Walls awards for expert commentary, of course.Ask other footy journalists what they think and they will tell you that she is among the most highly respected reporters - it depends on your opinion of footy journos.
in part, i don't respect her as a journo because she's a woman. well, not because she's a woman, but because of the qualities that come with her being a woman.
hutchy (who i also don't have a lot of time for) summed it up last week on footy classified when he asked her "why do you have to get so personal all the time."
when i want soap opera for men, i watch wrestling. i hate the way that caro personalises everything and makes it a soap drama. i don't think men necessarily care about her womens magazine style of reporting that she so often uses.
my loathing of her has certainly increased with her constant bashing of the eagles. most journos have given up on bashing selwood because the tribunal accepted his version of events. for her to continue saying and acting as though he's lying is tantamount to slander.
if she burned in the fiery pits of hell, i would be a happy man.
errrrrrrrrr hello, thats her role as a journo, it is not to analyse the game, it is to report on the behind the scenes stuff.
in part, i don't respect her as a journo because she's a woman. well, not because she's a woman, but because of the qualities that come with her being a woman.
They remove their accreditation, stopping them attending games, press conferences etc
Won't hapen, but that's how they'd do it
well after the moaning by weagle supporters about her I decided to read her article (absolutely hate the Ages new online footy layout so dont tend to go there anymore), I'd have to say it comes across as calm & reasonable to me. Cant see any bias there at all as lets face it everything she says of WC is true............and has been said by many here for quite some time now.
the thing is here - the people that bag Caro's looks are waking up next to one of the following ;
1 no one as they are 14
2 a fatter, uglier wife/girlfriend
3 no one because they are far uglier and fatter than Caro could ever be.....
tipping its more often than not number 3 - so if you are going to pot Caro's looks at least be man enough to post a picture of yourself first !!!!!
in part, i don't respect her as a journo because she's a woman. well, not because she's a woman, but because of the qualities that come with her being a woman.
hutchy (who i also don't have a lot of time for) summed it up last week on footy classified when he asked her "why do you have to get so personal all the time."
when i want soap opera for men, i watch wrestling. i hate the way that caro personalises everything and makes it a soap drama. i don't think men necessarily care about her womens magazine style of reporting that she so often uses.
my loathing of her has certainly increased with her constant bashing of the eagles. most journos have given up on bashing selwood because the tribunal accepted his version of events. for her to continue saying and acting as though he's lying is tantamount to slander.
if she burned in the fiery pits of hell, i would be a happy man.
I used to like Caro and thought she unfairly got a bit of a hard time.
After watching her in action last night however, it was made clear to me that her sensationalist, gossipy and opinionated form of 'journalism' would be better suited to Woman's Day. Not because she's a Woman but because it was absolute trash. That show's a joke.
Caro would know as much about the politics of the game than anyone you care to mention. If you dont think that she has contacts in most AFL clubs that deliberately feed her info for their own gain, then you are sadly deluded. Contacts established over a lifetime of being involved in football because of her father being one of the most succesful powerbrokers in the game in his time at richmond.She is a sports journo, specifically a football one. It would be nice to hear her thoughts on the actual game once in a while.
Mike Sheahan for all his faults still regularly provides an opinion on the game without ignoring the behind the scenes stuff either.
The focus from the media in general on what happens off field is too high IMO as it reduces some sports reporting to Days of Lives levels (eg: the Whitnall saga).
I'm not saying that she shouldn't write on the off field stuff as much of it is important and relevant but her inability to comment on the actual game reinforces the incorrect stereotype of a woman who knows nothing about football.
People are anti Caro because of her looks and the fact she's a woman.
in part, i don't respect her as a journo because she's a woman. well, not because she's a woman, but because of the qualities that come with her being a woman.
when i want soap opera for men, i watch wrestling. i hate the way that caro personalises everything and makes it a soap drama. i don't think men necessarily care about her womens magazine style of reporting that she so often uses.
my loathing of her has certainly increased with her constant bashing of the eagles. most journos have given up on bashing selwood because the tribunal accepted his version of events. for her to continue saying and acting as though he's lying is tantamount to slander.
if she burned in the fiery pits of hell, i would be a happy man.
The AFL should also step in and deregister her as an accredited journalists, her comments regarding Slewood was basically a pack of made up lies...she also made up stuff regarding Russell Ebert
doesn't the media owe a right to the public to hear something that resembles the truth? clearly not!!