West Coast's plodder midfield - will it work?

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
Aug 7, 2016
Posts
1,649
Likes
2,140
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Portland Trail Blazers
#54
I agree that midfield pace isn't important in winning games but you have to admit that speed is pretty dam handy. I mean Dangerfield was the best player in the comp last season and if you took his pace/power away you are left with a Ziebell clone.

Also while the dogs midfield isn't quick one of their real point of differences against Sydney was their run from half back. Sydney had no one to match the likes of JJ, Wood and Biggs.
Dangerfield is a unique beast in the same mould as a Chris Judd. Exceptional ball-winning ability combined with that burst of speed. Danger's acceleration is phenomenal and without that he'd be a different player.

If you have speed, you'll use it. If you can play inside and outside, you'll have many strengths. I still maintain that an inside mid like a S.Mitchell or Greg Williams will always be more important than a Lewis Jetta or the Hill bros.

Not many players can be a Danger, Ablett or Judd. Not many more can be a Parker, Kenneddy, Bontempelli, Mitchell et al. But many people can run fast, whether they're AFL players or not. The outside mids need the inside mids more than the opposite.
 

blitzer

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Posts
5,866
Likes
6,161
Location
House
AFL Club
Essendon
#56
I reckon their midfield will go decently well. It won't be like the top midfield out there but it is above average. I do think that if they were to lose Shuey for any sustained period of time it would be a massive blow to that midfield balance wise. Yes Mitchell and Priddis have great footy smarts and ball winning ability but there simply are times when the opposition have the ball and you have to chase defensively. Will get found out a few times this year by the quicker and deeper midfields.

My take on the ruck situation is - their top guys will still win tons of contested ball around the clearances. What they will lose from not having Naitanui is those occasional perfect taps which lead to basically uncontested clearances where they get a real quality forward 50 entry. Basically they have one less weapon and may need to be able to rebound from D50 a bit more to score some of their points.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2016
Posts
1,121
Likes
731
AFL Club
Fremantle
#58
I think Nic Nats real benefit is making those around him play better and with confidence, picking up mitchell will add that same dimension.
For the opposition, you cant tag all of them so at least one of the mids will have a good game. Very good pickup
 

Skiparoo

Team Captain
Joined
Apr 21, 2016
Posts
310
Likes
355
Location
Sydney
AFL Club
North Melbourne
#59
West Coast are a real premiership threat, obviously they would be better if NicNat was fit and firing, but with the class of Priddis, Mitchell and the likes they are smart enough footballers to rove to the opposition ruckmen, gees Mitchell has been doing it his whole career.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2016
Posts
1,121
Likes
731
AFL Club
Fremantle
#60
West Coast are a real premiership threat, obviously they would be better if NicNat was fit and firing, but with the class of Priddis, Mitchell and the likes they are smart enough footballers to rove to the opposition ruckmen, gees Mitchell has been doing it his whole career.
Not sure why but eagles fans dont think priddis is classy, guy's a machine but cant get no love from his own team
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Obeanie1

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Posts
18,351
Likes
11,416
Location
Darwin
AFL Club
West Coast
#62
Not sure why but eagles fans dont think priddis is classy, guy's a machine but cant get no love from his own team
Haters gotta hate. Eagles fans are no different from any club, some just don't have the IQ to see a great player and focus on the negative too much. The Priddis Debate thread is a war zone between the Pro Priddis team versus the haters. Gets pretty heated in there at times.

Priddis years ago did struggle with decision making and his kicking, over te last 4 or so years he has really improved both. This year his job is easier still, handball to Mitchell, or Shuey or Gaff.......that's it.:D
 

Obeanie1

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Posts
18,351
Likes
11,416
Location
Darwin
AFL Club
West Coast
#63
I reckon their midfield will go decently well. It won't be like the top midfield out there but it is above average. I do think that if they were to lose Shuey for any sustained period of time it would be a massive blow to that midfield balance wise. Yes Mitchell and Priddis have great footy smarts and ball winning ability but there simply are times when the opposition have the ball and you have to chase defensively. Will get found out a few times this year by the quicker and deeper midfields.

My take on the ruck situation is - their top guys will still win tons of contested ball around the clearances. What they will lose from not having Naitanui is those occasional perfect taps which lead to basically uncontested clearances where they get a real quality forward 50 entry. Basically they have one less weapon and may need to be able to rebound from D50 a bit more to score some of their points.


Which is maybe why Simo has adapted the game plan.

Eagles have a above average forward line and back line. The backline is very good at intercept marks with McGovern, Barrass, Hurn and then Sheppard and Wellingham. The loss of those dominant ruck taps will mean the midfielder will need to play tighter and more defensively because they won't get silver service. Which see as a positive because my view is we were too loose and didn't play close enough to opposition mids at stoppages.

So the plan would be the halve the contest at stoppages and make a scrap of it hoping Priddis or Mitchell shoot out a quality handball or at least pressure the opposition kicks into their forward line, flood a bit, play a loose intercept marking tall backman and when we intercept sling shot from half back with fast handball, run and carry with shot foot passing and attack through the corridor.

Eagles lacked a midfield defensive attitude when Naitanui played, too much focus on attack IMO.
 

Superstar swan

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Posts
18,494
Likes
13,787
AFL Club
Sydney
#68
when you have mitchell in the midfield, you don't need pace. the ball does all the running for you.

west coast is a definite flag contender this year
Flag contender yes, but substantial injuries to either mitchell or kennedy and they will struggle to win games.

Very good 18 but imo significantly falls off of a cliff after that
 

Gavin Excell

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Posts
25,266
Likes
25,458
Location
Bentleigh
AFL Club
Geelong
#70
Haters gotta hate. Eagles fans are no different from any club, some just don't have the IQ to see a great player and focus on the negative too much. The Priddis Debate thread is a war zone between the Pro Priddis team versus the haters. Gets pretty heated in there at times.

Priddis years ago did struggle with decision making and his kicking, over te last 4 or so years he has really improved both. This year his job is easier still, handball to Mitchell, or Shuey or Gaff.......that's it.:D
does Priddis role change?
 

flyinghi64

Club Legend
Joined
Dec 7, 2006
Posts
2,580
Likes
1,630
Location
perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Perth Scorchers
#72
Quick decision making with slick ball movement but slow leg speed
Vs
Slow dumb decision making and sloppy disposal but quick elite foot speed.

mmmmm, I wonder what is more effective.
 
Top Bottom