Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Super Bowl LVIII Notice Image
New England Patomans v Seattle Microsofts - Live Game Chat Now
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
I agree Buckley has been better, but was merely stating that people are perhaps arguing the case West has performed at a higher level CONSISTENTLY throughout his career, where as Buckley has dropped significantly in the last 2 seasons.
that is simply due to being injured, and being asked to play differing roles
In every season of his career Buckley has averaged 20+ disposals, even in the last couple when he has split his time between midfield and forward, adding another string to his bow in that he can kick a bag of 6 to go along with 25 disposals now!!
West hasn't managed to average 20+ disposals every year he has played, West has actually played his best football in the last couple of years
Last 6 years for Scott West. I cant find the stats previous to 2000.
2006: 1st with 30.0 disposals per game (Goodwin with 28.2)
2005: 1st with 28.8 disposals per game (Hodge with 28.1)
2004: 1st with 27.4 disposals per game (Lappin with 25.8)
2003: 1st with 28.8 disposals per game (Buckley with 27.3)
2002: 1st with 27.1 disposals per game (Bell with 26.7)
2001: 3rd with 27.5 disposals per game (Bell with 28.3)
2000: 2nd with 29.0 disposals per game (Buckley with 30.1)
Totals:
2000: 667 in 23 games
2001: 606 in 22 games
2002: 488 in 18 games
2003: 633 in 22 games
2004: 603 in 22 games
2005: 633 in 22 games
2006: 719 in 24 games
4349 disposals since 2000 in 153 games at 28.4 disposals per game.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
On pure skill and ability, I voted for Bucks.
Better poll would have been Ricciuto v Buckley.
Ricciuto would that one pretty easy.
no he wouldn't
buckley is a better kick, and is able to find more of the ball
buckley lays more tackles, and wins more clearances
buckley kicks more goals
buckley is a better leader
buckley almost lead his team to a flag
whilst adelaide won a flag without roo, and he goes and gets himself suspended which cost them the 05 flag
buckley easily over ricciuto
ricciuto is better at elbowing blokes and getting suspended tho!!
Scott West purely based on consistancy over a longer period of time and the fact he has had hardly any injuries at all
Are you saying that Mark Ricciuto is a dirty player?
Buckley is a better player, but I reckon you'd rather play along side Scotty West as he wouldn't abuse you for not being as good as him.

Buckley is a better player, but I reckon you'd rather play along side Scotty West as he wouldn't abuse you for not being as good as him.

Buckley is a better player, but I reckon you'd rather play along side Scotty West as he wouldn't abuse you for not being as good as him.
Or West wouldn't abuse you for not kicking the ball to him![]()
![]()
why would the dogs look to give the ball to west when he doesn't kick the ball well!??
the dogs look to give the ball to gilbee at every chance possible, because he is their best kick, the oppostion often leave west alone because he doesn't use it that well.
buckley used to be like gilbee when he was played across HB, but he then went into the middle and won his own ball
Buckley holds the record for 170 clearances in a year
some people have no idea
Or West wouldn't abuse you for not kicking the ball to him![]()
![]()

This poll is a little tighter than i would have thought. Must be plenty of Pies supporters voting!
Or abuse you at the quarter time breaks. Inspiring stuff.![]()
