Could Stewart play in defence?
Think he has played a few games there in the Reserves, Dlanod would know more.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could Stewart play in defence?
I wouldn't mind seeing a decent body of work in the midfield before making that assessment. If we can get some high quality mids through the draft then hopefully in this next generation coming through he can be, at the very least, the cream on top. I actually already think his decision-making for a young player is pretty good.
Keays polled surprisingly well in the B&F. Higher average votes than Bastinac IIRC. I was very underwhelmed by Keays. Might be a good foot soldier but I'm not sure he has an outstanding attribute that will make him a dangerous midfielder.
I think I agree with this sentiment moreso than Leemas. Im a massive fan of his but I don't think he'll ever be a star. His work rate, elite fitness (which I dont think gets talked about enough) and footy nous makes me think he projects more to be a Jack Redden type. A cog in hopefully a very decent midfield
Stewart looked like he could be anything a couple of seasons ago.Wouldnt be cheap.
dlanod ?
Could Stewart play in defence?
Think he has played a few games there in the Reserves, Dlanod would know more.
You'd really want him to play forward because that's the price you'd be paying but he probably wouldn't be ridiculously expensive if he wants out, I'd guess a 2017 second rounder might get it done because he's under contract.
Has he shown enough to warrant this sort of price?
From what I've seen, he's played his best footy as a 2nd/3rd tall forward. It probably isn't a genuine area of weakness for us now.
Useless stat for where and how he was playing anyway. Has as much relevance as rebound 50's. Pressure, tackles 1%ers would be my KPIs for where and how he was playing.Hate this stat but Benny only averaged 80m gained for each match. No impact up front unfortunately
I think you're FLAMIN' rightStewart's nickname upon arrival would almost certainly have to be Alf.
Useless stat for where and how he was playing anyway. Has as much relevance as rebound 50's. Pressure, tackles 1%ers would be my KPIs for where and how he was playing.
I always thought Ben was a midfielder however people say he has played in the forward line. He looks good with ball in hand, just he could never get near it or in position to get it in the forward line.
Played a defensive forward role all year. His role wasnt to get the ball, it was to apply tackling pressure to the small defenders.
What about Frost from Collingwood? Saw something on FB about it
Useless stat for where and how he was playing anyway. Has as much relevance as rebound 50's. Pressure, tackles 1%ers would be my KPIs for where and how he was playing.
This quote related to the comment that Keays had averaged 80m gained for the year.
I completely disagree that its a useless stat for the role he was playing. I think many stats are useless in and of themselves but it is intructive to look at how people perform on particular stats relative to other players. 80m doesn't mean much but when you compare it to many other players in the league it is unusually low amount for metres gained... I just flicked through some 'metres gained' stats (on the AFL app) and struggled to find another player below 150. Hippy was 160m, Green 200m+ Caleb Daniel and Cyril Rioli 250mish, I looked to other 'struggling' young forwards and found Ben Lennon from Richmond was ~190m and the closest comparitor I found was Long from Essendon at 135m (I think he played the last 3 games of the season)
Clearly I'm wrong based on the B&F voting but how someone who many people on this board thought was playing as a midfielder only managed to gain 80m per game is beyond me. To me it shows he offers almost nothing going in the forward direction, as I posted the other day generally the role of forwards at any half decent club is to be a link player between defence and attack - he should be getting out in the open on the wing at least a few times a game and creating forward momentum for us. Clearly he isn't spreading (sorry to use that word) enough to create those opportunities for himself which then generate 'metres gained'. (how many times have we watched average opposition players get those cheap possessions this season? I know we are the s**t team but they must be there for our players to get occasionally, Bewick seems to for example (233m gained)).
The low metres gained has also reminded me that in watching him I've noticed he handballs a lot and the stats bare that out - averages are roughly 3.5 kicks and 6.5 handballs. Often a case (to me) of get ball, handball to someone else, 'job done' in his possessions.
As I said in that earlier post I don't agree with the original post that he should be delisted or traded, I think he has shown reasonable skills and good tackling pressure to suggest he can 'make it.' I believe its an indictment on the club that he played 16 games this year and on our standards that he polled well in the B&F and that people on this board are saying having a unusually low metres gained figure is acceptable.
I would think a player like Hipwood only has to have a few shots on goal from outside or around 50m to drop short to rack up 160m gained.Metres gained is simply the distance between where a player takes possession and the point of the next player’s disposal, no matter if the disposal is made by friend or foe.
Stewart's nickname upon arrival would almost certainly have to be Alf.
that role should be for the less talented
This quote related to the comment that Keays had averaged 80m gained for the year.
I completely disagree that its a useless stat for the role he was playing. I think many stats are useless in and of themselves but it is intructive to look at how people perform on particular stats relative to other players. 80m doesn't mean much but when you compare it to many other players in the league it is unusually low amount for metres gained... I just flicked through some 'metres gained' stats (on the AFL app) and struggled to find another player below 150. Hippy was 160m, Green 200m+ Caleb Daniel and Cyril Rioli 250mish, I looked to other 'struggling' young forwards and found Ben Lennon from Richmond was ~190m and the closest comparitor I found was Long from Essendon at 135m (I think he played the last 3 games of the season)
Clearly I'm wrong based on the B&F voting but how someone who many people on this board thought was playing as a midfielder only managed to gain 80m per game is beyond me. To me it shows he offers almost nothing going in the forward direction, as I posted the other day generally the role of forwards at any half decent club is to be a link player between defence and attack - he should be getting out in the open on the wing at least a few times a game and creating forward momentum for us. Clearly he isn't spreading (sorry to use that word) enough to create those opportunities for himself which then generate 'metres gained'. (how many times have we watched average opposition players get those cheap possessions this season? I know we are the s**t team but they must be there for our players to get occasionally, Bewick seems to for example (233m gained)).
The low metres gained has also reminded me that in watching him I've noticed he handballs a lot and the stats bare that out - averages are roughly 3.5 kicks and 6.5 handballs. Often a case (to me) of get ball, handball to someone else, 'job done' in his possessions.
As I said in that earlier post I don't agree with the original post that he should be delisted or traded, I think he has shown reasonable skills and good tackling pressure to suggest he can 'make it.' I believe its an indictment on the club that he played 16 games this year and on our standards that he polled well in the B&F and that people on this board are saying having a unusually low metres gained figure is acceptable.