Why are some clubs happy to take help & others fighting hard to avoid it? Exactly what does a club give up versus standing on its own two feet, not just independence.
Carlton seemed to be going meekly: https://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/584787/logiudice-preparing-for-a-number-of-scenarios
Essendon dont want a bar of it: https://www.cessnockadvertiser.com.au/story/6722533/essendon-wont-seek-afl-funds-president/
The media have reported Freo going both ways.
Will the categorising of the clubs, the different treatment of the clubs actually do any harm to the fabric of the game, further entrench the haves & the 'have nots'.
If anyone has seen anything on the detail on this issue, pls contribute.
Carlton seemed to be going meekly: https://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/584787/logiudice-preparing-for-a-number-of-scenarios
Essendon dont want a bar of it: https://www.cessnockadvertiser.com.au/story/6722533/essendon-wont-seek-afl-funds-president/
The media have reported Freo going both ways.
Will the categorising of the clubs, the different treatment of the clubs actually do any harm to the fabric of the game, further entrench the haves & the 'have nots'.
If anyone has seen anything on the detail on this issue, pls contribute.