owen87
Premium Gold
- Apr 23, 2016
- 30,809
- 43,172
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Is there a magic rule that you have to quote an entire post?
When you're trying to claim he hasn't said something, despite having said it in the very post you're quoting. Yes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Is there a magic rule that you have to quote an entire post?
Good thing you're here to keep everyone in line.When you're trying to claim he hasn't said something, despite having said it in the very post you're quoting. Yes.
Good thing you're here
I'm quite satisfied with my response to your deeply unsophisticated arguments.
But... but... WC are 7th on the ladder so how can NicNat be the best!!!!!
That's not its simplest form. It's a ridiculous ring-a-rosey.Here is the argument in its simplest form
You say intercept marks and intercept possessions are more important? OK. I mean, that's an argument.Marks from opposition kicks and getting intercept possessions that create turnovers do have a strong correlation to winning games of football.
That's not a fact at all. It's simply the case that there aren't many truly elite ruckmen and various teams have won with ruckmen that vary in quality and in style.You value taps and clearances for a ruckman above other metrics … it’s a fact that Premiership teams don’t.
How about all of them? There is no single metric that outweighs everything. It's a combination of all of them, plus objectively viewing them play.That's not its simplest form. It's a ridiculous ring-a-rosey.
What metric is more important for ruckmen than impact on stoppages?
You say intercept marks and intercept possessions are more important? I mean, that's an argument.
In that case, I guess Reilly O'Brien is your pick of the league's ruckmen because he has the most intercept marks and the most intercept possessions?
You should start a thread insisting that Reilly O'Brien is the best ruckman in the league because of this prized new criteria and see how you go.
This is waffle.How about all of them? There is no single metric that outweighs everything. It's a combination of all of them, plus objectively viewing them play.
He's the standout tap ruckman and also far away away the best clearance player among rucks.Nic Nat is so good at 1 area
There are a lot of stats now. It use to be easy, hit outs. Now, not so much as there are dozens of different stats.This is waffle.
What is the most important metric for a ruckman?
Your response is "nah dunno"?
I'm not doing that. I'm saying impact at stoppages, which encompasses several stats, is the key metric.Trying to drill it down to one stat is your strawman argument that Nic Nat is the best ruck because of X stat.
As if I need 2000 words to make fools of you guys.Just saying... someone needs to get a job and stop with 2000 word thesis responses. We get it bro... you have a crush. Give it a rest
Yeah… I’ve watched the Eagles the last 8-weeks and they do look pretty strong in defence and attack…. . They’re also dominating clearances
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
As if I need 2000 words to make fools of you guys.
But yes I plead guilty to loving NicNat.
Please, don't kid yourself. You're not close to achieving this.Make fools of? You have such delusions of grandeur that anyone could compile the most logical, factually valid arguments and you would simply dismiss them because they don't fit with your narrative.
It is a waste of time in even replying to someone like that.
Please, don't kid yourself. You're not close to achieving this.
You need someone else to burst my bubble? Because you're not capable?Righto... ever seen the bar scene in Good Will Hunting? If not, go have a look. You remind me of the bloke with the blonde pony tail. Looking forward to a Will coming in to burst your bubble
You need someone else to burst my bubble? Because you're not capable?
That says it all.
You're clearly not a believer in original comebacks or coherent arguments.Nah, I've just got a life and I'm also a firm believer that arguing with an idiot makes yourself one also. Have a good night
He and Big Scotty Lycett were The Natural Disasters.Not going to read the thread but to answer the OP, they can play full games.
Nick Nat can only wrestle in tag team matches.
He and Big Scotty Lycett were The Natural Disasters.
Remember when NicNat wore Parfitt like a suit?
Nah it was in the year we won the flag. The most recent one, not one of the two where we beat Geelong in the GF.Nope. Was that in the 97 point loss at Geelong where Nick Nat managed to play 60% of the game and wouldn't run out of the centre square?
Great ruckman but he can't play a full game.
Slightly bizarre.For as good as NicNat is, he wouldn’t deserve to be in the same changeroom as TI & Polly.
OK, show me the numbers.Another metric to measure a player by, is how did they go against their direct opponent ?.