My post was indicating what I said in response to the claims re Pagan........hopefully some people are beginning to understand that the playing group has some major problems.
IMO any playing group that decides not to give its all for its coach has some serious character defects. I made this arguement when it was reported, and since confirmed, that Pagan had "lost" the group.
This to me indicates a mentally weak group. If they weren't giving Dennis 100%, how the **** are we to judge his game plan. That was my point last year, as IMO any group of players that chooses when it will "switch on" is doomed to have nights where it is clearly switched off.
Are they giving Ratts 100%?
We are further progressed than 2003, but sadly we still have a too many players who are either not fit (Stevens, Judd, Hadley, Pfeiffer, Hampson, Fisher) surrounded by "B" graders who aren't skillful enough to take up the slcak on a consistent basis (Carrazzo, Simpson, Scotland, Bentick, Blackwell, Russell, Betts), who in turn are surrounded by some good kids (Murph and Gibbs) who are good enough but haven't yet got the consitency.
No way Scotland and Simpson are in that b grade bracket, as far as our side goes they are at the top of the heap, continually give a contest and know how to use the ball! And more importantly, both really seem to love playing! Both are miles ahead of Carazzo, Bentick, Blackwell, Russell and Betts, miles!!!
Admittedly Scotland was average tonight, but he has made the side look better than it is for ages now!



