- Banned
- #26
Thanks TGBut apparently we are forbidden to use the youth, experience thing as any sort of excuse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Thanks TGBut apparently we are forbidden to use the youth, experience thing as any sort of excuse.
Like I've already said, we should add Tarks. Fix that right upJust some perspective on where we are at;
![]()
Obviously we get a bit older if you add Howe, Varcoe, Sidebottom, Toovey and maybe Goldsack to our 22. And of course Swan.
Just some perspective on where we are at;
![]()
Obviously we get a bit older if you add Howe, Varcoe, Sidebottom, Toovey and maybe Goldsack to our 22. And of course Swan.
Stay positive my friend.Varcoe, Howe and Sidebottom will make that Older. Toovey and Goldsack looking like they might not be Best 22. Swan is not looking good for him to comeback
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Stay positive my friend.
Don't jump off the Goldsack bandwagon, he's a must for our 22. The doubters will see this upon his return. The guy does the intangibles so well, and it's those types (Blair, Sinclair ect) who make good sides better, not just the Treloars, Sidebottoms ect.
Swanny will be back, Swanny has never taken anything lying back. He'll come back and if fairytales are real, he'll go out on his own terms with a second Premiership medal.![]()
He's not that bad. He'd be doing a lot better than what the current back 6 have dished up. Especially with our inexperience at the moment, he'd be more than handy.Goldsack needs to do the tangibles better.
Thanks TG
I'm liking your post because I agree with the premise. I'm just not sure it applies to Goldsack. He is a perennial 22-26 player on the list. He should be playing twelve games a year and being selected for need (match-up) rather than ability if we want to take the next step. See 2010.Stay positive my friend.
Don't jump off the Goldsack bandwagon, he's a must for our 22. The doubters will see this upon his return. The guy does the intangibles so well, and it's those types (Blair, Sinclair ect) who make good sides better, not just the Treloars, Sidebottoms ect.
Swanny will be back, Swanny has never taken anything lying back. He'll come back and if fairytales are real, he'll go out on his own terms with a second Premiership medal.![]()
He's not that bad. He'd be doing a lot better than what the current back 6 have dished up. Especially with our inexperience at the moment, he'd be more than handy.
Sorry, according to Wikipedia, both 1 and 2 cent coins ceased production in 1990 and were withdrawn from circulation in 1992.Really? That would make me 4. I remember them well. What about the 2c?
Just some perspective on where we are at;
![]()
Obviously we get a bit older if you add Howe, Varcoe, Sidebottom, Toovey and maybe Goldsack to our 22. And of course Swan.
I thought so!!! No way I had that good a memory for a 4 year old.Sorry, according to Wikipedia, both 1 and 2 cent coins ceased production in 1990 and were withdrawn from circulation in 1992.
Thx for the table Matty, i think the really key thing with the younger guys, say the 10 under 50 gamers plus those not playing such as Broomhead, Sharenberg, Witts and recent draftees,is have they got the range and spread of talent to take us into the top 4 of the competition? Who is most likely to take the steps to A grade?I think we should expect some disappointment from those calling for players without a senior game to their name to come into the line up!
Taking in to account Mattys table why on earth would we want to go younger? This is the third year of our list transformation. If we're going to track towards a premiership in the near future its a finals year and unless they are absolutely banging down the door (which they aren't at this stage), no debuts.
Also perhaps expect some tweaking to our stoppage structure (at least I hope so) because if we continue as is we're every chance to wind up bottom 6.
Sydney, wowee!
Sydney, wowee!