Blackas87
Brownlow Medallist
Why?Yes i would change that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Why?Yes i would change that.
That's incorrect.If they shorten the game i stop going as its not worth the long drive down to geelong for a shorter game. The attention spam stuff is rubbish. Its only because you boomers are getting old that you think the game is too long.
The game should be kept flowing. Free kicks for any ball oob. Watch the lack of need for time-on. TAC cup games are 25 minutes, ok, that is a fair compromise, 25 minutes, no time on. 100 minutes is 100 minutes.If people dont understand why the concept of time on is needed then there is something seriously wrong.
You didnt mention the oob fre kick. But you still need time on for when players hurt themselves, feign cramps, kick/rush points, cause ball ups and kick goals. The playing time needs to be consistent. I would add time on for anyone who nominates to take a shot at goal to prevent them from wasting 20 seconds of game time. Who exactly cares if it means we dont know the exact time of the day the game will finish.The game should be kept flowing. Free kicks for any ball oob. Watch the lack of need for time-on. TAC cup games are 25 minutes, ok, that is a fair compromise, 25 minutes, no time on. 100 minutes is 100 minutes.
To give consistency in playing time across qtrs and games. To disincentivize clubs rushing the ball out of bounds to waste time when in the lead. This is all pretty obvious stuff.Why?
No, TAC games work well.You didnt mention the oob fre kick. But you still need time on for when players hurt themselves, feign cramps, kick/rush points, cause ball ups and kick goals. The playing time needs to be consistent. I would add time on for anyone who nominates to take a shot at goal to prevent them from wasting 20 seconds of game time. Who exactly cares if it means we dont know the exact time of the day the game will finish.
Its not extra time. Its ensuring game time is consistent. Your lack of understanding of fairness in this regard is quite poor.No, TAC games work well.
Rules are already put into place to prevent time wasting with shots at goal. The game is the game. Extra time allowances do not help.
The game is just too long and many people are bored.
It seems those that aren't spend a lot of time drinking and pissing. Are we catering for that?
Nothing about the AFL comp is about fairness.Its not extra time. Its ensuring game time is consistent. Your lack of understanding of fairness in this regard is quite poor.
The playing time is consistent, 20 minutes of playing time every qtr.To give consistency in playing time across qtrs and games. To disincentivize clubs rushing the ball out of bounds to waste time when in the lead. This is all pretty obvious stuff.
One of the West Coast midfielders will get lost in the shuffle with the addition of Tim Kelly. With an already elite midfield I feel that adding another star midfielder with Kelly may cause one midfielder to see a drop in form or lack of reliance on them, I don't know who it would be, could be Kelly for all we know, but I feel at least one will get out of place.
Bailey Scott > Bailey Smith > Bailey WilliamsBailey Smith > Sam Walsh
Time allowed to kick for goal should be the same as elsewhere on the ground.
Remove "push in the back". Bring back "Hands in the back"
Stupid and unpopular are not mutually exclusive.The recasting of stupid statements as merely "unpopular" is clearly a prerequisite for muppets to consider themselves "free thinkers" as opposed to just muppets.
Bailey Smith > Bailey Scott > Bailey Dale > Bailey WilliamsBailey Scott > Bailey Smith > Bailey Williams
Bailey Charlie!Bailey Smith > Bailey Scott > Bailey Dale > Bailey Williams
Damn it I knew there was one I was missingBailey Charlie!