Sttew
Brownlow Medallist
Goes to show just how deep the losing culture is in a club starved of success for so long
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
It's certainly not the only factor though. It feels like there's just not enough defensive pressure in the side, and there's no obvious Plan B if they can't win the ball.
Winning form going into next season is more important than pick 3 compared to pick 7 or 8.There goal now is a top 3 pick and a good draw fir next season.
Joke of a club
Injuries and fittness, a large chunk of best 22 didnt take part in preseason main group training, and it really shows in structures and set ups and coheasion. What hurt with injuries to the best 22 players is that a lot of the time the player that would move into that spot was injured or already playing out of position covering another injury and first picks of depth players were injured and so on resulting in players like sparrow getting games early or out of form injury carrying players being forced to play. Starting to get better and get players back from injury now and get some winning form is very important for next yearNo team has ever just bounced back in recent time (very rare). They are done. Windows shut
Think
No excuses. You can't just reset and blame it on injuries. Every team listed blamed it on injuries. The games evolved. New style is needed for them no such thing a magic switch.
- Western Bulldogs
- Wce 2016
- Fremantle
- Crows 2018
- Port
Agree totally but does the club look ar it that way?Winning form going into next season is more important than pick 3 compared to pick 7 or 8.
Injuries and fittness, a large chunk of best 22 didnt take part in preseason main group training, and it really shows in structures and set ups and coheasion. What hurt with injuries to the best 22 players is that a lot of the time the player that would move into that spot was injured or already playing out of position covering another injury and first picks of depth players were injured and so on resulting in players like sparrow getting games early or out of form injury carrying players being forced to play. Starting to get better and get players back from injury now and get some winning form is very important for next year
Of course, thats why they're getting players fit and bringing them in, and showing improvement in the west coast game and adelaide game. I think every club is clear that gaining lower draft picks and promoting a losing culture damages the club far more than an improvement of a couple of spots in the draft can make up. Drafts a lottery, would you tank from pick 5 (ollie wines) down to pick 3 (jimmy toumpass).Agree totally but does the club look ar it that way?
I think the first couple of rounds 666 could have had an impact, richmond, collingwood, and 15 other clubs had the same rules applied and adapted.Interesting to see the 6-6-6 rule hasn't been brought up. Melbourne regularly had used a extra player or 2 off the back of the square at centre bounces to help with the clearance work. Would be interested to see how effective is was vs the 6-6-6 for efficiency out of the clearances last year.
On this, post-Lever injury their defence was shot until they started to use Gawn as a spare. That has definitely taken a bit away from them IMO.Interesting to see the 6-6-6 rule hasn't been brought up. Melbourne regularly had used a extra player or 2 off the back of the square at centre bounces to help with the clearance work. Would be interested to see how effective is was vs the 6-6-6 for efficiency out of the clearances last year.
But not every team setup the same way at centre bounces. Collingwood for instance last year setup in roughly the current 6-6-6 setup 70% of the time and were in the top 3. Some clubs were in the 40% range with a 6-6-6 setup.I think the first couple of rounds 666 could have had an impact, richmond, collingwood, and 15 other clubs had the same rules applied and adapted.
How so? Gawn still played ruck and was in the centre for the bounce anyway so nothing has changed there. If he's not doing it this year then it is by design rather than the 6-6-6 rule.On this, post-Lever injury their defence was shot until they started to use Gawn as a spare. That has definitely taken a bit away from them IMO.
Injuries are smacking them around - thats a significant injury list theyve got
It worked agaisnt lower teams but got found out against the better midfields. On our march to the finals and our final wins, we set up more tradionally and coincided with our better form. While the 2 off the back worked well when we won clear possession, it also left us open when we didnt.But not every team setup the same way at centre bounces. Collingwood for instance last year setup in roughly the current 6-6-6 setup 70% of the time and were in the top 3. Some clubs were in the 40% range with a 6-6-6 setup.
Melbourne liked to use the 1 or 2 off the back of the square as attacking players. I don't know the efficiency when compared to 6-6-6 but Goodwin wouldn't have used it as often as he did if he didn't think it offered something you couldn't get in a normal 6-6-6 setup. I'm a bit surprised one of the footy analyst hasn't looked deeper into it as they would have the numbers to compare.
It's an odd year.
Melbourne don't like odd years. They have made the finals only once in an odd year - 2005 - since 1991 and were quickly send packing by the Cats. Melbourne were well noted for their strange season form in the late 1990s and early 2000s when they went from last in 1997 to 4th in 1998, back down to 14th in 1999, runner up in 2000, slipping to 12th in 2001, back up to 6th in 2002, 14th in 2003 and 7th in 2004.
Good news for the Demons - next year is not only an even year but a leap year too. The Dees like leap years, winning the 1900, 1940, 1948, 1956, 1960 and 1964 premierships, while their only grand final appearances since 1964 have been in 1988 and 2000, both leap years. Maybe next year Melbourne will finally break a premiership drought of 56 years?
If Melbourne are so s**t how come your mob only managed to get on top of us by two points after we kicked 8 behinds in the last quarter?Seriously what has happened here??? Can’t see any threads on how disappointing they have been this year and feel like they are getting away with it
There’s no need to pay out on him or Adelaide mate, it’s a legitimate question the OP has posed.If Melbourne are so **** how come your mob only managed to get on top of us by two points after we kicked 8 behinds in the last quarter?
(and how was Tex Walkers celebration when he finally kicked a goal, he looked like he'd just nailed the premiership. What an absolute flog, even the commentators said he looked like a dick).
Anyway to answer your question:
Injuries, players out of form, lack of depth, poor off-season.
First year in many we've gone backwards (which happens to every team) so I'm not going to have a meltdown just yet.
We didn’t have May and Lever for finals wins last year. It’s not ideal, but it’s not the primary reason. Right now all those two would is put an extra few bandaids on a haemorrhageInjuries are smacking them around - thats a significant injury list theyve got
You would have won if they were playing on the weekend.We didn’t have May and Lever for finals wins last year. It’s not ideal, but it’s not the primary reason. Right now all those two would is put an extra few bandaids on a haemorrhage