Why wasn't Hind dropped for poring his latte in Rutten's lap?
When a player snubs the coach on national TV....
- Thread starter Sttew
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Stuffed if I know.
Maybe it is from the annual show called "That was the Season That Was"
If you can find the season Zantuck did that maybe the rest of video is on youtube.
I think a few of those shows people have uploaded over the seasons.
I actually found That Was The Season That was for that season and it a round 14 clash but the spot where I found it does not have Superboot next so it not from there.
It probably from World of Sport on the Sunday where they show a 3 or 4 minute segment of highlights of Saturday matches the next day.
That less likely to be uploaded to youtube.
Superboot I assume you know the player it refers to.
- Banned
- #80
OK boomer
- Banned
- #81
Yep, this.
For mine he was checking the big screen to see the 50n penalty. Maybe seeing if he was hard done by or perhaps whether he agreed with the decision in hindsight.
- Oct 18, 2016
- 5,068
- 9,795
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #83
I don't get it, what does this change?
- Banned
- #84
Essendon propaganda, thats whats different
killtaker1993
Club Legend
- Sep 17, 2021
- 1,865
- 4,459
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Maybe Rutten ate some chilli the night before and dropped his guts right when Hind got to the bench. From his hind quarters
jim boy
Umpires Association Head
- Admin
- #87
Thanks for looking - was that 1984? The roys didnt play the saints in round 14 at any time that Barassi was coach at the dees. Perhaps it was the round 10 match between the roys and the saints at VFL match - Superboot kicked 6.5 that day. The return match was at the Junction oval, but the vision looks like Waverly (especially as not all matches had much vision). maybe the show was some sort of VFL park retrospective, both matches being at that ground.
Hard to know My final guess is it was some channel 7 footy award night where during the coverage they would sometimes show interesting bits of the season between the actual award ceremonies. As you said it not the same round 14 so it not World of Sport, The Big League Replay show or That Was The Season That Was 1984.
Last edited:
Is that what a lot of BF posters do? just exchange scrolling through an entire match with scrolling through someone’s post history to try to uncover some obscure post made weeks/months ago for a gotcha moment.
Agreed, from my cafe work time it was often women from 35-50 and slightly older brotacular businessmen who were the bad customers, but of course there were many exceptions.
What an odd imagination you have
- Banned
- #92
Theyre probably just disappointed that blacks, guys and women are allowed to participate nowYeah but young Nick got a participation award once and society has been in a death spiral ever since.
BringOn2017
Cancelled
- Apr 27, 2016
- 415
- 764
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Imagine this happening to Clarkson or Longmire…
Genuine question to Essendon fans. If This is the response from a player to coach on game day in front of cameras, what is the response when the coach talks about defensive accountability in reviews and training standards in general ?
It is not the looking away part that concerns me the most, it’s the overt way of trying not to sit next to your coach when he pats the seat next to him. That is just disrespectful, especially to a guy that is feeling the pressure.
Genuine question to Essendon fans. If This is the response from a player to coach on game day in front of cameras, what is the response when the coach talks about defensive accountability in reviews and training standards in general ?
It is not the looking away part that concerns me the most, it’s the overt way of trying not to sit next to your coach when he pats the seat next to him. That is just disrespectful, especially to a guy that is feeling the pressure.
You see hundreds of customers per day, I guarantee a few will treat you like s**t. Hospo taught me a lot about people.
Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 97,285
- 235,202
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #96
It changes nothing.
The idea that the player has some right to just ignore the coach because he might be a little tired or flustered after the free kick is pretty funny.
Imagine if every player that was dragged did this.
Yep, it’s just a ridiculous justification.It changes nothing.
The idea that the player has some right to just ignore the coach because he might be a little tired or flustered after the free kick is pretty funny.
Imagine if every player that was dragged did this.
If I decided to blank my manager like that at work because I was upset, I would be absolutely screwed. Like, Chat With HR level screwed. Deservedly so.
Sequence of events:
1. Essendon nearly 10 goals up in the last quarter.
2. Hind nearly concussed by tackle that leads to a fine for Lazzaro
3. Hind gives away free kick for dissent, hardly a surprise given his head just got slammed in to the marvel car park.
4. Hind comes off, no clear seat on the bench as other Essendon player taking up 2 seats. Has awkward by play with said player determining which way he’ll slide to make room. Unsurprisingly after giving away a goal he doesn’t want to sit right next to the coach
5. Hind - most likely dazed or watching the replay - has a few words said to him by Rutten. With the game clearly as over as Essendon’s season it’s likely to be either a simple message to avoid dissent or just as likely the coach checking he’s ok after being dumped in the tackle. Either way, not exactly a vital exchange.
This is classic Cornes-ism. Playing the results to fit a narrative.
1. Essendon nearly 10 goals up in the last quarter.
2. Hind nearly concussed by tackle that leads to a fine for Lazzaro
3. Hind gives away free kick for dissent, hardly a surprise given his head just got slammed in to the marvel car park.
4. Hind comes off, no clear seat on the bench as other Essendon player taking up 2 seats. Has awkward by play with said player determining which way he’ll slide to make room. Unsurprisingly after giving away a goal he doesn’t want to sit right next to the coach
5. Hind - most likely dazed or watching the replay - has a few words said to him by Rutten. With the game clearly as over as Essendon’s season it’s likely to be either a simple message to avoid dissent or just as likely the coach checking he’s ok after being dumped in the tackle. Either way, not exactly a vital exchange.
This is classic Cornes-ism. Playing the results to fit a narrative.
- Apr 27, 2014
- 6,347
- 9,582
- AFL Club
- Richmond
disgraceful from Hind
worse thing you can do to another person is treat them like they don't exist
I would be steaming mad, poor Rutto, credit to him that he swallowed it I suppose, not easy,
worse thing you can do to another person is treat them like they don't exist
I would be steaming mad, poor Rutto, credit to him that he swallowed it I suppose, not easy,
Possibly, but my point of the post was; Given the demands of a 24/7 news cycle (which the AFL media themselves have created) related to the creation of content/discussion points/narratives and headlines, obviously someone has been tasked to scroll through/watch/review the entire broadcast of every game looking for anything 'newsworthy'..!
It's obvious because in recent times these stories have mainly derived from off-field 'incidents' that are not part of the main broadcast, namely players or coaches behaviour in change rooms , or in this specific case a player and coach's interaction on the bench, which I'm pretty sure was not part of/shown during the main broadcast on the day - but has been 'remarkably discovered' in support of the media's 'Sack Rutten' narrative...
Last edited:
Similar threads
