The article I've read has Warner admitting he was wrong to engage Sharma. So going off that it is likely he wasn't asking that question. Otherwise I presume that's what he would've reported.
There were some pretty amusing comments though. One that Warner 'did the polite thing'; not sure he's ever done that to an opposition player. The second howler is when he starts talking about cricket etiquette - no modern cricketer can talk about that with a straight face. We even get it decoded by Lehmann - "It's not an ideal scenario, but we've got to make sure we're playing the cricket we want to play without crossing the line". Which is basically translated as "nothing to see here, carry on".