- Thread starter
- #226
You dont think winning group 1s is an indicator of any value?Actually there's other far more accurate ways of assessing them, and believe it or not that's what people do. And winx is better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You dont think winning group 1s is an indicator of any value?Actually there's other far more accurate ways of assessing them, and believe it or not that's what people do. And winx is better.
Ratings are totally flawed, especially when rating in different eras. Different conditions, no watering tracks, different weight scsles
ive been thinking about it and although i am no fan at all of Lohnro i reckon he would beat her between 1400m to 1600m in a 5 horse crappy WFA race
You dont think winning group 1s is an indicator of any value?
i have never used them, i did it the hard way and watched every single race.. over and over back in the day and could map most races in my head. (in those days races werent rigged by jockeys managers either).There was a time where you could name any horse in Australia and i could tell you its breeding, trainer, best distances, racing pattern and limitations off the top of my head. That was pre 2000, that edge was taken away from me (the internet and old age loss of memory!)When you do them properly they are not flawed at all. They have their limitations but done correctly they are the most accurate way of measuring performances.
i have never used them, i did it the hard way and watched every single race.. over and over back in the day and could map most races in my head. (in those days races werent rigged by jockeys managers either).There was a time where you could name any horse in Australia and i could tell you its breeding, trainer, best distances, racing pattern and limitations off the top of my head. That was pre 2000, that edge was taken away from me (the internet and old age loss of memory!)
Anyway, i get that it is an accurate measure of peformance on the day, Hong Kong would be perfect for using ratings because its the same horses over and over on 2 tracks, but when rating thousands of horses over hundreds of tracks you cannot accurately rate a race in 2017 and 1996
explain away (i dont rate Sunline by the way , Northerly is a different story)Yes you can.
I can tell you, accurately, that Sunline and Northerly would not have won a Cox plate between them had Winx been in those races, for example.
explain away (i dont rate Sunline by the way , Northerly is a different story)
Possibly. Or deliberately misinterpreting.I wasn't aware I said that. Could it be you're misquoting me?
Is there an argument that ratings are biased towards modern achievememts given improvements in diets, preparation etc?Her 2016 performance is about 3L better than their best.
They were both great horses and both champions but they weren't at her level.
Takeover Target was a champion too but he wouldn't have kept up with black caviar. Joe Janiak even conceded same. They're next level BC and Winx.
Is there an argument that ratings are biased towards modern achievememts given improvements in diets, preparation etc?
what i am getting at is you are basing your ratings on the other races on the day as well? cos i cant see how you can do that otherwise. what if the horses were better overall that day? Thats the flaw in the ratings. It also doesnt take intangibles like Northerly not letting horses past him and other quirks horses have.Her 2016 performance is about 3L better than their best.
They were both great horses and both champions but they weren't at her level.
Takeover Target was a champion too but he wouldn't have kept up with black caviar. Joe Janiak even conceded same. They're next level BC and Winx.
what i am getting at is you are basing your ratings on the other races on the day as well? cos i cant see how you can do that otherwise. what if the horses were better overall that day? Thats the flaw in the ratings. It also doesnt take intangibles like Northerly not letting horses past him and other quirks horses have.
FWIW i am coming around to Winx being the best horse we have seen for a long time, but you just cannot say that categorically.
flawed dataYou can't say categorically because you're looking at a video and guessing. He can say it categorically, because data.
Correction Saintly was beaten in the Craven (As) Stakes and the time honoured Cox Plate lead up, the Metropolitan.
Bloody hell
why do you guys rate European racing? i dont follow it but from what i see they race on cow paddocks, their prize money is s**t, they only race over jumps for a lot of the seasons, their sprinters cant get out of their own way and the owners are mostly elite snobs and arabs. #makethemtravel
Jesus, check out some Frankel footage on youtube and listen to the Poms go on about him being better than Secretariat, Sea Bird, Dancing Brave etc.
ive been thinking about it and although i am no fan at all of Lohnro i reckon he would beat her between 1400m to 1600m in a 5 horse crappy WFA race
Is there an argument that ratings are biased towards modern achievememts given improvements in diets, preparation etc?
flawed data
what i am getting at is you are basing your ratings on the other races on the day as well? cos i cant see how you can do that otherwise. what if the horses were better overall that day? Thats the flaw in the ratings. It also doesnt take intangibles like Northerly not letting horses past him and other quirks horses have.
FWIW i am coming around to Winx being the best horse we have seen for a long time, but you just cannot say that categorically.
Black Caviar broke 1 track record in very dodge circumstances but was hardly let go in most of her other racesOne can account for such things
if the 1990's middle distance horses were travelling overseas and being very competitive (yes the japan cup argument again but the horses came from everywhere and that was the only race to get a guage on and it wasnt in australia) nowdays our middle distance horses cannot get out of their own way.
so how is todays racing better?
Black Caviar broke 1 track record in very dodge circumstances but was hardly let go in most of her other races
how do you rate her not being let go?
Hareeba smashed the track record at Moonee Valley running 1.7.00 with 59kgs prior to it being resurfaced how do you account for that?