Remove this Banner Ad

Where to now for the Fitzroy Football Club?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roylion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Joined
Oct 17, 2000
Posts
20,284
Reaction score
18,293
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
Other Teams
Fitzroy Football Club
I posted the following on the Brisbane Board a couple of days ago, to see whether any Roys who now follow the Brisbane Lions would be interested in making a comment about a serious football topic, that has a bearing on their club. However it appears that the Brisbane posters were more interested in talking about how they were going to beat the number of posts that the Kangaroo board currently have. The lack of response also appears to indicate little interest in Fitzroy or its current doings by Brisbane fans and maybe strengthens the case for a seperate Fitzroy board on Big Footy, where these sort of things can be discussed.

Anyway I'd be interested in Fitzroy people's views on the following. I hope to give some feedback from supporters to a couple of the directors of the FFC that I have regular contact with, as to what FFC should / could be doing in the future. If there is little to no response here (and I know there are few old Fitzroy supporters who read these boards) and who perhaps don't read the Brisbane Board, well that also says something about the FFC's future.


Where to now for the Fitzroy Football Club Ltd? The latest disappointing news is that apparently is the City of Yarra, in response to a Victorian State Government decision to cap the number of poker machines in the state has refused the Fitzroy Football Club’s application to manage pokies in their intended social club at Rising Sun Hotel. Rather than appeal the decision which could take two-three years to resolve, the FFC Ltd., has decided not to pursue the Rising Sun as an option for a social club. This is a bitter blow for the many people that support the Fitzroy Football Club.
An U/19 team which was intended to be run by the FFC Ltd., for the 2001 season has also not come to fruition at least for this year.

Apparently Fitzroy and Tasmania were talking about the possibility of aligning to place a team in the VFL. Despite being approached by Tasmania originally, the FFC board asked for the proposal in writing and received no further response. According to one Fitzroy director I know, the proposal had “cold water” (his words) poured over it, not by Tasmania, but by the VFL itself. Tasmania not wishing to jeopardise it’s entry into the VFL therefore dropped the proposal.

Preston and Fitzroy have also been talking, but while Preston are keen to have Fitzroy’s money and members (well over 1,000) they aren’t, according to my information, prepared to give enough guarantees about Fitzroy’s identity or corporate independence or enough representation on their board.

The question therefore is what should the FFC Ltd do in the future? On the face of it, it would seem that the board of FFC Ltd. as the last legally elected board should be the logical body that should manage the growing Victorian arm of the Brisbane Lions. However for various reasons this is very unlikely to occur. As it stands the Fitzroy ‘family’ remains divided. The VFL, who you would think stands most to gain from having at least a couple of thousand Fitzroy diehards attending it's fixtures on a regular basis appears to be deliberatly discouraging a Fitzroy presence and identity in its competition, which quite frankly I find very surprising.

In a way this division may spell the end of both the FFC Ltd. and also any aspirations that the Brisbane Lions have of building Victorian membership much beyond 3,000, even though it is obvious Brisbane’s supporter base in Victoria is much greater than 3,000. The board of the FFC Ltd. are confident that there is a great deal of latent support for ‘Fitzroy’ out there….. up to at least 60,000 Victorians they believe, but there is little for many of them to focus on without a fair-dinkum Fitzroy side, wearing the old guernsey etc. etc. in a senior Victorian or national side. It was hoped that Coburg-Fitzroy would fulfill this role, but this also fell through, for reasons totally beyond Fitzroy’s control.

FFC has three options open to it in the future in my view. It needs to justify its existence as a football club and run one-two-three sides in different competitions. Otherwise it will disappear completely due to lack of interest.

1. Pursue closer relations with the Brisbane Lions (reciprocal) and use those connections to lobby for a position in the VFL as a stand-alone team bearing the name 'Fitzroy', the colours and the emblem. This new club might have close ties with Brisbane in terms of sponsorship, membership etc and might also have FFC acting as the controller of the Victorian arm of the Brisbane Lions.
2. Continue to support the Fitzroy Reds and Fitzroy Juniors only from the Brunswick Street Ground and eventually establish an U/19 team to operate only in the northern suburbs of Melbourne.
3. Continue to seek a completely independent "alignment" with an existing VFL club, or as some continually hope for, a Melbourne based AFL club to get back into senior Victorian football.

Any comments would be welcomed.
 
Roylion - I did infact read your post - though I am not in a position myself to make comment I don't think. I am however, also intersted in hearing others thoughts on the matter.
 
Definitely option 2 for me.

If at all possible I'd love to see the Reds become the actual playing team of the Fitzroy FC, rather than just naming sponsor etc etc. The Reds should entail the playing operations of the Fitzroy Football Club. If this happens, we should abandon any other outlet and concentrate on making the Reds a powerful team in the Amateur Leagues. If this entails the Juniors becoming part of the Reds as under-age sides, even better.

Fitzroy should do everything in its power to keep a separate identity going, in fact a stand-alone identity. I have no faith in ANY alliance with anyone after what has happened with Coburg. At least if we solely concentrated on the Reds we would be masters of our own destiny once again.

If however, the Reds want to stay somewhat separate from the FFC, then an u/19's team would be the next best option.

My two cents......
 
Sorry, posted too early......

Option 1 would be okay, but can we be assured of the Brisbane clubs goodwill and support for an indefinite period. If the Lions got in trouble financially, I'd suspect we'd be the first one's culled.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I can't see why the old Fitzroy supporters don't get behind the Brisbane Lions.You get to see your team live on TV every second week and see them in melbourne most of the other weeks.Why you would follow Fitzroy in some other crappy league is a mystery to me.Fitzroy is gone,not even Coburg wanted you.
 
Why is the Fitzroy Football club still trading. I thought they went bankrupt.
Why are they trying to become a VFL team again.Trying to undermine the Brisbane Lions ????
What about the Fitzroy clubs outstanding debt they owe the Brisbane Lions.Remember it was the Fitzroy club that owed all those millions.They were articled for bankruptcy .
In good faith I remember reading that the Brisbane club is not persuing that debt.
Fot the life of me I can't see why they are allowed to trade under that name.
Seem to be a lot of troublemakers.Aren't some of their board members from 1996 still on the board of the new Fitzroy club.
 
Roylion, as you seem to be someone in the know about the inner and outer workings of the merger agreement, I was wondering about your thoughts on the following.

The actual legal option for Fitzroy to field a stand alone team.....

Surely they couldn't call them the "Fitzroy Lions"?
In most buy-out's, liquidations,sales etc of businesses, there seems to be a 'non competition' clause of something of the like. In this case that would mean that the current legal entity of Fitzroy FC that is still around, would not be able to field a football team using that name. And possibly, depending on the terms, not be able to field a team at all -even tho it would not be in direct competition to the Brisbane Lions, it would still be 'football', as opposed to them starting a business and calling it Fitzroy Lions Paper, and them making envelopes or something as equally non-football related.


The wearing of the Jumper would then become another issue with any aligned football team they may become part of. I believe that the Brisbane Lions gave permission for Coburg-Fitzroy to wear the Fitzroy jumper last year. There is definately no guarantee that they will do that again, and I suppose that once again puts it on the Brisbane Lions to decide what more to give back to the Fitzroy community, even if it is not in their (Brisbane Lions) own best interest (ie something they would not benefit directly from).

Originally posted by Slore:

Fitzroy should do everything in its power to keep a separate identity going, in fact a stand-alone identity. I have no faith in ANY alliance with anyone after what has happened with Coburg. At least if we solely concentrated on the Reds we would be masters of our own destiny once again.

If Fitzroy can not field a team, are not not entitled to use the Fitzroy Lions name, and not the owners of their jumper anymore, do they have a stand-alone identity?

Thoughts?
 
Originally posted by Carl:
I can't see why the old Fitzroy supporters don't get behind the Brisbane Lions.You get to see your team live on TV every second week and see them in melbourne most of the other weeks.Why you would follow Fitzroy in some other crappy league is a mystery to me.Fitzroy is gone,not even Coburg wanted you.

Some Fitzroy fans do support Brisbane, but probably 65% don't. The reason I'll follow Fitzroy no matter what 'crappy' league we're in is because I have always followed the Fitzroy FC. I do not follow the AFL, without Fitzroy the AFL mean bugger all to me. If you follow the league instead of your club, thats your choice, but do not try to impose what you think on us. And Coburg did want us, they tried to get us in the Richmond deal, but they were speaking from a position of weakness and were in no place to dictate to Richmond.
 
Originally posted by greeny:
Why is the Fitzroy Football club still trading. I thought they went bankrupt.
Why are they trying to become a VFL team again.Trying to undermine the Brisbane Lions ????
What about the Fitzroy clubs outstanding debt they owe the Brisbane Lions.Remember it was the Fitzroy club that owed all those millions.They were articled for bankruptcy .
In good faith I remember reading that the Brisbane club is not persuing that debt.
Fot the life of me I can't see why they are allowed to trade under that name.
Seem to be a lot of troublemakers.Aren't some of their board members from 1996 still on the board of the new Fitzroy club.


Fitzroy never were liquidated. The Fitzroy FC that exists now is exactly the same one that has always existed. We went into administration and our playing operations were merged with the Brisbane Bears. The club itself came out of administration in late 97 I think. The club held a meeting to ask the members what to do with what existed of the club and it was decided that we should continue as a club. We are not trying to undermine the Brisbane Lions, how could we? What on earth could Fitzroy do to hurt Brisbane.....

Brisbane herself is not claiming the debt back, and has indicated it never will. She could claim it, and kill of Fitzroy once and for all, but Brisbane knows if they did that it would be the absolute end of any chance they had of winning over the majority of Fitzroy fans to support Brisbane as well as whatever league Fitzroy ends up with. Brisbane won't do it, and very wisely too. And how are we Fitzroy Loyalists trouble makers? We want to keep our club alive, thats all. Personally although I have nothing to do with Brisbane I certainly don't ridicule those who do.

And yes, the board of directors is basically the same, because it is the same club...not a new one. All that happened was that we lost our AFL licence, playing operations etc. The club itself lives on.......it still has over 1000 members apparently.
 
The wearing of the Jumper would then become another issue with any aligned football team they may become part of. I believe that the Brisbane Lions gave permission for Coburg-Fitzroy to wear the Fitzroy jumper last year. There is definately no guarantee that they will do that again, and I suppose that once again puts it on the Brisbane Lions to decide what more to give back to the Fitzroy community, even if it is not in their (Brisbane Lions) own best interest (ie something they would not benefit directly from).

Not really a problem....The Fitzroy FC are still the legal owners of the FFC logo that was on the front of the old guernseys. We could simply place that logo on a red and/or blue strip. I hardly see what Brisbane can do...

I have to ask having read a few Fitzroy threads here......

Why do some Brisbane fans consider Fitzroy's continuing existence a threat to them? It seems to me that Brisbane are a much bigger threat to our future than we could ever be to yours....
 
My apologies for not responding to your post at the Brisbane board, Roylion. I am interested in the topic, and I like both options, however, I agree with Slore, if Brisbane got in financial strife, there may be no guarantee that a 'Fitzroy' entity would survive, but that's just speculation.

I would support Fitzroy in any capacity, in any league. I was going to join Coburg-Fitzroy this season (last year I was in no financial position to join any club) but as we all know, that's no longer an option. That's my thoughts on the subject.
smile.gif


This topic is a perfect example of why we should have a Fitzroy board, so it won't get lost amongst other threads. 6 people emailed Bluey.........guess we need more huh.

------------------
*the one and only lioness*
 
If they are still the owners of the logo etc - why did they have to ask permission of the Brissy Lions to wear the old strip? I don't understand?

Originally posted by Slore:

Fitzroy never were liquidated. The Fitzroy FC that exists now is exactly the same one that has always existed. We went into administration and our playing operations were merged with the Brisbane Bears. The club itself came out of administration in late 97 I think. The club held a meeting to ask the members what to do with what existed of the club and it was decided that we should continue as a club. We are not trying to undermine the Brisbane Lions, how could we? What on earth could Fitzroy do to hurt Brisbane.....

Brisbane herself is not claiming the debt back, and has indicated it never will. She could claim it, and kill of Fitzroy once and for all, but Brisbane knows if they did that it would be the absolute end of any chance they had of winning over the majority of Fitzroy fans to support Brisbane as well as whatever league Fitzroy ends up with. Brisbane won't do it, and very wisely too. And how are we Fitzroy Loyalists trouble makers? We want to keep our club alive, thats all. Personally although I have nothing to do with Brisbane I certainly don't ridicule those who do.

And yes, the board of directors is basically the same, because it is the same club...not a new one. All that happened was that we lost our AFL licence, playing operations etc. The club itself lives on.......it still has over 1000 members apparently.

My understanding is not that Brisbane will never pursue that debt - but that the reason they haven't pursued the debt is due to 'good faith' - ie 'not to kick someone when they are down' - the financial situation of the legal entity of the current FFC. If the pokie venture had gone ahead, and started making the bucks - could you realisticly see the Brissy Lions sitting back and saying "let em have their money"? Especially after their undertaking to pay certain debts out of the merger money from the AFL, ended up costing them alot more than was orignally admitted to (as in the amount of $$ it would take to clear certain debts)??


And as one of the financial members of the '1000' members of the FFC, I do want to know, has it ever occured to you, or your fellow members, to ask that that membership money be used to repay some of that extra debt? to clear the slate, as it may be? to put yourselves in a position where you don't owe anyone?

If not, why not?

These are genuine questions, I am not having a go at 'Fitzroy'.




[This message has been edited by Danni (edited 12 February 2001).]
 
Sorry - I forgot a question in that:

If they are not 'allowed' to wear the jumper, or a combination of the colours and logo (which could be highly likely if that sort of clause was included) and they are not allowed to call themselves the 'Fitzroy Lions', what is it that would be the 'stand alone identity' of them being the Fitzroy that you all remember?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What determines if the club exists? Nickname....the name Lions is superflous to me and I suspect many fans, especially old time; actually the name is relatively recent in Fitzroy Histroy dating only from the late 1950's. In fact after we turned to the Lions we became rubbish!! The only name that matters is Fitzroy, fullstop.

As to the strip, I'm not sure but I'd suspect Brisbane has the rights to the design but the FFC logo is Fitzroy's alone, in fact if Brisbane used it they'd be in trouble I'd suspect :-)

As to paying our membership money, why not use the Brisbane Lions Melbourne Membership for that, or indeed the proceeds from the Manningham........after all we're part of the same family aren't we? (Well thats what we are told ad nauseam by some) Brisbane knew EXACTLY what they were getting when they merged, if you inherited unknown crippling debts like we did with Coburg then gripe about it I'd say.

As long as Fitzroy Football Club exists, as it has always existed, I don't really care about the little things. And I don't hate Brisbane at all, I've been to a few of their Melbourne games, but I'm too loyal to the Fitzroy club for my own good I suspect.
 
BTW if Brisbane did kill off the Fitzroy FC, fine. But eventually some of us would probably reform, name a club Fitzroy Social Club FC (which Brisbane cannot touch) or something, maybe even the Reds would keep the name Fitzroy, and play in social leagues. We're a hardy bunch, look at what has been thrown at us, and certain Brisbane fans still seem to fear us. (God knows why.....)

Conversely the Brisbane Lions would destroy their Melbourne Membership hopes forever. They'd probably lose a few current Melbourne members and the propaganda value to the anti-Brisbane faction would be absolutely enormous. Imagine how they could exploit it....."See how much Brisbane love the Fitzroy connection, they destroyed the club entirely for the sake of a unpayable debt. They couldn't even leave us the littlest part of our club, and If they are for us imagine if they were against us, etc etc etc"...... How much money could Brisbane potentially lose in the long term if they killed Fitzroy for the sake of a few million dollars we could never pay? We really have nothing to lose, but Brisbane does. Thats why they'll never touch us. But don't get me wrong, if Fitzroy got into the money someday of course we should pay the debt off........
 
Slore - what planet are you from???

Can you please now go back and answer my genuine questions? not just rehash your propoganda??
 
How about I give you a template - to try and help me understand....which is why I asked the questions in the first place! :

1)The logo/ jumper jumper - here is the legal position of that as far as I am aware.......

2) I am/am-not aware of the extra debts that were undisclosed or not correctly reported at the time of the merger. The Brisbane Lions payed the extra money rather than cause extra insolvency problems for FFC, this did also benefit the Brisbane Lions (ie they were then able to trade under the merger conditions that they paid all the debts nominated in the merger agreement)....this is my position on what should happen with that extra debt should the legal entity of the FFC become financial viable (including our membership money).....

3)The one major thing that has been repeated time and again is that the Fitzroy community would only associate the name Lions with 'Fitzroy' and more times than not - the issue of wearing of the Fitzroy jumper - that would then give them back something that they have 'lost'. This is how the wearing or not legally being able to wear the jumper would help/perpetuate/affect the support of the identity of a club called 'Fitzroy' in another league....
 
And as for 'getting the debt repayed out of the manningham or the melbourne membership money' - what a crock - this is one time where I do now lose my cool - Ask the ppl who are now dedicated to the new club to repay the debts of the old?? The ppl that poured their money into the old - only to see them fold (as such)???

As you would have seen my comments stated that HAD the pokie venture gone ahead, and then HAD that same venture MADE THE BUCKS, that the extra debt would have been a topic to have been raised. I never at any time suggested that the Brisbane Lions go out now and bury what is left of Fitzroy.......

For crying out loud - you claim that Brisbane supporters FEAR Fitzroy......yet you at the same time - get defensive and won't help the rest of us learn or understand the feelings and thoughts of the 'other camp'......

You can't have it both ways......

You want us to understand and appreciate and acknowledge?? Then give us the info so we can.

[This message has been edited by Danni (edited 12 February 2001).]
 
Originally posted by Danni:
1)The logo/ jumper jumper - here is the legal position of that as far as I am aware.......

Can you read.....Guernsey...don't know
FFC logo is ours. Full Stop. Finit...get it?

2) I am/am-not aware of the extra debts that were undisclosed or not correctly reported at the time of the merger. The Brisbane Lions payed the extra money rather than cause extra insolvency problems for FFC, this did also benefit the Brisbane Lions (ie they were then able to trade under the merger conditions that they paid all the debts nominated in the merger agreement)....this is my position on what should happen with that extra debt should the legal entity of the FFC become financial viable (including our membership money).....

Pay it back, but not until we can.....again did I not state this.

3)The one major thing that has been repeated time and again is that the Fitzroy community would only associate the name Lions with 'Fitzroy' and more times than not - the issue of wearing of the Fitzroy jumper - that would then give them back something that they have 'lost'. This is how the wearing or not legally being able to wear the jumper would help/perpetuate/affect the support of the identity of a club called 'Fitzroy' in another league....

No...again read my comment instead of calling it propaganda. The name Fitzroy is the most important..why do you think so many fans preferred a North merger, the name Fitzroy was going to be included...

and the FFC logo is ours.....you have no rights to it therefore I consider the wearing of the old Fitzroy strip by Brisbane a dead issue
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by Danni:
And as for 'getting the debt repayed out of the manningham or the melbourne membership money' - what a crock -

of course it is...heard of irony? Fitzroy fans are famous for it.

this is one time where I do now lose my cool - Ask the ppl who are now dedicated to the new club to repay the debts of the old?? The ppl that poured their money into the old - only to see them fold (as such)???

re: above. Of course Brisbane shouldn't pay the debt, but then again we shouldn't pay our $15.00 per annum to give to you.

As you would have seen my comments stated that HAD the pokie venture gone ahead, and then HAD that same venture MADE THE BUCKS, that the extra debt would have been a topic to have been raised. I never at any time suggested that the Brisbane Lions go out now and bury what is left of Fitzroy.......

And I was stating the reasons why they wouldn't regardless.

For crying out loud - you claim that Brisbane supporters FEAR Fitzroy......

You do. Why on earth does a Brisbane based Lions fan have any concern on what goes on in Melbourne Amateur Football. It has nothing to do with you. Get this through your heard...Brisbane are not Fitzroy. You do not own us, you are not our lords and masters and your club should only concern itself with Brisbane. Stay out of Fitzroy FC affairs. You even lobby for not allowing us a Fitzroy board here? Why..........

yet you at the same time - get defensive and won't help the rest of us learn or understand the feelings and thoughts of the 'other camp'......

You have no interest in what Fitzroy FC loyalists think. You even referred to Fitzroy in 'quotes' did you not, implying that we are somehow not Fitzroy.

You can't have it both ways......

Lost you now........

You want us to understand and appreciate and acknowledge?? Then give us the info so we can.

No....want non-Fitzroy fans to mind their own affairs and clubs and stay out of ours. Again certain Brisbane fans seem to think they have a god-given right to put their noses into Fitzroys affairs because in 1996 we were forced to merge our playing operations with you. And you keep saying regarding the merger "Get Over it" do you not? Well, we're bloody well trying but others seem intent on having their agendas heard when they are not requested or wanted.
 
Slore - I am asking you to back up those statements of yours with evidendence....so that I can understand where you are coming from....Why are you so objective to that situation?

The ownership of the logo - can you please tell me where that is stipulated? my original post was to roylion, who I thought might know - but you have taken it upon yourself to answer that one - so can you please tell me where the ownership of that logo is stipulated.

If the logo IS owned by FFC - why is the GUERNSEY of the last FFC not owned by the current FFC legal entity (as you would assume it may be) or if it is why do they need to ask permission from the BL to use it? And as for the wearing of it by the BL being a dead issue - I have never suggested that they should - so why was it ever alive in your mind anyway?

A 'north' merger including the name Fitzroy?? To be honest that is the first time I have ever heard that.....

btw I do take it hat you are aware that the Brisbane Lions is only a name used to describe the team? The Club's actual name is Brisbane Bears-Fitzroy Football Club.

Why are you being so defensive to my questions? Do you want me to believe that Fitzroy supporters are all unreasonable? Cause you ain't succeeding in that - I have the fortunance of knowing a few - and they are great and reasonable ppl - we may not agree 100% all the time - but we also ALL take the time to understand where the other is coming from.
 
Slore I do have a right to understand/learn and appreciate Fitzroy History.....it is part of the History of my CLUB......whether you like it - or more than obviously - don't like it........

You seem to be one that will never understand let alone acknowledge what it was like for us as Bears supporters to lose our team/club/history (however breif it was) too.......you are all too consumed in your own pain/ego/want/obsession to be human enough to recognise what went on for the rest of us....

I am making the best of it, and part of that is learning of our 'parentage' as such....if you don't like that....to friggin bad.....it ain't sticking my nose in.....it is part of who my club now are....therefore part of my business as a supporter/member/barracker for my club...

And yes - it is ppl like you making such abject comments that have certainly dissuaded me from endorsing a Fitzroy board on this site....

Olmy - can I being to use my "I told you so" now?........please???

[This message has been edited by Danni (edited 12 February 2001).]
 
look, you started on the offensive against me first...I only answered the questions and then you came out on the attack. Of course I will retaliate. I'm not going to sit back as you claim I'm on another planet.

FFC Logo: Owned by Fitzroy FC. Well known fact, ask the Club. Read the 'Roy Boy' magazine from a few years ago and it was on the FSG site. As for the strip, I have no idea as I have said. Did I not state that I assume that the Lions have rights to the colours and design.

As to North Melbourne the club was due to be named North Melbourne-Fitzroy or North-Fitzroy. And I know the Lions are called Brisbane Bears-Fitzroy FC Ltd. If they played under that name it might be different for some (Brisbane-Fitzroy), but they don't so.......The fact is that Fitzroy FC still exists, the same ACN number, the same club. Brisbane Bears-Fitzroy is not the same. that clinches it for me. Sorry if you cannot handle it, I have no problems with the Brisbane Lions separate existence, why do you have one with ours?

If you want to celebrate the Lions Fitzroy heritage, fantastic, that is what will get Fitzroy fans interested in Brisbane, but I perceived you as being completely anti-Fitzroy, if I'm wrong I'm sorry. But it is certainly how it appeared to me.

And please don't 'state the told you so'...you cannot antagonise a differing point of view and them claim victimisation when they retaliate using exactly the same methods you did. Six of one.......
 
and of course I know that it was hard for Bears fans to accept the new club, and I sympathise, but I'm not a Bears fan so i wouldn't get involved in that debate. Have I ever stated anything anti-Brisbane, or just pro-Fitzroy? Why do we have to rehash this every year? Can't we just let live, thats all we want on this side of the fence. And you have me all wrong BTW....I'm not obsessed or egotistical. I just love the club I've always followed and will always follow.

Can I state this again; I really don't care what occurs within the Brisbane Lions. It's not hatred, it's not antagonism, its simply indifference. As I don't care about Richmond, Carlton and Collingwood.

But unfortunately being solely concerned with Fitzroy gets you labelled with some traits........
 
What is your problem Slore? What is this offensive crapolla? I have stated the whole way thru that these were genuine questions!

How can I be anti Fitzroy when I am stiving to learn more about them???

Who ever said that I have a problem with the existance of the Fitzroy Football Club (with or without the same ACN as they had prior to the merger)?

I am also not aware that it is a 'well known fact' or able to read copies of 'Roy Boy' from 'years ago' or even being in the know of the address off the top of my head or in my browser of the FSG - which I take it means 'Fitzroy Supporters Group'.

How easy would it have been for you to elaborate on the above earlier? Instead of presume that I was on the attack?

I still am not aware that it is common knowledge except for you saying so, or have a copy of the Roy Boy, or have the addy of the FSG in my possession, so how am I to have that info as 'common knowledge', if ppl such as yourself are unwilling to impart that knowledge to those of us that seek it? And also - where do we go to find if that 'common knowledge' is correct knowledge?

Why is this so hard for you to understand?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom