Where's the AFL show for fans with an IQ above 80?

GordonStrangler

Debutant
Apr 25, 2013
52
204
AFL Club
Richmond
There is a GIGANTIC gap that is wide open for Foxtel or the networks to fill. Footy media is 10 years behind the coaches and strategies.

Outside of game day coverage, we get served two types of AFL shows: (happy to add to lists in 1 & 2 if I've missed some).

1. Chuckling Morons - boofy ex-players, sad comedians, token women. Chortling and overacting. There's a big market for this stuff.
......Bounce, Up The Guts, Footy Show (RIP) The Front Bar, Beep Test, Marngrook Footy Show, Sunday Footy Show.

2. Talkfests - ex-players and journo's look serious, superficial analysis, random stats, gossip, AFL Atrocity of The Week.
......AFL 360, Footy Classified, On The Couch, Talking Footy, On The Mark, Weekend Lowdown.

Serious Analysis - what coaches like Clarkson and assistants like Blake Caracella focus on. Deep breakdowns of teams, oppo, and game plans.
Well beyond the usual trivia of disposals, i50's, stoppages, etc. (Most data on TV shows has little correlation to wins. It's fairy floss).
It's not (for example) "On The Couch's 'couch gems', a 1 min segment with random AFL stats. Or that David King used CD stats on 360.

The analysis is analytical and structured. It tells you in depth why teams win, lose, game styles, which players are executing it, or not.

This is what AFL teams do every week. Where is this on TV? Nowhere.

Yes this could be a boring show unless handled well. Yes this will not appeal to many AFL fans. Yes it will require a brave programming exec.

We have 15+ AFL TV shows. We have fully catered to the needs of stupid people and those who prefer empty but lengthy discussions.

Someone smart and brave in TV Land should see the gap. Fill it with a show focused on serious AFL analysis.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Elite Master

Norm Smith Medallist
May 20, 2011
9,930
7,145
AFL Club
North Melbourne
AFL Insider was very analytical with in depth discussion and information breaking down all parts of the game but it only lasted a couple of years before being axed. The networks know that 85% of football fans are bogans and/or simpletons, the programming reflects that.
 

equiv_clearly

Club Legend
Apr 30, 2013
1,426
2,577
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Canucks, South Fremantle
AFL Insider was very analytical with in depth discussion and information breaking down all parts of the game but it only lasted a couple of years before being axed. The networks know that 85% of football fans are bogans and/or simpletons, the programming reflects that.
Is that even true though? We've got an entire generation of football fans playing fantasy, knowing more players and stats than ever before. I think we're just damned by low expectations.

All they need to do is put a smart ex-footballer (difficult), a journalist with a footy brain and a comedian who can vacillate from smart football chat to cracking the occasional joke, someone like Adam Rozenbachs. And perhaps an ex-assistant coach or analyst.

On the couch isn't terrible, but it misses Mike Sheehan. Journalists are relegated to 'newssssssbreaker' or stuck trying to be one of the boys. A Marc McGowan, Travis King or even a Mark Duffield would help immensely. They don't cower or pander to ex-players and provide insight.
 

GordonStrangler

Debutant
Apr 25, 2013
52
204
AFL Club
Richmond
Podcasts my good man. Trends (the Marc McGowan one from AFL.com) is a ripper.
Like 'em, but podcasts aren't good for presentation of serious analysis.

TV is vastly better. Video of game situations and player actions, tracking of players, game video and the behind-the goal-cameras.
Also showing and discussing stats for players and teams, with graphs and visuals. Plus diagrams of set plays and strategies.

Something about a picture and 1000 words.
 

Adelaide Hawk

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2002
46,090
34,917
Adelaide
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Norwood
AFL Insider was very analytical with in depth discussion and information breaking down all parts of the game but it only lasted a couple of years before being axed. The networks know that 85% of football fans are bogans and/or simpletons, the programming reflects that.
Got it in one. I've stopped watching all football shows because they just drove me up the wall. I realised there must be a market for these types of show, but they weren't for me. Unfortunately, people who really want to think about the game are in a very small minority. It's not just football, most things are marketed towards people who prefer not to think. That's life.
 

StillAtLarge

Norm Smith Medallist
May 12, 2015
5,078
10,181
AFL Club
Hawthorn
5 things I learnt:
Hamish is a campaigner
Hamish is a campaigner
Hamish is a campaigner
Hamish is a campaigner
Hamish is a campaigner
 

GordonStrangler

Debutant
Apr 25, 2013
52
204
AFL Club
Richmond
Foxtel is in financial difficulties and will be cutting back. Losing $400m a year will leave a bruise.

My suggestion
....(a) do the Serious Analysis Show (see first post). If it costs a ton of money then you're doing it wrong.
....(b) save money by cutting back on the number of commentators. By a lot.

Apparently AFL games need up to ten commentators and analysts all pontificating on what just happened.
Friday night coverage is ridiculously top heavy. 4 at the ground and another 6 back in the studio. Maybe more. It's hard to keep count

I'm not sure who thinks this yackfest-a-rama adds value. More=better is not the formula that works.

Re-deploy some of these geniuses and money to the Serious Analysis Show. Be smarter about using money and talent, not just cuts.

edit
To predict the complaint :
"Serious analysis? WTF? Most of us at Foxtel have no idea about these new fangled game plans, stats, oppo analysis". Exactly]
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Bomberboyokay

Brownlow Medallist
Sep 27, 2014
26,532
23,118
The Temple, Boyle Heights
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Roosters, Mets
The networks know that 85% of football fans are bogans and/or simpletons, the programming reflects that.
The networks have gotten away with lazy stuff so long they don't put any effort in. America and England are full of stupid people too but their football shows don't avoid strategic stuff.
 

GordonStrangler

Debutant
Apr 25, 2013
52
204
AFL Club
Richmond
^^ Great point, especially about lazy networks.

NFL broadcasts cover each game with just 3 people. 2 guys up top (play-by-play and an analyst) and 1 on the sideline for injuries/interviews.
Obviously it's a different game with more actual playing time, but to describe an AFL game apparently needs double

NFL networks take the strategy stuff seriously. In-game analysis is vastly superior to the AFL with guys like Chris Collinsworth giving excellent insights that really add to the broadcast and fan enjoyment. They also do strategy and analysis well, usually in a separate program or segment.
 

wagstaff

Premiership Player
Nov 28, 2001
4,877
2,459
The Sea of Holes
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Melbourne Stars, Arsenal
Foxtel is in financial difficulties and will be cutting back. Losing $400m a year will leave a bruise.

My suggestion
....(a) do the Serious Analysis Show (see first post). If it costs a ton of money then you're doing it wrong.
....(b) save money by cutting back on the number of commentators. By a lot.

Apparently AFL games need up to ten commentators and analysts all pontificating on what just happened.
Friday night coverage is ridiculously top heavy. 4 at the ground and another 6 back in the studio. Maybe more. It's hard to keep count

I'm not sure who thinks this yackfest-a-rama adds value. More=better is not the formula that works.

Re-deploy some of these geniuses and money to the Serious Analysis Show. Be smarter about using money and talent, not just cuts.

edit
To predict the complaint :
"Serious analysis? WTF? Most of us at Foxtel have no idea about these new fangled game plans, stats, oppo analysis". Exactly]
Yeah, agree on the trend of Fox Footy's coverage. It feels just overstuffed with too many people who only get half a minute to say anything, especially when they waste time with self-indulgent nonsense like which pundit got their predictions right. That's one of the reasons why I watch their post-match much less than I used to.
 

Consolaçao

Team Captain
May 22, 2007
590
220
Melbourne Town
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Phnom Penh Utd (curling)
Five minutes out from the start of the WC/ dees game last week, viewers were shown iPhone footage of some eagles players who had been momentarily trapped in an elevator earlier that week. Viewers sat there as commentators carried on a lengthy discussion which players they would AND wouldn’t like to be trapped in a lift with, replete with on-screen graphics. With ex-footballers known for their wit, it was obviously very funny.
Meanwhile, the prelim final replay was about to start, Melbourne playing for their season, WC struggling to find form. But let’s talk about elevators.
 

Minka Beaver

All Australian
Feb 5, 2004
966
1,431
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Everton
A show with proper analysis would be fascinating for footy heads, but it's also a marginal interest for either the commercial stations or Foxtel. When you're losing money hand over fist, giving up evening TV slots to people discussing game trends and analysis is not going to cut it. (What they'd probably like to do is produce more documentaries and specials, but they're limited by poor access to the clubs).

The second biggest barrier is that clubs don't want the game covered in depth - there's a trend across the sport to protect game plans like they are Pentagon secrets, rather than being mostly derivatives of the previous premier's tactics.

But a solution is to provide a webcast, which can be streamed, promoted etc through the AFL's website and digital channels. That would work, as an analysis show must be visual and would use accredited journos (such as Marc McGowan) already working on this topic. Give it the AFL imprimatur and have a current player (Jack Riewoldt for example would be perfect) and an aspiring assistant join him. And make it brief - it's a complex and dry subject matter, so leave viewers with one key point to understand each episode.
 

Lockyer24

Brownlow Medallist
Jul 3, 2001
20,757
5,968
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Heat, Victory, Man Utd, Redskins
They should look at the Premier league media currently offered under Optus sport.
Daily shoes with analysis, previews, reviews etc
All on demand

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
 

mouncey2franklin

Club Legend
Jun 16, 2018
1,760
2,685
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Commercial operators have to appeal to a wide audience base which means lowest common denominator stuff.

Then factor in:

i) Australia is a relatively small country population wise, and of that population, only about half are likely to take any interest in AFL.

ii) Australians are typically not interested in deep analysis of anything, let alone sportsball.

Which means that there is practically zero market for niche material i.e. deep analysis of AFL.

Just the way it is, sadly.

Look at this forum. Bigfooty is the largest AFL forum on the internet today and just look at it.

Detailed analytical OPs on the Main Board are (generally) lucky to receive 50 replies, and of those, most are effectively 'nah you're wrong'.

Idiocracy, my man.

 
Last edited:

HTPunter

Premiership Player
Sep 27, 2014
4,642
5,205
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Football analysis isn't helped by the commentary on game day. There are up to 5 or even 6 commentators per game (including a boundary rider), which means outside of the 2 main callers, there is 4 others who don't have much to add except quick stats. "He has had 15 touches", "he has taken 4 marks" and then maybe 1 quick drawing on a still to demonstrate a lead or a block, which lasts 10 seconds max. Too many talking heads.

Commentary would be ideal with 1 main caller, being a genuine commentator/journalist, 1 ex-footballer attempting to provide the special comments/analysis, and a boundary rider trying to keep track of things on-ground (injury updates etc).
 

Moggy

Premiership Player
Sep 7, 2012
3,187
4,917
Oslo
AFL Club
Geelong
5 things I learnt:
Hamish is a campaigner
Hamish is a campaigner
Hamish is a campaigner
Hamish is a campaigner
Hamish is a campaigner
At least he made it to where he is under his own steam...

Baaaahaaahaaahaa heehee 🤣
 
Top Bottom