Which Footy Club Leads the Way in Social Issues?

Which Footy Club Leads The Way in Social Issues?

  • Adelaide

    Votes: 3 1.5%
  • Brisbane

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • Carlton

    Votes: 5 2.5%
  • Collingwood

    Votes: 9 4.6%
  • Essendon

    Votes: 10 5.1%
  • Fremantle

    Votes: 4 2.0%
  • Geelong

    Votes: 8 4.1%
  • Gold Coast

    Votes: 5 2.5%
  • GWS

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • Hawthorn

    Votes: 9 4.6%
  • Melbourne

    Votes: 3 1.5%
  • North Melbourne

    Votes: 57 28.9%
  • Port

    Votes: 11 5.6%
  • Richmond

    Votes: 16 8.1%
  • St Kilda

    Votes: 16 8.1%
  • Sydney Swans

    Votes: 12 6.1%
  • West Coast

    Votes: 14 7.1%
  • Western Bulldogs

    Votes: 11 5.6%

  • Total voters
    197

Remove this Banner Ad

Since when is tackling a drug epidemic infesting the senior players at the club 'political correctness'?

Sheesh.

I'd happily trade the 2006 premiership cup back to AFL headquarters personally if it brought Chris Mainwaring back and kept Ben Cousins on the straight and narrow post-AFL.

That term is used way too much by right wing elements longing for a return to the days when you could say whatever bigoted s**t you wanted without recrimination and minority groups knew their place.

go off king :clapping::clapping::clapping:
 
I think WCE lead the way here.
Our players spend more time/hours working on community projects giving of themselves than any other club.
We have donated my more money and time to charities in the last ten years than any other club
Apart from below established charities every player on the list as there own they look after individually

 

Log in to remove this ad.

I might be breaking some news here, but it's my understanding that the Collingwood Football Club has spent the last 12 months developing their own bank. Pretty soon there'll be a Bank of Collingwood. Apparently Eddie was sick and tired of watching players and fans alike, squandering their earnings. The bank will offer only one account, and it's called the Tooth Fairy account. Named after the Tooth Fairy because that's where most Collingwood fans get their income. They can deposit their Tooth Fairy money at the Bank of Collingwood, and rest assured it will be managed with care. I found the building plans. It'll look something like this:

1549096948432.png


Not footy related, but Mr. Weir has done a lot for animal rights. For so long horses have thought 'I'd much rather run on a tread mill than out in the field.' And god damn if Mr. Weir didn't head straight out to Treadmills R Us, and grab the biggest one he could find. Now horses don't have to run around outdoors anymore. He even put TV's in front of them while they work out. Reruns of Mr. Ed, The Black Stallion, and Seabiscuit. Probably reruns of the Melbourne cup too, but with a few minutes edited out - the bit where they put a bullet in The Cliffsofmoher. The jigger wasn't a jigger at all, it's a prototype stable door opener, so the horses can let themselves in and out as they please. As for the nails, he's just giving the horses a lesson in construction, teaching them how to build their own stable. Case closed. Like the rest of us, the horses will tire of their treadmill, get themselves a dog, maybe a greyhound rescue, and walk the local streets instead of walking indoors in front of the idiot box.
 
That approach almost destroyed West Coast post 2006, though.
WC has won more premierships since 2005 than 11 clubs combined.
There's a difference between letting your players smoke glass pipes on weekends an becoming a club with political affiliation
 
Since when is tackling a drug epidemic infesting the senior players at the club 'political correctness'?

Sheesh.

I'd happily trade the 2006 premiership cup back to AFL headquarters personally if it brought Chris Mainwaring back and kept Ben Cousins on the straight and narrow post-AFL.

That term is used way too much by right wing elements longing for a return to the days when you could say whatever bigoted s**t you wanted without recrimination and minority groups knew their place.

What absoloute garbage. They are ******* footy clubs. They are organisations who's only purpose is to win games of footy, if you wanna get involved in political s**t go to march out front of parliament house.

People are sick to death of constantly being told how to act and think by whatever issue social media is pushing at the time
 
Remember, for all their virtue signalling, the only reason North doesn't have pokies is they had to sell them to pay their debts. They had no choice.
The spin about how socially conscious they were only came a few years after the sale (and after roobet had also failed).
Some what true.
However like all clubs, north needed to invest in something , they had choices including pokies. They went down the path of the Huddle instead of pokies

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 
Some what true.
However like all clubs, north needed to invest in something , they had choices including pokies. They went down the path of the Huddle instead of pokies

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

I know North's history of investments might confuse you on this, but most clubs, when they invest, do so to MAKE money, so I'm not sure the huddle qualifies....but hey, if you want to pretend that matters, Richmond 'invests' in the Korin Gamadji Institute too...Indeed, I'm sure you'll find most clubs have a community program of some sort that they like to make a lot of PR out of.
 
What absoloute garbage. They are ******* footy clubs. They are organisations who's only purpose is to win games of footy, if you wanna get involved in political s**t go to march out front of parliament house.

People are sick to death of constantly being told how to act and think by whatever issue social media is pushing at the time

And I think it's absolute garbage that a sporting organisation is only set up to win games, and I am glad that none of the AFL clubs (or most other professional sporting organisations, for that matter) don't agree with your premise.
 
And I think it's absolute garbage that a sporting organisation is only set up to win games, and I am glad that none of the AFL clubs (or most other professional sporting organisations, for that matter) don't agree with your premise.


You mean, have been browbeaten by the handwringing whingers into making some PR noises without ever doing anything significant (unless there is something in it for them).
 
And I think it's absolute garbage that a sporting organisation is only set up to win games, and I am glad that none of the AFL clubs (or most other professional sporting organisations, for that matter) don't agree with your premise.
That's because agendas are now being forced on people even when they don't want to hear about them. There's political messages being constantly pushed when sport is supposed to be neutral.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I know North's history of investments might confuse you on this, but most clubs, when they invest, do so to MAKE money, so I'm not sure the huddle qualifies....but hey, if you want to pretend that matters, Richmond 'invests' in the Korin Gamadji Institute too...Indeed, I'm sure you'll find most clubs have a community program of some sort that they like to make a lot of PR out of.
It doesn't confuse me at all.
I once tried to book an overseas flight through a nmfc travel agency back in the 90s.
The point is back in 2009 when north rallied to save itself from relocation the question was what direction do they take moving forward to generate revenue.
Pokies was an option hotly debated moving forward.
The board at the time decided against it.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 
You mean, have been browbeaten by the handwringing whingers into making some PR noises without ever doing anything significant (unless there is something in it for them).

Perhaps, and I understand the cynicism completely, but taking a position of social responsibility is something I agree with. Yes, there is $$$ in it for them but they are a business, too.

That's because agendas are now being forced on people even when they don't want to hear about them. There's political messages being constantly pushed when sport is supposed to be neutral.

Bullshit. You can believe that sport is 'supposed' to be neutral but sport has never been neutral and always been used to push barrows. Once money gets involved as well the whole idea of neutrality gets corrupted - rightly or wrongly. If you want pure sport with no 'agendas' you need to get down to your local football oval or cricket pitch.
 
It doesn't confuse me at all.
I once tried to book an overseas flight through a nmfc travel agency back in the 90s.
The point is back in 2009 when north rallied to save itself from relocation the question was what direction do they take moving forward to generate revenue.
Pokies was an option hotly debated moving forward.
The board at the time decided against it.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

They acknowledged they couldn't afford it and tried to spin it to look good.
 
They acknowledged they couldn't afford it and tried to spin it to look good.
This is where you have no idea.
Yes they sold up a few machines that were losing money at Etihad stadium, remnants from kanga casino at Arden st.which were sold out. This was prior to 2008.
Post 2009
Pokies was a business model discussed at board level as means to be sustainable in Victoria.
They rejected that and looked to generate revenue through other means

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 
This is where you have no idea.
Yes they sold up a few machines that were losing money at Etihad stadium, remnants from kanga casino at Arden st.which were sold out. This was prior to 2008.
Post 2009
Pokies was a business model discussed at board level as means to be sustainable in Victoria.
They rejected that and looked to generate revenue through other means

You just said exactly what telsor said.....i.e they tried pokies, they were a commercial failure so they moved on to something else. They only "rejected" them after they couldn't make any money from them.

It's great they don't have pokies, but let's not pretend they wouldn't have them if they were pulling in a million bucks a year.
 
You just said exactly what telsor said.....i.e they tried pokies, they were a commercial failure so they moved on to something else. They only "rejected" them after they couldn't make any money from them.

It's great they don't have pokies, but let's not pretend they wouldn't have them if they were pulling in a million bucks a year.
FMD

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 
Imagine openly melting on an online forum because no one agrees that your club was more socially conscious than North Melbourne haha
 
Lol North and the mythical no pokies/social responsibility angle.

Sold them to reduce debt, still ran RooBet for years afterwards.
 
Lol North and the mythical no pokies/social responsibility angle.

Sold them to reduce debt, still ran RooBet for years afterwards.
What's the history on roobet? To be honest I never paid attention to that side of football until my adult years and I can't find any info on it anywhere.
 
Imagine people thinking that a football club, which has traditionally been an organisation in touch with the local community, having a say on social issues is "virtue signalling."

Imagine people thinking that a football club throwing its support behind a social cause somehow distracts its football department from winning games of football.
 
What's the history on roobet? To be honest I never paid attention to that side of football until my adult years and I can't find any info on it anywhere.

Was an online betting site, run by someone else for North. Basically a branded site.
 
Back
Top