- Banned
- #26
Same. The .00001%Am a degenerate scumbag
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Same. The .00001%Am a degenerate scumbag
1993
It wasnt called one special season for nothing
If only the pies beat the crows.
'13 '16 and '19 for me.
Me being a freo supporter. I would of been confident in freo having a good game vs the cats in the 2013 GF. It would of been close.13 and 19 definitely.
Not sure about 16 considering we got smashed in the PF.
This is how we think now. And you should be damn happy about even being able to think about finals.
Some teams lose finals on a far less consistant basis.
We've won our 3 flags and that's good enough for at least 60+ years.
If that's not good enough for you, you're simply spoilt and ungrateful.
We would’ve belted Freo in that GFYup I tend to agree here, Dogs were very gettable and lets be frank has some pretty favorable umpiring to win that flag. I also don't think we would have beaten Freo given they beat us weeks earlier at KP.
What do you base that on? What would be different than when we lost to them in the qualifying final? Freo weren't as bad as people make out in that GF, they just didn't take their chances against the Hawks, they had the same number of scoring shots, lost the I50 count by 1.We would’ve belted Freo in that GF
The final being at Kardinia suited Freo, same dimensions as Subi, had rested players the previous week. We had no Hawkins, an injured Enright and started Chappy on the pine.. absolute smash and grab. We were the best team in it in 13, massive balls up that finals seriesWhat do you base that on? What would be different than when we lost to them in the qualifying final? Freo weren't as bad as people make out in that GF, they just didn't take their chances against the Hawks, they had the same number of scoring shots, lost the I50 count by 1.
but we were EMBARRASSINGLY smashed by NMNot a prelim but if we beat Adelaide in 97 we would of won
We were. Could not stop Carey. But still think we would've won it all if we got past the Crows the next week.but we were EMBARRASSINGLY smashed by NM
Unfortunately their plodders beat our plodders..We should have beat Richmond. They have some absolute plodders running around in their team.
We should have beat Richmond. They have some absolute plodders running around in their team.
Just some of the tactics.Not as many as people like to think. Two years ago people would say they only had four good players. Presumably with a straight face.
They undoubtedly have role players for sure, but it makes them a very cohesive unit. I think some of the adjustments they've made since 2017 have improved them too. Townshend is gone, Grigg did a great job for them, but has been replaced by a genuine and promising ruckman in Soldo. Caddy's role has gone to Lynch which is another plus, and Grimes has gone to another level.
I can't question Geelong's effort at all in that Prelim. They were just too good.
Can you question the 3rd quarter?I can't question Geelong's effort at all in that Prelim. They were just too good.